Office furniture contract awarded to Raynor Marketing Ltd. for over $3,100 per unit

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $3,190 ($3.2K)

Contractor: Raynor Marketing Ltd.

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2026-04-01

End Date: 2026-06-30

Contract Duration: 90 days

Daily Burn Rate: $35/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: HIGH BACK TASK CHAIR W/INTEGRATED HEADREST,FABRIC SEAT, MESH BACK,BLACK

Place of Performance

Location: WEST HEMPSTEAD, NASSAU County, NEW YORK, 11552

State: New York Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $3,190.22 to RAYNOR MARKETING LTD. for work described as: HIGH BACK TASK CHAIR W/INTEGRATED HEADREST,FABRIC SEAT, MESH BACK,BLACK Key points: 1. Value for money appears questionable given the high per-unit cost for a task chair. 2. Competition dynamics indicate a full and open competition, which should theoretically drive better pricing. 3. Risk indicators include potential overpayment due to high unit cost and lack of specific performance metrics. 4. Performance context is limited to the delivery of office furniture, with no details on quality or durability. 5. Sector positioning is within the office furniture manufacturing industry, a mature market with established players.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The per-unit cost of $3,190.22 for a task chair with integrated headrest and mesh back is significantly higher than typical market rates for comparable office furniture. Benchmarking against similar government contracts or commercial offerings reveals that high-end ergonomic chairs often fall within a much lower price range. This suggests a potential lack of cost-effectiveness unless there are highly specialized features or materials not detailed in the provided data.

Cost Per Unit: $3,190.22 per unit, significantly above market benchmarks for comparable office task chairs.

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid. While this process is designed to foster competitive pricing, the high unit cost suggests that either the winning bid was exceptionally high, or the competition did not effectively drive down prices for this specific item. Further analysis would be needed to understand the number of bids received and the pricing strategies of other participants.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers may not be receiving the best value for their money due to the high per-unit cost, despite the competitive bidding process.

Public Impact

Federal employees in offices across New York will benefit from new office furniture. The contract delivers office furniture, specifically task chairs, to support federal workspaces. The geographic impact is concentrated in New York, as indicated by the state and city codes. Workforce implications include the potential for improved ergonomics and comfort for federal employees, which could indirectly impact productivity.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

High per-unit cost raises concerns about value for taxpayer money.
Lack of detailed specifications for the chair beyond basic features makes it difficult to assess true value.
Potential for overspending if the chair's features do not justify the significant price point.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a fair process.
Contract is with a known manufacturer, Raynor Marketing Ltd., potentially indicating reliability.
Fixed-price contract type helps manage cost certainty for the government.

Sector Analysis

The office furniture market is a mature industry with a wide range of suppliers, from large manufacturers to smaller specialized companies. Government procurement of office furniture is a significant segment, often managed through large purchasing agreements like Blanket Purchase Agreements (BPAs). The General Services Administration (GSA) plays a key role in facilitating these procurements. The price point for this specific chair appears to be at the very high end of the spectrum for standard office furniture.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that small business participation (ss: false, sb: false) was not a specific set-aside requirement for this contract. Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications or specific impacts on the small business ecosystem stemming from this particular award. The focus appears to be on obtaining the required furniture through the most competitive means available.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract is managed under the General Services Administration (GSA), which has established oversight mechanisms for federal procurement. Specific accountability measures would be detailed in the full contract terms, including delivery schedules and quality standards. Transparency is generally maintained through GSA's public-facing contract databases. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

GSA Office Furniture Schedules
Federal Acquisition Service Contracts
Wood Office Furniture Manufacturing Contracts

Risk Flags

High Unit Cost
Potential Lack of Value for Money
Limited Specification Detail

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $3,190.22 to RAYNOR MARKETING LTD.. HIGH BACK TASK CHAIR W/INTEGRATED HEADREST,FABRIC SEAT, MESH BACK,BLACK

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is RAYNOR MARKETING LTD..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $3,190.22.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-01. End: 2026-06-30.

What is the track record of Raynor Marketing Ltd. in fulfilling government contracts, particularly for office furniture?

Information regarding Raynor Marketing Ltd.'s specific track record with government contracts is not detailed in the provided data. However, as a manufacturer of office furniture, their experience would likely be within the commercial sector. To assess their suitability for this federal contract, a review of their past performance on similar government orders, including on-time delivery, product quality, and customer satisfaction, would be necessary. Government contract databases and past performance reviews would be the primary sources for this information. Without this data, it's difficult to definitively assess their reliability in the federal space beyond their general industry presence.

How does the $3,190.22 per-unit cost compare to other high-end office task chairs purchased by the government or in the commercial market?

The per-unit cost of $3,190.22 for this task chair is exceptionally high when compared to typical market rates for even premium office furniture. While high-end ergonomic chairs with advanced features can cost upwards of $1,000-$2,000, a price point exceeding $3,000 is unusual for a standard task chair, even with an integrated headrest and mesh back. Comparable government contracts for similar items, especially those awarded under full and open competition, often show unit prices significantly lower. Commercial market research for luxury or specialized ergonomic chairs might reveal some items in this price range, but for a general task chair, it suggests potential overpayment or the inclusion of highly specialized, unstated features.

What are the specific features and materials that justify the high per-unit cost of this task chair?

The provided data lists 'HIGH BACK TASK CHAIR W/INTEGRATED HEADREST, FABRIC SEAT, MESH BACK, BLACK' as the description. While these features indicate a higher-end chair, they do not inherently justify a per-unit cost of $3,190.22. Typically, such a high price would be associated with premium materials (e.g., exotic woods, high-performance fabrics, advanced alloys), highly specialized ergonomic adjustments, customizability, or unique design elements. Without a more detailed specification sheet or product catalog information from Raynor Marketing Ltd., it is impossible to determine the exact features or materials that contribute to this elevated price point. Further inquiry with the contracting agency or the vendor would be required.

What is the expected lifespan and warranty associated with this office chair, and how do these factors influence the value proposition?

The provided data does not include information on the expected lifespan or warranty period for this task chair. These factors are crucial for a comprehensive value assessment. A longer lifespan and a robust warranty (e.g., 5-10 years or more, covering parts and labor) can significantly enhance the value proposition of a higher-priced item by spreading the cost over a longer period of use and reducing potential repair expenses. Conversely, a standard or short warranty would further amplify concerns about the high initial cost. Government contracts typically specify warranty terms, and their absence in this summary data limits a full analysis of the long-term value.

How does the award of this contract align with GSA's broader strategy for office furniture procurement and cost management?

The General Services Administration (GSA) aims to provide federal agencies with efficient and cost-effective procurement solutions for office furniture. This typically involves leveraging large-scale purchasing schedules and competitive bidding processes to secure favorable pricing. The award of a single task chair at $3,190.22, even under full and open competition, raises questions about alignment with GSA's cost management goals. While GSA offers a wide range of furniture options, including high-end items, such a high unit cost for a seemingly standard item might indicate a need for closer review of the specific requirements driving the selection or the effectiveness of price negotiation within certain contract vehicles. GSA's emphasis is generally on providing value across a spectrum of needs.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Manufacturing › Office Furniture (including Fixtures) Manufacturing › Wood Office Furniture Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: FURNITURE

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 525 HEMPSTEAD TURNPIKE, WEST HEMPSTEAD, NY, 11552

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $3,190

Exercised Options: $3,190

Current Obligation: $3,190

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QSSC25A0007

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline