GSA awards $8,384 contract for weapon cleaning kits to M-80 Systems, Inc

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $8,384 ($8.4K)

Contractor: M-80 Systems, Inc.

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2026-04-01

End Date: 2026-04-04

Contract Duration: 3 days

Daily Burn Rate: $2.8K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: TOOL KIT, WEAPONS CLEANING: - SEE ATTACHED DOCUMENT FOR DETAIL.

Place of Performance

Location: AIEA, HONOLULU County, HAWAII, 96701

State: Hawaii Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $8,384.4 to M-80 SYSTEMS, INC. for work described as: TOOL KIT, WEAPONS CLEANING: - SEE ATTACHED DOCUMENT FOR DETAIL. Key points: 1. Contract value is relatively small, suggesting a niche or specialized requirement. 2. The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating a competitive market. 3. The short duration (3 days) points to an immediate or urgent need. 4. The award is a delivery order, implying it's part of a larger contract vehicle. 5. The fixed-price contract type shifts risk to the contractor. 6. The contractor, M-80 Systems, Inc., is a new awardee for this specific product category.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $8,384.40 is modest. Without specific details on the quantity and type of cleaning kits, a direct value-for-money assessment is challenging. However, the award being a delivery order suggests it might be competitively priced within a broader contract. Benchmarking against similar small-value procurements for specialized cleaning supplies would be necessary for a more precise valuation.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources,' which typically means that proposals were solicited from all responsible sources, but certain sources were excluded from the initial solicitation, possibly due to specific requirements or existing contracts. The presence of two bids suggests some level of competition, but the exclusion of sources might limit the breadth of competition.

Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by encouraging competitive pricing and potentially leading to better value. However, the exclusion of sources warrants further investigation to ensure no potentially lower-cost or higher-quality options were overlooked.

Public Impact

Military or law enforcement personnel requiring specialized cleaning equipment for weapons. Ensures operational readiness by providing necessary maintenance supplies. The contract's geographic impact is limited to Hawaii, where the delivery order is to be fulfilled. Potential impact on the supply chain for defense-related maintenance materials.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

The exclusion of sources in the competition process could limit overall market engagement and potentially impact price discovery.
The very short performance period (3 days) might indicate a rushed procurement or an urgent need, which can sometimes lead to less favorable pricing.
Lack of detailed product specifications in the provided data makes it difficult to assess if the procured items meet all necessary technical requirements.

Positive Signals

The use of a firm-fixed-price contract protects the government from cost overruns.
Awarding under full and open competition, even with exclusions, suggests an effort to engage the market.
The contract is managed by the General Services Administration (GSA), a reputable agency for federal procurement.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the broader defense and security sector, specifically related to the maintenance and readiness of military or law enforcement equipment. The market for specialized cleaning kits is likely fragmented, with various manufacturers and distributors. The total federal spending on such niche items is difficult to benchmark without more specific product details, but it represents a small component of overall defense logistics spending.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not specifically set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, the primary impact on small businesses would be through potential subcontracting opportunities, which are not detailed here. The awardee, M-80 Systems, Inc., is not identified by size, so its status as a small or large business is unknown.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the General Services Administration (GSA), specifically its Federal Acquisition Service. As a delivery order under a larger contract vehicle, the terms and conditions of that parent contract would also apply. Transparency is limited by the provided data; further details would be available through GSA's contract management systems. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

Military Weapon Maintenance Supplies
Defense Logistics Agency Procurement
General Services Administration Schedules
Tactical Equipment Procurement

Risk Flags

Limited Competition Due to Source Exclusions
Urgent Need Indicated by Short Performance Period
Lack of Detailed Product Specifications

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $8,384.4 to M-80 SYSTEMS, INC.. TOOL KIT, WEAPONS CLEANING: - SEE ATTACHED DOCUMENT FOR DETAIL.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is M-80 SYSTEMS, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $8,384.4.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-01. End: 2026-04-04.

What is the specific nature and quantity of the 'TOOL KIT, WEAPONS CLEANING' being procured?

The provided data indicates the item is a 'TOOL KIT, WEAPONS CLEANING' but lacks specific details regarding the exact contents, quantity, and technical specifications. The abbreviation 'SEE ATTACHED DOCUMENT FOR DETAIL' suggests that a separate document contains this crucial information. Without access to that document, it is impossible to ascertain the precise nature of the goods, their intended use, or the quantity being purchased. This lack of detail hinders a thorough assessment of the contract's value, necessity, and suitability for the intended purpose.

How does the price of $8,384.40 compare to market rates for similar weapon cleaning kits?

A direct comparison of the total contract value ($8,384.40) to market rates is challenging without knowing the quantity and specific components of the weapon cleaning kits. If this is for a large quantity of high-end kits, it could represent a good deal; if it's for a small number of basic kits, it might be high. Benchmarking would require identifying comparable kits (e.g., by manufacturer, included tools, caliber compatibility) and their unit prices from commercial vendors or other government contracts. The fact that it's a delivery order under a larger contract suggests it may have undergone some level of pre-negotiated pricing, but the specific value-for-money still depends heavily on the specifics of the items procured.

What are the specific 'exclusions of sources' in this 'Full and Open Competition' award, and why were they excluded?

The designation 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' implies that while the competition was intended to be broad, certain potential bidders were deliberately excluded from the solicitation process. The reasons for exclusion are not provided in the summary data but could include factors such as failure to meet specific pre-qualification criteria, past performance issues, inability to meet unique technical requirements, or participation in a specific contract vehicle that limits broader solicitation. Understanding these exclusions is critical to assessing whether the competition was truly robust and if the government secured the best possible value by potentially limiting the pool of bidders.

What is the track record of M-80 Systems, Inc. in supplying similar defense or cleaning equipment to the federal government?

Information regarding the track record of M-80 Systems, Inc. in supplying similar defense or cleaning equipment to the federal government is not provided in the summary data. As this is a delivery order, it suggests M-80 Systems, Inc. may already hold a position on a larger contract vehicle. Further investigation into the contractor's past performance, including previous awards, delivery history, and quality ratings on similar contracts, would be necessary to assess their reliability and capability for this specific procurement. Without this context, it's difficult to evaluate the risk associated with this awardee.

What is the significance of the extremely short performance period (April 1-4, 2026)?

The performance period for this contract is exceptionally short, spanning only three days (April 1-4, 2026). This suggests an urgent or immediate need for the weapon cleaning kits. Such short windows can sometimes indicate emergency requirements, last-minute fulfillment of operational needs, or the need to quickly deplete stock before a certain date. From a taxpayer perspective, urgent needs can sometimes lead to premium pricing if expedited shipping or handling is required, although the firm-fixed-price nature of this contract shifts some of that risk to the contractor. It also implies a need for rapid delivery and processing by both the contractor and the receiving agency.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Transportation and Warehousing › Warehousing and Storage › Other Warehousing and Storage

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 2

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 176 W MARINE CORPS DR, ASAN, GU, 96910

Business Categories: Asian Pacific American Owned Business, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Economically Disadvantaged Women Owned Small Business, HUBZone Firm, Minority Owned Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business, Women Owned Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $8,384

Exercised Options: $8,384

Current Obligation: $8,384

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QSCC21D0003

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline