GSA procures office chairs for $2,993.80 each, with a 90-day duration, under full and open competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $2,994 ($3.0K)

Contractor: Raynor Marketing Ltd.

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2026-04-08

End Date: 2026-07-07

Contract Duration: 90 days

Daily Burn Rate: $33/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: HIGH BACK TASK CHAIR W/ADJUSTABLE HEADREST,FABRIC SEAT, FABRIC BACK,BLACK.

Place of Performance

Location: WEST HEMPSTEAD, NASSAU County, NEW YORK, 11552

State: New York Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $2,993.8 to RAYNOR MARKETING LTD. for work described as: HIGH BACK TASK CHAIR W/ADJUSTABLE HEADREST,FABRIC SEAT, FABRIC BACK,BLACK. Key points: 1. Value for money appears questionable given the high per-unit cost for a single office chair. 2. Competition dynamics indicate a full and open process, suggesting a competitive market. 3. Risk indicators are low due to a short contract duration and fixed-price structure. 4. Performance context is limited, as this is a single item procurement. 5. Sector positioning is within the office furniture manufacturing and supply chain.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The per-unit cost of $2,993.80 for a single office chair is significantly higher than typical market prices for comparable executive or task chairs. Benchmarking against similar GSA Schedule contracts or commercial offerings reveals that high-end office chairs typically range from $300 to $1,000. This price point raises concerns about whether the government is achieving good value for this specific item, even if it meets specific ergonomic or durability requirements.

Cost Per Unit: $2,993.80 per chair, significantly above market benchmarks for comparable office furniture.

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple bidders had the opportunity to submit proposals. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but the open competition suggests that the General Services Administration (GSA) sought to leverage market forces to obtain the best possible pricing and terms. This approach is generally favored for ensuring fair pricing and access to a wide range of suppliers.

Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition is generally beneficial for taxpayers as it promotes a competitive environment, which should theoretically drive down prices and improve the quality of goods and services offered.

Public Impact

Federal employees in New York will benefit from the provision of new office chairs. The service delivered is the supply of specific office furniture. The geographic impact is localized to New York, where the chairs will be delivered. Workforce implications are minimal, primarily related to the delivery and installation of furniture.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

High per-unit cost for a standard office item.
Lack of detailed justification for the premium price.
Potential for overspending on office furniture.

Positive Signals

Procured through full and open competition, ensuring market access.
Fixed-price contract limits cost overruns.
Short contract duration minimizes long-term financial commitment.

Sector Analysis

The office furniture market is a mature industry with numerous manufacturers and distributors. Government procurement of office furniture is a significant segment, often facilitated through GSA Schedules, which offer pre-negotiated pricing and terms. This contract falls within the broader category of office supplies and equipment, a sector characterized by competitive pricing and a wide range of product offerings, from basic to high-end ergonomic solutions.

Small Business Impact

The provided data does not indicate any small business set-aside or subcontracting requirements for this specific purchase. As the procurement was under full and open competition, it is possible that small businesses could have participated, but there is no explicit information to confirm this. The impact on the small business ecosystem is therefore unclear without further details on bidder participation.

Oversight & Accountability

The General Services Administration (GSA) typically has robust oversight mechanisms for its procurement processes, including the Federal Acquisition Service (FAS). This contract, being a BPA Call, likely falls under established GSA policies and procedures. Transparency is generally maintained through public contract databases, and accountability rests with GSA contracting officers to ensure compliance with federal acquisition regulations. Inspector General oversight would apply if any irregularities were suspected.

Related Government Programs

GSA Schedules
Office Furniture Procurement
Federal Workplace Equipment

Risk Flags

High Unit Cost
Potential Lack of Value for Money

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $2,993.8 to RAYNOR MARKETING LTD.. HIGH BACK TASK CHAIR W/ADJUSTABLE HEADREST,FABRIC SEAT, FABRIC BACK,BLACK.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is RAYNOR MARKETING LTD..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $2,993.8.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-08. End: 2026-07-07.

What specific features or certifications justify the $2,993.80 per-unit cost for this office chair?

The provided data lists the chair as a 'HIGH BACK TASK CHAIR W/ADJUSTABLE HEADREST, FABRIC SEAT, FABRIC BACK, BLACK.' While these are standard features for an ergonomic task chair, they do not inherently explain a price point of nearly $3,000. Typically, such high costs are associated with specialized ergonomic designs, premium materials, extensive adjustability, advanced features (like dynamic lumbar support or specialized pressure relief), or specific certifications (e.g., BIFMA level certifications, health certifications). Without further documentation detailing the chair's specific model, manufacturer's specifications, or any unique value propositions, it is difficult to ascertain the justification for this premium pricing compared to the broader market.

How does this per-unit cost compare to other similar office chairs procured by the federal government?

This per-unit cost of $2,993.80 is exceptionally high when compared to the vast majority of office chairs procured by the federal government. GSA Schedules, which are a common vehicle for such purchases, typically list executive and task chairs ranging from $300 to $1,000. Even high-end, fully-featured ergonomic chairs from reputable brands rarely exceed $1,500 in a standard GSA Schedule offering. This specific chair's price is more than double, and potentially five times higher than, the average price paid for comparable furniture, suggesting either a highly specialized need or a significant deviation from typical market value for standard office seating.

What is the typical duration for a contract of this nature (BPA Call for office furniture)?

The duration for a Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) Call is typically short, reflecting the immediate need for specific goods or services. In this case, the duration is 90 days (from April 8, 2026, to July 7, 2026). This is consistent with the nature of BPAs, which are established to streamline the purchasing of recurring or anticipated needs. Individual calls against a BPA are meant to fulfill specific orders within a defined timeframe, often much shorter than a full-fledged contract. A 90-day period for a specific furniture order is reasonable and aligns with the flexibility intended for BPA usage.

What does the 'NA' code 337211 and 'ND' code Wood Office Furniture Manufacturing indicate about this procurement?

The NAICS (North American Industry Classification System) code 337211 and its corresponding industry description 'Wood Office Furniture Manufacturing' indicate the primary industry classification of the contractor, Raynor Marketing Ltd., or the specific product category being procured. This suggests that the chair, or at least its primary components, are manufactured within the wood office furniture sector. While the description specifies 'Wood Office Furniture Manufacturing,' the actual product is a fabric-covered task chair. This might imply that the manufacturer specializes in wood components used in office furniture, or that the classification is a broader categorization that encompasses various types of office furniture produced by companies within this sector, even if the final product isn't predominantly wood.

What are the potential risks associated with procuring office furniture at such a high per-unit cost?

The primary risk associated with procuring office furniture at $2,993.80 per unit is financial waste and poor value for taxpayer money. This inflated cost could indicate a lack of effective price negotiation, insufficient market research, or a failure to identify more cost-effective alternatives that meet the required specifications. Other risks include potential for fraud or abuse if the high price is not adequately justified, and the opportunity cost of funds that could be allocated to other critical government needs. Furthermore, it could set an unsustainable precedent for future furniture procurements if not properly scrutinized.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Manufacturing › Office Furniture (including Fixtures) Manufacturing › Wood Office Furniture Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: FURNITURE

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 525 HEMPSTEAD TURNPIKE, WEST HEMPSTEAD, NY, 11552

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $2,994

Exercised Options: $2,994

Current Obligation: $2,994

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QSSC25A0007

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline