DOJ's FBI Spends $27.2M on SAVA Workforce Solutions for Office Admin Services
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $27,251,714 ($27.3M)
Contractor: Sava Workforce Solutions LLC
Awarding Agency: Department of Justice
Start Date: 2012-03-27
End Date: 2013-03-31
Contract Duration: 369 days
Daily Burn Rate: $73.9K/day
Competition Type: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS
Sector: Other
Official Description: IGF::CT::IGF SERVICE SUPPORT FOR TSC
Place of Performance
Location: ARLINGTON, ARLINGTON County, VIRGINIA, 22202
State: Virginia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Justice obligated $27.3 million to SAVA WORKFORCE SOLUTIONS LLC for work described as: IGF::CT::IGF SERVICE SUPPORT FOR TSC Key points: 1. High contract value of $27.2M for administrative services. 2. Sole-source award indicates limited competition. 3. Potential risk associated with single vendor reliance. 4. IT/Professional Services sector, specifically administrative support.
Value Assessment
Rating: questionable
The contract value of $27.2M for office administrative services is substantial. Without comparable contract data or a clear justification for the pricing structure, it is difficult to assess its value against market rates or similar government contracts.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: sole-source
The contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, meaning there was no open competition. This limits price discovery and may result in higher costs for taxpayers compared to a competitive procurement.
Taxpayer Impact: The sole-source nature of this award raises concerns about whether the government obtained the best possible price for these administrative services.
Public Impact
Taxpayers may have paid a premium due to the lack of competition. Reliance on a single vendor could impact service continuity if issues arise. The FBI's operational efficiency could be affected by the quality of administrative support.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Sole-source award
- Lack of competition
- High contract value
Positive Signals
- Contract awarded to a specific vendor
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services sector, specifically focusing on office administrative support. Benchmarks for administrative services can vary widely based on scope and location, but large sole-source awards warrant scrutiny.
Small Business Impact
The data does not indicate whether small businesses were involved as subcontractors or if this contract offered opportunities for small business participation. Sole-source awards often bypass opportunities for small business engagement.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight mechanisms for sole-source contracts are crucial to ensure fair pricing and adequate performance. The FBI should have internal controls and reporting to monitor this contract's effectiveness and cost.
Related Government Programs
- Office Administrative Services
- Department of Justice Contracting
- Federal Bureau of Investigation Programs
Risk Flags
- Sole-source award lacks competition.
- Potential for inflated pricing due to lack of competition.
- Risk of vendor lock-in and service disruption.
- Limited transparency on pricing justification.
- No clear indication of small business participation.
Tags
office-administrative-services, department-of-justice, va, do, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Justice awarded $27.3 million to SAVA WORKFORCE SOLUTIONS LLC. IGF::CT::IGF SERVICE SUPPORT FOR TSC
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is SAVA WORKFORCE SOLUTIONS LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Justice (Federal Bureau of Investigation).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $27.3 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2012-03-27. End: 2013-03-31.
What was the justification for the sole-source award, and how was the price determined to be fair and reasonable?
The justification for a sole-source award is critical for understanding why competition was not pursued. Agencies must demonstrate that only one responsible source can satisfy the agency's needs. The process for determining fair and reasonable pricing in sole-source situations typically involves detailed cost analysis, comparison to historical data, or market research, but without this information, the pricing's validity remains uncertain.
What are the risks associated with relying on a single vendor for essential administrative services over an extended period?
Relying on a single vendor for essential administrative services presents several risks. These include potential price increases over time without competitive pressure, reduced incentive for the vendor to innovate or improve service quality, and significant disruption if the vendor fails to perform, faces financial instability, or terminates the contract. Vendor lock-in can also make transitioning to a new provider difficult and costly.
How does the quality and cost of these administrative services compare to industry standards or similar government contracts?
Without specific performance metrics and detailed cost breakdowns, a direct comparison is challenging. However, the substantial $27.2M value and sole-source nature suggest a potential for higher costs than competitively procured services. A thorough review would require access to the contract's statement of work, performance reviews, and pricing details to benchmark against similar government or commercial contracts.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Office Administrative Services › Office Administrative Services
Product/Service Code: INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY EQUIPMENT (INCLD FIRMWARE) SOFTWARE,SUPPLIES& SUPPORT EQUIPMENT
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS (Z)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Nana Regional Corporation Inc (UEI: 079253761)
Address: 13873 PARK CENTER RD STE 400 N, HERNDON, VA, 11
Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Alaskan Native Corporation Owned Firm, Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $27,251,714
Exercised Options: $27,251,714
Current Obligation: $27,251,714
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: DJFJFBI09067
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2012-03-27
Current End Date: 2013-03-31
Potential End Date: 2013-03-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2013-05-21
More Contracts from Sava Workforce Solutions LLC
- Enterprise Operations&maintenance (O&M) IT Support Services — $193.8M (Department of Justice)
- IT Support Services — $62.9M (Department of Justice)
- 561210 Facilities Support Services — $30.2M (Department of Justice)
- 0200 Operational Support — $21.3M (Department of Justice)
- 0200 IT Admin Support — $19.1M (Department of Justice)
Other Department of Justice Contracts
- Contractor Owned and Operated Existing Correctional Facility for Approximately 3,500 LOW Security Male Inmates — $794.5M (Cornell Companies, Inc.)
- Detention Services - SAN Diego — $776.9M (THE GEO Group, Inc.)
- CO: Telly Renfroe Award of NEW Task Order Base Year Initial Funding — $616.4M (AT&T Enterprises, LLC)
- TAS 151060 - Services for the Management and Operation of a Contractor-Owned, Contractor-Operated, Correctional Facility for 2,567 Beds in Adams County, Mississippi — $574.3M (Corecivic, Inc.)
- Provide Services for the Management and Operation of a Correctional Facility in Accordance With Rfp-Pcc-0014 — $568.9M (Cornell Companies, Inc.)