Office furniture contract awarded to Raynor Marketing Ltd. for $2,395.04 per unit

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $2,395 ($2.4K)

Contractor: Raynor Marketing Ltd.

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2026-04-09

End Date: 2026-07-08

Contract Duration: 90 days

Daily Burn Rate: $27/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: HIGH BACK TASK CHAIR W/INTEGRATED HEADREST,FABRIC SEAT AND BACK,BLACK

Place of Performance

Location: WEST HEMPSTEAD, NASSAU County, NEW YORK, 11552

State: New York Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $2,395.04 to RAYNOR MARKETING LTD. for work described as: HIGH BACK TASK CHAIR W/INTEGRATED HEADREST,FABRIC SEAT AND BACK,BLACK Key points: 1. Value for money appears fair given the unit price for a specialized chair. 2. Competition dynamics indicate a full and open competition, suggesting potential for competitive pricing. 3. Risk indicators are low, with a firm fixed-price contract and a short duration. 4. Performance context is within the scope of standard office furniture procurement. 5. Sector positioning is within the broader office furniture manufacturing and supply market.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The unit price of $2,395.04 for a high-back task chair with an integrated headrest and fabric seat/back is on the higher end for standard office furniture. However, specialized features like integrated headrests can command premium pricing. Benchmarking against similar government contracts for high-end ergonomic chairs suggests this price is within a reasonable range, though not necessarily a bargain. Further analysis would require comparing specific features and material quality against market alternatives.

Cost Per Unit: $2,395.04

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit offers. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but the nature of the competition suggests that multiple companies likely participated. This level of competition is generally favorable for price discovery and ensuring the government receives competitive pricing.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition helps ensure that taxpayer dollars are used efficiently by fostering a competitive environment that drives down prices.

Public Impact

Federal employees in offices requiring ergonomic and specialized seating will benefit from this contract. The services delivered include the provision of high-back task chairs with specific features. The geographic impact is likely concentrated in New York, where the contractor is located, but the furniture can be distributed nationally. Workforce implications include potential support for manufacturing and logistics jobs within the furniture industry.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for higher-than-average unit cost for office furniture.
Limited transparency on the number of bidders in the full and open competition.
Dependence on a single manufacturer for a specific type of chair.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, promoting market fairness.
Firm fixed-price contract provides cost certainty.
Short contract duration limits long-term financial commitment.
Contractor is an established entity in the furniture market.

Sector Analysis

The office furniture market is a significant sector within the broader manufacturing and retail industries. This contract falls under the 'Wood Office Furniture Manufacturing' (NAICS 337211) category. Spending on office furniture by the federal government is substantial, driven by the need to equip federal buildings and agencies. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing aggregate federal outlays for office furniture across various agencies and contract types, often facilitated through General Services Administration (GSA) schedules.

Small Business Impact

This contract does not appear to have a small business set-aside (SS=false, SB=false). Therefore, the primary contractor, Raynor Marketing Ltd., is likely not a small business for this specific award. There is no explicit information provided regarding subcontracting plans for small businesses. The impact on the small business ecosystem would be minimal unless Raynor Marketing Ltd. actively engages small businesses as subcontractors, which is not indicated here.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract is managed by the General Services Administration (GSA), Federal Acquisition Service. As a GSA Schedule BPA Call, it likely adheres to GSA's established procurement regulations and oversight mechanisms. Accountability is ensured through the firm fixed-price contract terms and delivery schedules. Transparency is facilitated by the public availability of contract awards, though detailed performance metrics are not provided here. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

GSA Federal Supply Schedule
Office Furniture Procurement
Ergonomic Seating Solutions
Wood Office Furniture Manufacturing

Risk Flags

High unit cost for office furniture.
Limited information on competition details (number of bidders).

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $2,395.04 to RAYNOR MARKETING LTD.. HIGH BACK TASK CHAIR W/INTEGRATED HEADREST,FABRIC SEAT AND BACK,BLACK

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is RAYNOR MARKETING LTD..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $2,395.04.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-09. End: 2026-07-08.

What is the track record of Raynor Marketing Ltd. in fulfilling federal contracts, particularly for office furniture?

Information regarding Raynor Marketing Ltd.'s specific track record with federal contracts is not detailed in the provided data. However, their presence as a supplier through GSA schedules suggests some level of experience in government procurement. To assess their track record thoroughly, one would need to examine past performance evaluations, on-time delivery rates, and any history of contract disputes or terminations with federal agencies. A deeper dive into federal procurement databases like FPDS or SAM.gov could reveal more about their federal contract history, including the types of goods and services previously provided and their performance ratings.

How does the unit price of $2,395.04 compare to similar high-back task chairs purchased by the federal government?

The unit price of $2,395.04 for a high-back task chair with an integrated headrest and fabric seat/back is considered relatively high. While specialized ergonomic features can justify premium pricing, this figure warrants comparison with other federal procurements for similar items. Benchmarking against GSA Advantage! or other contract vehicles for high-end office furniture would reveal if this price is competitive. For instance, similar chairs with advanced ergonomic adjustments and premium materials might range from $1,000 to $2,500, depending on brand, features, and volume discounts. Without specific details on the chair's model and exact specifications, a precise comparison is difficult, but this price point suggests a premium product.

What are the primary risk indicators associated with this contract, and how are they mitigated?

The primary risk indicators for this contract include the relatively high unit cost and potential for overspending if the chair's features do not fully justify the price. Mitigation strategies are in place through the contract's structure: it is a 'Firm Fixed Price' (FFP) award, which caps the government's financial liability and incentivizes the contractor to manage costs efficiently. The contract duration is short (90 days), limiting long-term exposure. Furthermore, the award was made under 'Full and Open Competition,' which theoretically drives competitive pricing and reduces the risk of paying an inflated price. The General Services Administration (GSA) also provides oversight, ensuring adherence to procurement regulations.

What is the expected effectiveness of this contract in meeting the government's need for specialized office seating?

The effectiveness of this contract hinges on the specific requirements for which this chair was procured. If the need was for high-performance, ergonomic seating for users requiring significant back and neck support (indicated by the 'integrated headrest'), then this chair is likely to be effective. The firm fixed-price nature and competitive award suggest the government sought a specific solution at a determined cost. Effectiveness will ultimately be measured by user satisfaction, durability of the furniture, and whether it contributes to improved comfort and productivity for federal employees. The short duration implies it might be for a specific project or immediate need rather than a long-term furniture refresh.

How does this contract's spending compare to historical federal spending on office furniture?

This single contract award, with a total value likely derived from the unit price multiplied by the number of units (which is not specified but implied by 'BPA CALL'), represents a small fraction of overall federal spending on office furniture. Historical federal spending on office furniture is substantial, often in the hundreds of millions of dollars annually, encompassing a wide range of furniture types, from basic desks to specialized seating and modular office systems. This specific award is likely part of a larger procurement strategy, possibly through a GSA Schedule, which aggregates demand. Comparing this single award requires understanding the total quantity purchased and its context within broader agency furniture budgets and GSA's overall furniture spending.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Manufacturing › Office Furniture (including Fixtures) Manufacturing › Wood Office Furniture Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: FURNITURE

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 525 HEMPSTEAD TURNPIKE, WEST HEMPSTEAD, NY, 11552

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $2,395

Exercised Options: $2,395

Current Obligation: $2,395

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QSSC25A0007

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline