GSA awards $2,455 chair contract to Raynor Marketing Ltd. under full and open competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $2,455 ($2.5K)

Contractor: Raynor Marketing Ltd.

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2026-04-01

End Date: 2026-06-30

Contract Duration: 90 days

Daily Burn Rate: $27/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: INTENSIVE USE (24/7) CHAIR W/ FABRIC SEAT AND BACK, BLACK.

Place of Performance

Location: WEST HEMPSTEAD, NASSAU County, NEW YORK, 11552

State: New York Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $2,455.2 to RAYNOR MARKETING LTD. for work described as: INTENSIVE USE (24/7) CHAIR W/ FABRIC SEAT AND BACK, BLACK. Key points: 1. Value for money assessed through benchmarking against similar office furniture contracts. 2. Competition dynamics indicate a potentially competitive market for office seating. 3. Risk indicators include contract duration and potential for price fluctuations. 4. Performance context is within the General Services Administration's Federal Acquisition Service. 5. Sector positioning is within the office furniture manufacturing industry.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The unit price of $2,455 for an intensive use chair appears high when compared to typical government contract pricing for office furniture. While specific features like 24/7 use and fabric seat/back are noted, further benchmarking against comparable intensive-use chairs is recommended to confirm value. The firm fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty, but the initial price point warrants scrutiny.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but this procurement method generally fosters price discovery and encourages competitive pricing. The use of a BPA Call indicates a pre-negotiated agreement, which may streamline the process but doesn't inherently limit competition at the call order level.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is generally favorable for taxpayers as it aims to secure the best possible prices through a wide range of offers.

Public Impact

Federal employees and government agencies requiring durable, high-use office seating will benefit from this contract. The services delivered include the provision of specialized office chairs designed for intensive use. The geographic impact is likely nationwide, given the GSA's role in federal procurement, with specific delivery to New York (ST: NY). Workforce implications are minimal, primarily related to the manufacturing and delivery of the chairs.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

High unit cost for a chair may indicate a lack of aggressive price negotiation or specialized features driving up price.
Limited information on the specific performance requirements beyond 'intensive use' could lead to over-specification or under-delivery.
The contract duration of 90 days (implied by award date and end date) for a single chair purchase seems unusually short, raising questions about the procurement process or scope.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a robust bidding process.
Firm fixed-price contract provides cost certainty for the government.
The chair is specified for intensive use, indicating a focus on durability and long-term functionality.

Sector Analysis

The office furniture manufacturing sector is a mature industry with established players. Government procurement represents a significant market segment. This contract falls within the broader category of commercial office furniture, with a specific focus on high-durability items. Benchmarking against other GSA schedules or federal contracts for similar furniture would provide further context on pricing and market competitiveness.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not specifically set aside for small businesses (SB: false). There is no information provided regarding subcontracting plans. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem is likely limited unless Raynor Marketing Ltd. utilizes small businesses in its supply chain.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would fall under the General Services Administration (GSA), specifically the Federal Acquisition Service. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm fixed-price contract type, requiring delivery as specified. Transparency is generally maintained through GSA's public contract databases. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

GSA Schedules Program
Office Furniture Procurement
Federal Acquisition Service Contracts

Risk Flags

High Unit Cost
Limited Competition Details
Potential for Price Overstatement

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $2,455.2 to RAYNOR MARKETING LTD.. INTENSIVE USE (24/7) CHAIR W/ FABRIC SEAT AND BACK, BLACK.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is RAYNOR MARKETING LTD..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $2,455.2.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-01. End: 2026-06-30.

What is the typical price range for intensive use chairs procured by the federal government?

The typical price range for intensive use chairs procured by the federal government can vary significantly based on specific features, materials, brand, and contract vehicle. However, a unit price of $2,455 for a single chair, even for intensive use, is on the higher end of the spectrum. Many government contracts for office chairs, including those for intensive use, often fall within the $300 to $1,000 range, with some specialized ergonomic or high-end executive chairs potentially exceeding $1,500. Factors such as 24/7 usage ratings, advanced ergonomic adjustments, premium fabric options, and extended warranties can drive up costs. Without a detailed specification of the chair's features and materials, it is difficult to definitively assess if $2,455 represents fair market value, but it warrants further investigation through benchmarking against similar high-durability, specialized seating solutions.

How does the firm fixed-price contract type benefit the government in this scenario?

A firm fixed-price (FFP) contract type provides the greatest amount of cost certainty for the government. Under an FFP agreement, the contractor, Raynor Marketing Ltd., is obligated to perform the work (deliver the chairs) for a predetermined price, regardless of the actual costs incurred by the contractor. This means the government knows exactly how much it will pay for each chair, eliminating the risk of cost overruns. This is particularly beneficial for predictable requirements like furniture procurement. The onus is on the contractor to manage its costs effectively to ensure profitability. For the government, this structure simplifies budgeting and financial management, as the total expenditure is fixed upfront.

What are the potential risks associated with a contract awarded under 'Full and Open Competition'?

While 'Full and Open Competition' is generally the preferred method for maximizing competition and achieving best value, it is not without potential risks. One risk is that the lowest priced, technically acceptable offer might not always represent the best overall value if long-term performance or lifecycle costs are not adequately considered. Another risk is the potential for a lengthy protest period if unsuccessful bidders challenge the award decision, which can delay contract performance. Furthermore, if the solicitation is poorly defined, it could lead to ambiguity and disputes during contract execution. In this specific case, the risk might be that while competition was broad, the resulting price of $2,455 per chair suggests that either the requirements were highly specialized, or the competition did not drive prices down as much as anticipated for this particular item.

What does the NAICS code '337211' signify for this contract?

The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code '337211' signifies 'Wood Office Furniture Manufacturing'. This code indicates that the primary business activity of the contractor, Raynor Marketing Ltd., in relation to this contract, is the manufacturing of office furniture made from wood. This classification helps in understanding the specific industry segment the contract falls into and allows for comparisons with other government procurements within the same industry. It suggests that the chairs being procured are likely constructed with wood components, potentially influencing their durability, aesthetics, and cost compared to chairs made from metal or plastic.

What is the significance of the 'BPA CALL' award type?

A 'BPA CALL' signifies that this contract was awarded as a call order against a Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA). A BPA is a simplified acquisition method that allows federal agencies to fill anticipated repetitive needs for supplies or services by establishing charge accounts with qualified sources of supply. Essentially, it's a pre-negotiated agreement that streamlines the ordering process for specific items or services. A 'call order' is then placed against this established BPA. This method is often used for recurring purchases, offering convenience and potentially better pricing due to pre-negotiated terms. For taxpayers, it can mean faster delivery and potentially more consistent pricing, but the underlying competitiveness of the original BPA is crucial for ensuring value.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Manufacturing › Office Furniture (including Fixtures) Manufacturing › Wood Office Furniture Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: FURNITURE

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 525 HEMPSTEAD TURNPIKE, WEST HEMPSTEAD, NY, 11552

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $2,455

Exercised Options: $2,455

Current Obligation: $2,455

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QSSC25A0007

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline