DOJ's FBI Spends $27.2M on SAVA Workforce Solutions for Office Admin Services

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $27,251,714 ($27.3M)

Contractor: Sava Workforce Solutions LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Justice

Start Date: 2012-03-27

End Date: 2013-03-31

Contract Duration: 369 days

Daily Burn Rate: $73.9K/day

Competition Type: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS

Sector: Other

Official Description: IGF::CT::IGF SERVICE SUPPORT FOR TSC

Place of Performance

Location: ARLINGTON, ARLINGTON County, VIRGINIA, 22202

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Justice obligated $27.3 million to SAVA WORKFORCE SOLUTIONS LLC for work described as: IGF::CT::IGF SERVICE SUPPORT FOR TSC Key points: 1. High contract value of $27.2M for administrative services. 2. Sole-source award indicates limited competition. 3. Potential risk associated with single vendor reliance. 4. IT/Professional Services sector, specifically administrative support.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract value of $27.2M for office administrative services is substantial. Without comparable contract data or a clear justification for the pricing structure, it is difficult to assess its value against market rates or similar government contracts.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

The contract was awarded on a sole-source basis, meaning there was no open competition. This limits price discovery and may result in higher costs for taxpayers compared to a competitive procurement.

Taxpayer Impact: The sole-source nature of this award raises concerns about whether the government obtained the best possible price for these administrative services.

Public Impact

Taxpayers may have paid a premium due to the lack of competition. Reliance on a single vendor could impact service continuity if issues arise. The FBI's operational efficiency could be affected by the quality of administrative support.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Sole-source award
  • Lack of competition
  • High contract value

Positive Signals

  • Contract awarded to a specific vendor

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services sector, specifically focusing on office administrative support. Benchmarks for administrative services can vary widely based on scope and location, but large sole-source awards warrant scrutiny.

Small Business Impact

The data does not indicate whether small businesses were involved as subcontractors or if this contract offered opportunities for small business participation. Sole-source awards often bypass opportunities for small business engagement.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight mechanisms for sole-source contracts are crucial to ensure fair pricing and adequate performance. The FBI should have internal controls and reporting to monitor this contract's effectiveness and cost.

Related Government Programs

  • Office Administrative Services
  • Department of Justice Contracting
  • Federal Bureau of Investigation Programs

Risk Flags

  • Sole-source award lacks competition.
  • Potential for inflated pricing due to lack of competition.
  • Risk of vendor lock-in and service disruption.
  • Limited transparency on pricing justification.
  • No clear indication of small business participation.

Tags

office-administrative-services, department-of-justice, va, do, 10m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Justice awarded $27.3 million to SAVA WORKFORCE SOLUTIONS LLC. IGF::CT::IGF SERVICE SUPPORT FOR TSC

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is SAVA WORKFORCE SOLUTIONS LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Justice (Federal Bureau of Investigation).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $27.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2012-03-27. End: 2013-03-31.

What was the justification for the sole-source award, and how was the price determined to be fair and reasonable?

The justification for a sole-source award is critical for understanding why competition was not pursued. Agencies must demonstrate that only one responsible source can satisfy the agency's needs. The process for determining fair and reasonable pricing in sole-source situations typically involves detailed cost analysis, comparison to historical data, or market research, but without this information, the pricing's validity remains uncertain.

What are the risks associated with relying on a single vendor for essential administrative services over an extended period?

Relying on a single vendor for essential administrative services presents several risks. These include potential price increases over time without competitive pressure, reduced incentive for the vendor to innovate or improve service quality, and significant disruption if the vendor fails to perform, faces financial instability, or terminates the contract. Vendor lock-in can also make transitioning to a new provider difficult and costly.

How does the quality and cost of these administrative services compare to industry standards or similar government contracts?

Without specific performance metrics and detailed cost breakdowns, a direct comparison is challenging. However, the substantial $27.2M value and sole-source nature suggest a potential for higher costs than competitively procured services. A thorough review would require access to the contract's statement of work, performance reviews, and pricing details to benchmark against similar government or commercial contracts.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation ServicesOffice Administrative ServicesOffice Administrative Services

Product/Service Code: INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY EQUIPMENT (INCLD FIRMWARE) SOFTWARE,SUPPLIES& SUPPORT EQUIPMENT

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS (Z)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Nana Regional Corporation Inc (UEI: 079253761)

Address: 13873 PARK CENTER RD STE 400 N, HERNDON, VA, 11

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Alaskan Native Corporation Owned Firm, Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $27,251,714

Exercised Options: $27,251,714

Current Obligation: $27,251,714

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: DJFJFBI09067

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline

Start Date: 2012-03-27

Current End Date: 2013-03-31

Potential End Date: 2013-03-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2013-05-21

More Contracts from Sava Workforce Solutions LLC

View all Sava Workforce Solutions LLC federal contracts →

Other Department of Justice Contracts

View all Department of Justice contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending