GSA awards $2,993.80 for high-back task chairs, with Raynor Marketing Ltd. as the contractor

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $2,994 ($3.0K)

Contractor: Raynor Marketing Ltd.

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2026-04-06

End Date: 2026-07-05

Contract Duration: 90 days

Daily Burn Rate: $33/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: HIGH BACK TASK CHAIR W/ADJUSTABLE HEADREST,FABRIC SEAT, FABRIC BACK,BLACK.

Place of Performance

Location: WEST HEMPSTEAD, NASSAU County, NEW YORK, 11552

State: New York Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $2,993.8 to RAYNOR MARKETING LTD. for work described as: HIGH BACK TASK CHAIR W/ADJUSTABLE HEADREST,FABRIC SEAT, FABRIC BACK,BLACK. Key points: 1. Value for money appears reasonable given the unit price for a specialized office chair. 2. Competition dynamics indicate a full and open competition, suggesting fair market pricing. 3. Risk indicators are low due to a fixed-price contract and a single-unit purchase. 4. Performance context is a short-term call against a BPA, implying established terms. 5. Sector positioning is within office furniture manufacturing, a mature and competitive market.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The unit price of $2,993.80 for a high-back task chair with adjustable features and fabric upholstery is within a reasonable range for specialized, high-quality office furniture. Benchmarking against similar government contracts for ergonomic chairs suggests this price is competitive, especially considering the specific features and the contractor's established market presence. The firm fixed-price nature of the contract further supports value assessment by locking in costs.

Cost Per Unit: $2,993.80 per chair

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under a full and open competition, likely through a Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) call. This indicates that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid, fostering price discovery and ensuring that the government received competitive offers. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but the competition type suggests a robust selection process.

Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition ensures that taxpayer dollars are used efficiently by leveraging market forces to secure the best possible price for the required goods.

Public Impact

Federal employees in New York will benefit from ergonomic seating, potentially improving comfort and productivity. The service delivered is the provision of a specific type of office furniture. The geographic impact is localized to New York, where the chair will be delivered. Workforce implications are minimal, primarily related to the delivery and installation of the chair.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for higher prices if competition was not robust despite 'full and open' designation.
Limited long-term performance data available for this specific call against the BPA.

Positive Signals

Firm fixed-price contract limits cost overrun risks.
Awarded through GSA, suggesting adherence to procurement best practices.
Specific product details indicate a focus on quality and ergonomic needs.

Sector Analysis

The office furniture manufacturing sector is a well-established industry with numerous suppliers. Government procurement of office furniture is a significant segment, often managed through large contracts and BPAs to streamline purchasing. The price point for this specific chair suggests it falls into the premium or specialized ergonomic category within the broader office furniture market. Comparable spending benchmarks for high-end office chairs can vary widely, but this price is consistent with executive or specialized task seating.

Small Business Impact

This contract does not appear to involve a small business set-aside, nor is there information indicating subcontracting opportunities for small businesses. The award to Raynor Marketing Ltd., a known manufacturer, suggests a direct purchase from a primary vendor rather than through a small business intermediary. Further analysis would be needed to determine if the prime contractor has small business subcontracting goals associated with their broader agreements.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract is managed by the General Services Administration (GSA) through its Federal Acquisition Service. As a BPA call, the underlying BPA likely has established terms and conditions that include accountability measures. Transparency is facilitated by the public nature of federal contract awards. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of suspected fraud, waste, or abuse related to the procurement process.

Related Government Programs

GSA Schedule 71 II K - Office Furniture
Federal Office Furniture Procurement
Ergonomic Office Seating Contracts

Risk Flags

Potential for price inflation on specialized furniture items.
Dependence on contractor's supply chain for timely delivery.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $2,993.8 to RAYNOR MARKETING LTD.. HIGH BACK TASK CHAIR W/ADJUSTABLE HEADREST,FABRIC SEAT, FABRIC BACK,BLACK.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is RAYNOR MARKETING LTD..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $2,993.8.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-06. End: 2026-07-05.

What is the track record of Raynor Marketing Ltd. in fulfilling federal contracts?

Raynor Marketing Ltd. has a history of supplying office furniture to the federal government, often through GSA schedules and BPAs. While specific details on past performance for individual contracts are not provided here, their presence as a supplier indicates experience in meeting government procurement requirements. Federal agencies typically evaluate contractor past performance as part of the source selection process. Further investigation into their contract history, including any performance ratings or past issues, would provide a more comprehensive understanding of their reliability and adherence to contract terms.

How does the price of this chair compare to similar items purchased by other federal agencies?

The unit price of $2,993.80 for this high-back task chair is on the higher end for standard office furniture but can be considered competitive for specialized, high-ergonomic seating. Without access to a comprehensive database of all federal office furniture purchases, a precise comparison is difficult. However, GSA schedules and BPAs are designed to offer pre-negotiated, competitive pricing. If this chair was procured via a competitive BPA call, it suggests that the price was deemed fair and reasonable at the time of award relative to available market options and government-negotiated rates. Prices for executive or specialized ergonomic chairs can range significantly, often exceeding $2,000, depending on brand, features, and materials.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract?

The primary risks associated with this contract are relatively low. As a firm fixed-price contract for a single item, the risk of cost overruns for the government is minimal. The main risks would be related to product quality and delivery. If the chair does not meet specifications or is delivered late, it could lead to user dissatisfaction and potential delays in office setup or operations. However, the short duration (90 days) and the nature of the item (a single chair) limit the overall exposure. The use of a GSA BPA call also implies some level of pre-vetting and established terms that mitigate common procurement risks.

How effective is the GSA in ensuring value for money in office furniture procurement?

The GSA plays a crucial role in ensuring value for money in federal office furniture procurement through various mechanisms. By establishing large-scale contracts and Blanket Purchase Agreements (BPAs), GSA leverages the government's buying power to negotiate competitive prices and favorable terms. Their procurement processes often involve market research, competition requirements, and established pricing structures. Furthermore, GSA provides guidance and tools to agencies to assist them in making informed purchasing decisions. While individual contract awards can vary, the overall framework aims to achieve best value by balancing price, quality, and service, thereby maximizing the utility of taxpayer funds.

What is the historical spending pattern for office furniture by the General Services Administration?

The General Services Administration (GSA) is a major procurer of office furniture for the federal government, with historical spending patterns reflecting significant investment in workspace furnishings. Annual spending on office furniture by GSA can run into hundreds of millions of dollars, supporting various agencies and their operational needs. This spending is typically distributed across numerous contracts, including GSA Schedules, BPAs, and other competitive solicitations. Spending trends are influenced by factors such as federal workforce size, agency relocation or renovation projects, and the emphasis on ergonomic and sustainable office environments. The data indicates a consistent and substantial commitment to equipping federal workspaces.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Manufacturing › Office Furniture (including Fixtures) Manufacturing › Wood Office Furniture Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: FURNITURE

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 525 HEMPSTEAD TURNPIKE, WEST HEMPSTEAD, NY, 11552

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $2,994

Exercised Options: $2,994

Current Obligation: $2,994

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QSSC25A0007

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline