GSA awards $3.37M for office furniture, with potential for significant future spending

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $3,373 ($3.4K)

Contractor: Metro Office Solutions Inc

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2026-04-06

End Date: 2026-05-11

Contract Duration: 35 days

Daily Burn Rate: $96/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE WITH ECONOMIC PRICE ADJUSTMENT

Sector: Other

Official Description: FILING CABINET

Place of Performance

Location: BELCAMP, HARFORD County, MARYLAND, 21017

State: Maryland Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $3,372.65 to METRO OFFICE SOLUTIONS INC for work described as: FILING CABINET Key points: 1. Value for money appears fair given the nature of office furniture procurement. 2. Full and open competition suggests a healthy market for office furniture suppliers. 3. Contract duration is relatively short, indicating potential for regular re-competition and price adjustments. 4. The contract is a BPA Call, suggesting it's part of a larger, pre-negotiated agreement. 5. Geographic scope is limited to Maryland, potentially impacting broader market reach. 6. The fixed-price with economic price adjustment clause offers some protection against inflation.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $3.37 million for office furniture over a short period is moderate. Benchmarking against similar large-scale office furniture procurements is difficult without more specific details on the items and quantities. However, the use of a BPA call suggests that pricing may have been established through a prior competitive process, potentially offering some level of value. The economic price adjustment clause could lead to increased costs if market prices rise significantly.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit offers. This suggests a competitive marketplace for office furniture. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but the open competition is a positive sign for price discovery and potentially lower costs for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by fostering a competitive environment that can drive down prices and encourage innovation among suppliers.

Public Impact

Federal agencies in Maryland requiring office furniture will benefit from this contract. The contract will facilitate the procurement of office furniture, including filing cabinets. The geographic impact is primarily within Maryland. Workforce implications are likely related to the manufacturing and delivery of office furniture.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Economic price adjustment clause could lead to cost overruns if inflation is high.
Short contract duration may lead to frequent re-competition and administrative overhead.
Limited geographic scope might exclude potentially more competitive suppliers outside Maryland.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition, promoting market access for suppliers.
BPA Call structure suggests efficiency and potentially pre-negotiated favorable terms.
Fixed-price element provides some cost certainty.

Sector Analysis

The office furniture manufacturing sector is a mature industry with established players. Government procurement represents a significant market segment. This contract, for filing cabinets, falls under the broader category of office equipment and supplies. Comparable spending benchmarks would depend on the specific types and quantities of furniture procured, but GSA's role as a central procurement agency indicates this is a standard type of award.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small business participation (ss and sb fields) is not explicitly set aside or required for this contract. Therefore, the direct impact on small businesses is likely limited unless they are subcontractors to the prime contractor, Metro Office Solutions Inc. Further analysis would be needed to determine subcontracting plans and their potential benefits to the small business ecosystem.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the General Services Administration (GSA), specifically the Federal Acquisition Service. As a BPA Call, it is likely governed by the terms of the underlying Blanket Purchase Agreement. Transparency is generally maintained through federal procurement databases, and accountability rests with GSA to ensure compliance with contract terms and fair pricing.

Related Government Programs

GSA Federal Supply Schedule
Office Furniture Procurement
BPA Calls

Risk Flags

Economic Price Adjustment Clause
Short Contract Duration
Limited Geographic Scope

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $3,372.65 to METRO OFFICE SOLUTIONS INC. FILING CABINET

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is METRO OFFICE SOLUTIONS INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $3,372.65.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-06. End: 2026-05-11.

What is the track record of Metro Office Solutions Inc. with federal contracts?

Metro Office Solutions Inc. has been awarded federal contracts, as indicated by this BPA Call. To assess their track record, a deeper dive into their contract history with the federal government is necessary. This would involve examining past performance evaluations, any instances of contract disputes or terminations, and the overall volume and type of contracts they have successfully managed. A history of successful, on-time, and within-budget contract completions would be a positive indicator, while a pattern of issues could raise concerns about their reliability and capacity to fulfill this current award effectively.

How does the pricing of this contract compare to similar office furniture procurements?

Direct comparison of pricing is challenging without detailed specifications of the furniture items and quantities procured under this $3.37 million BPA Call. However, the fact that it was awarded under full and open competition suggests that the pricing should be competitive. The General Services Administration (GSA) often negotiates favorable rates through its Federal Supply Schedules, which may underpin this BPA. To benchmark effectively, one would need to compare the unit prices for specific items (e.g., filing cabinets of a certain size and material) against other GSA schedule awards or open market procurements for comparable items within the same timeframe and geographic region.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract?

Key risks include potential cost increases due to the economic price adjustment clause, especially in periods of high inflation. The relatively short duration of the contract (less than two months for the call, though the BPA itself may be longer) could lead to administrative burdens associated with frequent re-competition or modifications. There's also a risk that the limited geographic scope (Maryland) might prevent the government from accessing potentially better pricing or product offerings from suppliers located elsewhere. Finally, the performance risk associated with the contractor, Metro Office Solutions Inc., needs to be considered, although this is mitigated by the competitive award process.

How effective is the use of a BPA Call for this type of procurement?

Using a Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) Call for office furniture procurement can be an effective strategy for agencies needing recurring supplies. BPAs streamline the ordering process by establishing pre-negotiated terms and conditions, often including pricing, with one or more vendors. A BPA Call then allows for specific orders against that agreement. This approach can lead to faster delivery times and administrative efficiencies compared to issuing individual solicitations for each purchase. For commodity items like office furniture, where needs may be predictable, a BPA Call can offer a good balance of flexibility and cost control, provided the underlying BPA was competitively established.

What is the historical spending pattern for office furniture by the General Services Administration?

The General Services Administration (GSA) is a primary channel for federal agencies to procure office furniture. Historical spending data would likely show consistent and substantial investment in office furniture across various federal departments and agencies. GSA's Federal Supply Schedules (FSS) for office furniture are regularly utilized, with billions spent annually across the government. This specific $3.37 million BPA Call represents a small fraction of the overall federal expenditure on office furnishings, reflecting ongoing needs for workspace outfitting and replacement.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Manufacturing › Office Furniture (including Fixtures) Manufacturing › Office Furniture (except Wood) Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: FURNITURE

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE WITH ECONOMIC PRICE ADJUSTMENT (K)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 4692 MILLENNIUM DR, BELCAMP, MD, 21017

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Asian Pacific American Owned Business, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Minority Owned Business, Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $3,373

Exercised Options: $3,373

Current Obligation: $3,373

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QSMA23A08NC

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline