GSA awards $6,717 contract for dishwashing compound, highlighting a fixed-price structure with economic adjustments
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $6,717 ($6.7K)
Contractor: Mono Machines LLC
Awarding Agency: General Services Administration
Start Date: 2026-04-09
End Date: 2026-04-15
Contract Duration: 6 days
Daily Burn Rate: $1.1K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 9
Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE WITH ECONOMIC PRICE ADJUSTMENT
Sector: Other
Official Description: DISHWASHING COMPOUND, HAND: MANUAL DETERGENT FOR WASHING POTS AND PANS.THREE (3) EACH, TWO (2)POUND CONTAINERS PER BOX...
Place of Performance
Location: NEW YORK, NEW YORK County, NEW YORK, 10003
State: New York Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
General Services Administration obligated $6,717 to MONO MACHINES LLC for work described as: DISHWASHING COMPOUND, HAND: MANUAL DETERGENT FOR WASHING POTS AND PANS.THREE (3) EACH, TWO (2)POUND CONTAINERS PER BOX... Key points: 1. The contract utilizes a fixed-price structure with economic price adjustments, which can help mitigate inflation risks for the government. 2. Awarded via BPA Call, suggesting a pre-negotiated agreement that streamlines the procurement process. 3. The short duration of the contract (6 months) indicates a need for immediate supply or a pilot program. 4. The supplier, MONO MACHINES LLC, is a new entrant for this specific product category based on available data. 5. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 332216 points to the manufacturing of handtools, which may include cleaning supplies. 6. The contract is not set aside for small businesses, indicating a broader competition scope.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $6,717 for dishwashing compound appears to be for a relatively small quantity, given the unit description of three 2-pound containers per box. Without knowing the exact quantity of boxes, a direct value-for-money assessment is challenging. However, the fixed-price with economic adjustment clause suggests an attempt to manage cost fluctuations. Benchmarking against similar federal contracts for cleaning supplies would be necessary for a more precise valuation.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit offers. The award was made via a Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) Call, which implies that a broader BPA was previously established through full and open competition, and this call is a specific order against that agreement. The number of bids received (9) suggests a reasonable level of interest and competition for this specific requirement.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally leads to better price discovery and potentially lower costs for taxpayers by encouraging multiple vendors to offer their best pricing.
Public Impact
Federal agencies requiring manual dishwashing detergents for pots and pans will benefit from this contract. The service delivered is the provision of essential cleaning supplies for food service operations within government facilities. The contract is geographically focused on New York (NY), indicating the delivery location for these supplies. Workforce implications are minimal, primarily related to the logistics of supply chain management and delivery.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for price volatility due to the economic price adjustment clause, which could increase costs if raw material prices rise significantly.
- Limited contract duration may necessitate a quick re-competition or extension, potentially leading to administrative overhead.
- Dependence on a single supplier for this specific product could pose a risk if supply chain disruptions occur.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition, ensuring a competitive marketplace for this product.
- The use of a BPA Call suggests an efficient procurement mechanism already in place.
- Fixed-price element provides a baseline cost certainty for the government.
Sector Analysis
The market for cleaning and sanitation supplies is a mature and competitive sector within the broader industrial and commercial products industry. Federal agencies are significant consumers of these goods, often procuring them through large-scale contracts and agreements like BPAs. The NAICS code 332216, while specific to handtool manufacturing, can encompass related cleaning implements. Spending benchmarks for janitorial and cleaning supplies within the federal government vary widely based on agency size and mission, but this specific contract for dishwashing compound represents a niche requirement within that larger spending category.
Small Business Impact
This contract was not set aside for small businesses, as indicated by the 'sb: false' field. This means that both large and small businesses were eligible to compete. There is no explicit mention of subcontracting requirements for small businesses within the provided data. The lack of a small business set-aside suggests that the procurement was likely driven by the nature of the product or the anticipated volume, where larger suppliers may have a competitive advantage, or simply that the competition was open to all responsible sources.
Oversight & Accountability
The General Services Administration (GSA) Federal Acquisition Service (FAS) is responsible for overseeing this contract. Oversight mechanisms would typically include contract performance monitoring, invoice verification, and adherence to the terms and conditions of the BPA Call. Accountability is maintained through the contractual agreement and GSA's procurement regulations. Transparency is generally provided through federal procurement databases like FPDS. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of suspected fraud, waste, or abuse related to the contract.
Related Government Programs
- General Services Administration (GSA) Federal Supply Schedule (FSS) contracts
- Department of Defense (DoD) cleaning and sanitation supply procurements
- Janitorial and Sanitation Supplies
- Food Service Equipment and Supplies
Risk Flags
- Economic Price Adjustment Clause Risk
- Limited Contract Duration
- Potential Supply Chain Dependency
Tags
cleaning-supplies, dishwashing-compound, general-services-administration, bpa-call, fixed-price-economic-price-adjustment, full-and-open-competition, new-york, small-contract-value, industrial-supplies, procurement-efficiency
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
General Services Administration awarded $6,717 to MONO MACHINES LLC. DISHWASHING COMPOUND, HAND: MANUAL DETERGENT FOR WASHING POTS AND PANS.THREE (3) EACH, TWO (2)POUND CONTAINERS PER BOX...
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is MONO MACHINES LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $6,717.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2026-04-09. End: 2026-04-15.
What is the historical spending pattern for this specific dishwashing compound or similar products by the General Services Administration?
Analyzing historical spending patterns for this specific dishwashing compound by the GSA requires access to detailed procurement data beyond the scope of this single award. Typically, one would look at previous contract awards for the same or similar National Stock Numbers (NSNs) or product descriptions, noting the awarded contractors, quantities, prices, and contract types over several fiscal years. For instance, if GSA has consistently awarded contracts for this item every year, it indicates a sustained demand. A review might reveal if prices have trended upwards or downwards, or if there have been shifts in awarded contractors, potentially signaling changes in market competition or supplier performance. Without this historical context, it's difficult to ascertain if the current $6,717 award represents a typical expenditure or an anomaly.
How does the unit price of this dishwashing compound compare to market rates or similar federal contracts?
Determining the precise unit price for this dishwashing compound is challenging without knowing the exact number of 'boxes' included in the $6,717 award, as the description specifies 'THREE (3) EACH, TWO (2)POUND CONTAINERS PER BOX'. If, for example, the contract was for 100 boxes, the price per box would be $67.17, and the price per 2-pound container would be approximately $22.39. To compare this to market rates, one would research prices for similar industrial-strength dishwashing detergents from major suppliers (e.g., Sysco, US Foods, or direct manufacturers) or check federal procurement databases for recent awards of comparable items. Benchmarking against contracts awarded under similar conditions (e.g., full and open competition, fixed-price) by agencies like the GSA or DoD would provide a more direct comparison. A significantly higher or lower price than benchmarks could indicate issues with value for money or exceptional negotiation.
What is the track record of MONO MACHINES LLC in supplying federal agencies, particularly with cleaning supplies?
Information regarding the track record of MONO MACHINES LLC in supplying federal agencies, especially with cleaning supplies, would typically be found by searching federal procurement databases such as the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS) or SAM.gov. This search would reveal past contract awards, their values, performance ratings (if available), and the types of products or services provided. If MONO MACHINES LLC has a history of successful, on-time deliveries and positive performance feedback on similar contracts, it suggests reliability. Conversely, a history of contract terminations, disputes, or poor performance ratings would raise concerns. Given the limited information provided, it's assumed this might be an initial or less frequent award for this specific product category, necessitating further due diligence on the contractor's broader federal performance history.
What are the potential risks associated with the 'Economic Price Adjustment' clause in this contract?
The 'Economic Price Adjustment' (EPA) clause in this contract allows for modifications to the contract price based on fluctuations in specified economic factors, typically related to the cost of labor or materials. The primary risk for the government is potential cost increases if the underlying economic indicators rise significantly during the contract period. While EPA clauses are intended to protect contractors from unforeseen cost increases and ensure fair pricing, they can introduce budget uncertainty for the government. The specific risk depends on the index used for adjustment, the frequency of adjustments, and the caps or floors, if any, stipulated in the clause. Without the exact EPA terms, it's difficult to quantify the exact risk, but it necessitates monitoring economic trends relevant to the product's components.
How does the BPA Call mechanism impact the efficiency and cost-effectiveness of this procurement compared to a traditional solicitation?
A Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) Call, like the one used here, is generally more efficient and cost-effective than a traditional solicitation for recurring needs. A BPA is a simplified way to fill anticipated repetitive needs for supplies or services by establishing 'charge accounts' with qualified sources. Once a BPA is established (often through full and open competition), individual calls or orders against it can be placed more rapidly, with less administrative burden. This reduces procurement lead times and associated administrative costs. For the government, it means faster access to needed supplies. For contractors, it can provide a more predictable stream of business. The cost-effectiveness stems from streamlined ordering processes and potentially leveraging pre-negotiated pricing from the underlying BPA, although the specific pricing on the call is still subject to competition or established terms.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Manufacturing › Cutlery and Handtool Manufacturing › Saw Blade and Handtool Manufacturing
Product/Service Code: CLEANING EQPT AND SUPPLIES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Offers Received: 9
Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE WITH ECONOMIC PRICE ADJUSTMENT (K)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 2455 DILLON RD, WHITEFISH, MT, 59937
Business Categories: Category Business, Hispanic American Owned Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $6,717
Exercised Options: $6,717
Current Obligation: $6,717
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: 47QSWA23A001X
IDV Type: BPA
Timeline
Start Date: 2026-04-09
Current End Date: 2026-04-15
Potential End Date: 2026-04-15 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-04-10
More Contracts from Mono Machines LLC
- FY25 RQN for DBA Supply Chimp for Office Supplies and Telework Equipment — $57.2K (Department of Justice)
- FY26 C1 Midstates Jt-Toilet Paper MAR 26 — $30.0K (Department of Justice)
- Paper, Copying, Xerographic Process: - SEE Attached Document for Detail — $27.3K (General Services Administration)
- P/N: 7490013953263-2GIT Shredding Machine, Paper — $22.5K (General Services Administration)
- Board,Marker — $13.1K (General Services Administration)
Other General Services Administration Contracts
- Software Life Cycle Development — $1.4B (Science Applications International Corporation)
- Task Order (TO) 47qfca21f0018 IS Hereby Awarded to Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc. (BAH) to Provide Enterprise Level Data to the Ousd(c), and ITS Strategic Partners (I.E., DOD Fourth Estate, DOD Departments, and IC Community) — $1.4B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)
- Federal Contract — $1.2B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)
- THE Scope of the to IS to Provide Enterprise IT Services for the Usace — $1.1B (Science Applications International Corporation)
- Task Order Award — $1.1B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)