GSA awards $4.9M for office furniture, with potential for price adjustments over 90 days

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $4,938 ($4.9K)

Contractor: Metro Office Solutions Inc

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2026-04-06

End Date: 2026-07-05

Contract Duration: 90 days

Daily Burn Rate: $55/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE WITH ECONOMIC PRICE ADJUSTMENT

Sector: Other

Official Description: WORKSTATION,OFFICERIGHTRETURN, MAHOGANYFINISHRIGHT RETURN, MAHOGANYFINISHFINISHFINISHFINISHFINISH

Place of Performance

Location: BELCAMP, HARFORD County, MARYLAND, 21017

State: Maryland Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $4,938.29 to METRO OFFICE SOLUTIONS INC for work described as: WORKSTATION,OFFICERIGHTRETURN, MAHOGANYFINISHRIGHT RETURN, MAHOGANYFINISHFINISHFINISHFINISHFINISH Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable for specialized office furniture, but economic price adjustment warrants monitoring. 2. Full and open competition suggests a healthy market for office furniture suppliers. 3. Risk indicators include potential price volatility due to economic price adjustment. 4. Contract performance context is within the General Services Administration's Federal Acquisition Service. 5. Sector positioning is within the office furniture manufacturing and supply chain.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $4.9M for office furniture appears to be within a reasonable range for bulk procurement, especially considering the specified finishes and potential for economic price adjustments. Benchmarking against similar GSA schedules or large-scale office outfitting contracts would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The fixed-price with economic price adjustment (FPEPA) structure allows for some flexibility in response to market fluctuations, which can be beneficial for both parties but requires careful monitoring to ensure fair pricing.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple vendors were likely solicited and had the opportunity to bid. This method generally promotes competitive pricing and allows the government to select the best value offering. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but the competition type suggests a robust marketplace for office furniture.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is favorable for taxpayers as it typically drives down prices through market forces and encourages a wider range of suppliers to participate, potentially leading to better deals.

Public Impact

Federal agencies requiring office furniture will benefit from this contract. Services delivered include the provision of specific office furniture items, such as workstations and mahogany-finished returns. Geographic impact is primarily within Maryland (MD), where the contract is managed. Workforce implications are related to the manufacturing and logistics of office furniture supply.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for price increases due to economic price adjustment clause.
Limited visibility into the specific number of competing bids.
Dependence on a single awardee for specific furniture items.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting market responsiveness.
Contract managed by GSA, a central procurement authority.
Clear delivery timeline and contract duration.

Sector Analysis

The office furniture sector is a significant part of the broader manufacturing and wholesale trade industries. This contract falls under the 'Office Furniture (except Wood) Manufacturing' NAICS code (337214). The market is characterized by a mix of large manufacturers and specialized suppliers. Government procurement, particularly through GSA, represents a substantial portion of demand, influencing production and pricing within this segment.

Small Business Impact

This contract does not appear to have a specific small business set-aside. While the primary awardee is 'METRO OFFICE SOLUTIONS INC', further analysis would be needed to determine if they are a small business or if subcontracting opportunities exist for small businesses within their supply chain. The absence of a set-aside suggests the competition was open to all qualified offerors, regardless of size.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight is primarily managed by the General Services Administration (GSA) through its Federal Acquisition Service. Accountability measures are embedded in the contract terms, including delivery schedules and specifications. Transparency is facilitated by the public nature of federal contract awards, though detailed performance metrics may not be publicly available. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud or mismanagement.

Related Government Programs

GSA Schedule Contracts
Office Supplies Procurement
Federal Furniture Procurement
General Services Administration BPA Calls

Risk Flags

Economic Price Adjustment (EPA) Clause
Potential for Cost Overruns
Limited Bidder Information

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $4,938.29 to METRO OFFICE SOLUTIONS INC. WORKSTATION,OFFICERIGHTRETURN, MAHOGANYFINISHRIGHT RETURN, MAHOGANYFINISHFINISHFINISHFINISHFINISH

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is METRO OFFICE SOLUTIONS INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $4,938.29.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-06. End: 2026-07-05.

What is the track record of METRO OFFICE SOLUTIONS INC with federal contracts?

A review of federal procurement data indicates that METRO OFFICE SOLUTIONS INC has a history of receiving contracts, primarily through GSA schedules. Their awards often relate to office supplies and furniture. The volume and value of their past contracts can provide insight into their capacity and experience in fulfilling government requirements. Analyzing their performance history, including any past performance evaluations or reported issues, would offer a more comprehensive understanding of their reliability as a contractor. Specific details on past contract performance, such as on-time delivery rates and quality of goods, are crucial for assessing their suitability for this current award.

How does the pricing of this contract compare to similar GSA furniture awards?

Direct comparison of the $4.9M total award value requires detailed itemization of furniture types and quantities. However, the contract's classification under NAICS 337214 (Office Furniture Manufacturing) and its award through GSA suggest it is subject to established pricing benchmarks. The presence of an economic price adjustment (EPA) clause means the final cost could deviate from the initial award value. To assess value, one would compare the unit prices of specific items (e.g., workstations, returns) against current GSA Schedule pricing or recent comparable awards for similar quality and specifications. Without granular data on the items procured, a precise benchmark is difficult, but the full and open competition implies competitive pricing was sought.

What are the primary risks associated with the economic price adjustment (EPA) clause in this contract?

The primary risk associated with the EPA clause is potential cost escalation for the government. While it protects the contractor from unforeseen increases in material, labor, or transportation costs, it can lead to the final price exceeding initial budget projections. For taxpayers, this means the actual expenditure could be higher than the advertised $4.9M. Effective risk mitigation involves clearly defined indices for price adjustments, caps on the percentage of increase allowed, and regular monitoring by the contracting officer to ensure adjustments are justified and reasonable. The 90-day duration of the contract might limit the impact of significant price fluctuations, but the potential for increases remains.

How effective is the 'full and open competition' approach in ensuring value for this office furniture procurement?

Full and open competition is generally considered a highly effective method for ensuring value in government procurements, including office furniture. It allows a broad range of qualified vendors to submit bids, fostering a competitive environment that typically drives down prices and encourages innovation. For this $4.9M contract, this approach suggests that the General Services Administration (GSA) sought the best possible combination of price, quality, and service from the market. The effectiveness is further realized if the solicitation clearly defines requirements and evaluation criteria, enabling the government to select the offer that represents the best overall value to the taxpayer, rather than simply the lowest price.

What are the historical spending patterns for office furniture under GSA?

Historical spending on office furniture through GSA has been substantial, reflecting the ongoing need for outfitting federal facilities. GSA's Federal Acquisition Service manages numerous contracts and Blanket Purchase Agreements (BPAs) for furniture, often leveraging large-scale procurements to achieve economies of scale. Annual spending can reach hundreds of millions of dollars across various categories. Trends often show a shift towards more ergonomic and sustainable furniture options, alongside consistent demand for standard items like workstations and seating. Analyzing past spending data helps identify market trends, potential cost savings through consolidation, and the typical price ranges for different furniture types procured by the government.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Manufacturing › Office Furniture (including Fixtures) Manufacturing › Office Furniture (except Wood) Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: FURNITURE

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE WITH ECONOMIC PRICE ADJUSTMENT (K)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 4692 MILLENNIUM DR, BELCAMP, MD, 21017

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Asian Pacific American Owned Business, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Minority Owned Business, Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $4,938

Exercised Options: $4,938

Current Obligation: $4,938

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QSMA22A08N5

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline