GSA Awards $537,900 Contract for Absorbent Material to Mono Machines LLC Under Full and Open Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $5,379 ($5.4K)

Contractor: Mono Machines LLC

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2026-04-09

End Date: 2026-04-15

Contract Duration: 6 days

Daily Burn Rate: $897/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 8

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE WITH ECONOMIC PRICE ADJUSTMENT

Sector: Other

Official Description: ABSORBENT MATERIAL, OILAND WATER: ABSORBENT MATERIAL USED FOR THE UNIVERSAL ABSORBENCY OF WATER, OIL, AND SOLVENTS. ONEHUNDRED FIFTY (150) FEETX THIRTY (30) INCH ROLL...

Place of Performance

Location: NEW YORK, NEW YORK County, NEW YORK, 10003

State: New York Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $5,379 to MONO MACHINES LLC for work described as: ABSORBENT MATERIAL, OILAND WATER: ABSORBENT MATERIAL USED FOR THE UNIVERSAL ABSORBENCY OF WATER, OIL, AND SOLVENTS. ONEHUNDRED FIFTY (150) FEETX THIRTY (30) INCH ROLL... Key points: 1. The contract is for absorbent material used for universal absorbency of water, oil, and solvents. 2. Mono Machines LLC was awarded the contract, which has a duration of 6 months. 3. The contract was awarded through full and open competition, indicating a competitive bidding process. 4. The total value of the contract is $537,900.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract is a fixed-price with economic price adjustment type, which can lead to price volatility. Without specific unit cost data or comparison to similar contracts, a precise pricing assessment is difficult.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a robust price discovery process. The use of a BPA Call indicates a pre-competed agreement, potentially streamlining the process but requiring careful review of the underlying BPA terms.

Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award is positive for taxpayers, aiming to secure the best possible price. However, the economic price adjustment clause introduces potential for cost increases over the contract term.

Public Impact

Ensures availability of essential spill containment materials for federal agencies. Supports agency operations by providing necessary supplies for environmental safety. The contract value of $537,900 reflects a significant investment in operational readiness. Procurement through GSA's Federal Acquisition Service aims for efficiency and cost-effectiveness.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Economic price adjustment clause could lead to cost overruns.
Short contract duration (6 months) may necessitate frequent re-competition.
No specific mention of sustainability or environmental impact of the absorbent material.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition.
Procured through GSA, a centralized procurement authority.
Addresses a critical operational need for federal agencies.

Sector Analysis

The procurement falls under the 'Saw Blade and Handtool Manufacturing' NAICS code (332216), though the product is absorbent material. This suggests a potential misclassification or a broad interpretation of the NAICS code. Spending benchmarks for absorbent materials are not directly comparable to handtool manufacturing.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small business participation was not a factor in this specific award (sb: false). Further analysis would be needed to determine if this contract opportunity was adequately advertised to small businesses or if there are broader trends in GSA's procurement regarding small business inclusion for similar items.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was awarded by the General Services Administration (GSA), a key federal agency responsible for procurement oversight. The use of a BPA Call suggests adherence to established procurement procedures, but the specific oversight mechanisms for this call and the economic price adjustment clause warrant attention.

Related Government Programs

Saw Blade and Handtool Manufacturing
General Services Administration Contracting
Federal Acquisition Service Programs

Risk Flags

Economic Price Adjustment (EPA) clause introduces cost uncertainty.
Short contract duration (6 months) may limit competition and require frequent re-procurement.
Potential NAICS code misclassification requires clarification.
Lack of specific unit pricing data hinders detailed value assessment.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $5,379 to MONO MACHINES LLC. ABSORBENT MATERIAL, OILAND WATER: ABSORBENT MATERIAL USED FOR THE UNIVERSAL ABSORBENCY OF WATER, OIL, AND SOLVENTS. ONEHUNDRED FIFTY (150) FEETX THIRTY (30) INCH ROLL...

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is MONO MACHINES LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $5,379.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-09. End: 2026-04-15.

What is the specific unit cost of the absorbent material and how does it compare to market rates for similar products?

The provided data does not include specific unit cost details for the absorbent material, only the total contract value. A thorough analysis would require obtaining itemized pricing and benchmarking it against industry standards and prices paid by other government agencies or commercial entities for comparable absorbent products to ensure fair and reasonable pricing.

What are the potential risks associated with the 'FIXED PRICE WITH ECONOMIC PRICE ADJUSTMENT' contract type for this absorbent material?

The primary risk of an economic price adjustment (EPA) clause is that the government may end up paying more than initially anticipated if the costs of raw materials or labor increase significantly. For absorbent materials, this could be tied to the price of polymers or manufacturing inputs, potentially leading to budget overruns and reduced value for taxpayer dollars if not carefully monitored and capped.

How effective is the 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION' method in ensuring the best value for absorbent materials, considering the short contract duration?

Full and open competition is generally effective in driving down prices and ensuring a wide range of solutions. However, the short 6-month duration might limit the number of bidders willing to invest in a proposal for a short-term need, potentially reducing the competitive intensity. It also necessitates frequent re-competition, which can be administratively burdensome and may not allow for long-term supplier relationships or economies of scale.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Manufacturing › Cutlery and Handtool Manufacturing › Saw Blade and Handtool Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: HOUSEHOLD/COMMERC FURNISH/APPLIANCE

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 8

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE WITH ECONOMIC PRICE ADJUSTMENT (K)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 2455 DILLON RD, WHITEFISH, MT, 59937

Business Categories: Category Business, Hispanic American Owned Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $5,379

Exercised Options: $5,379

Current Obligation: $5,379

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QSWA23A001Y

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline