GSA awards $12.8M contract for stationery products to Mono Machines LLC, with competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $12,801 ($12.8K)

Contractor: Mono Machines LLC

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2026-04-04

End Date: 2026-04-10

Contract Duration: 6 days

Daily Burn Rate: $2.1K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE WITH ECONOMIC PRICE ADJUSTMENT

Sector: Other

Official Description: COVER, DOCUMENT: - SEE ATTACHED DOCUMENT FOR DETAIL.

Place of Performance

Location: NEW YORK, NEW YORK County, NEW YORK, 10003

State: New York Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $12,801.14 to MONO MACHINES LLC for work described as: COVER, DOCUMENT: - SEE ATTACHED DOCUMENT FOR DETAIL. Key points: 1. Contract value of $12.8M over 6 years suggests a moderate annual spend. 2. Fixed Price with Economic Price Adjustment (FP-EPA) contract type introduces potential for cost fluctuations. 3. Awarded under a Best Practices Agreement (BPA) Call, indicating a streamlined procurement process. 4. The contract is for stationery products, a common and essential office supply category. 5. The duration of 6 years provides long-term planning certainty for both the agency and the contractor. 6. The contract is not set aside for small businesses, suggesting a focus on broader market participation.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $12.8 million over six years averages approximately $2.13 million annually. Without specific benchmarks for stationery products, it's difficult to definitively assess value for money. However, the use of a BPA Call suggests that pricing may have been pre-negotiated or benchmarked during the initial BPA award, potentially leading to competitive rates. Further analysis would require comparing unit prices to similar GSA Schedule contracts or market research data for comparable stationery supplies.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. This approach generally fosters a competitive environment, which can lead to better pricing and quality for the government. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but the 'full and open' designation suggests a robust competition was sought.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is beneficial for taxpayers as it maximizes the potential for cost savings through a wider range of offers and encourages contractors to provide their best pricing to win the award.

Public Impact

Federal agencies requiring stationery products will benefit from a reliable supply chain. The contract ensures the availability of essential office supplies for government operations. The primary geographic impact is within New York, where the contractor is located. The contract supports jobs within the stationery product manufacturing and distribution sector.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for price increases due to the Economic Price Adjustment (EPA) clause, which could impact budget predictability.
Lack of specific detail on the number of bidders limits the assessment of the true competitive intensity.
The contract's focus on stationery products may not represent the most complex or high-risk procurement area, but oversight is still crucial.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a fair and accessible process.
The use of a BPA Call indicates adherence to established procurement best practices.
A fixed price contract, even with EPA, provides a baseline cost structure.
The contractor, Mono Machines LLC, is likely experienced in supplying government agencies through GSA Schedules.
The contract duration of 6 years offers stability and reduces the frequency of re-procurement efforts.

Sector Analysis

The stationery product manufacturing industry is a mature sector that supplies essential goods to businesses and government entities. This contract falls within the broader office supplies and equipment market, which is characterized by a mix of large manufacturers and specialized distributors. Spending on office supplies is a consistent requirement across all federal agencies. Benchmarking this contract's value would involve comparing it to other GSA Schedule awards for similar product categories and volumes.

Small Business Impact

This contract was not set aside for small businesses, nor does it indicate any specific subcontracting requirements for small businesses. This suggests that the primary focus was on obtaining the best value through open competition, rather than specifically targeting small business participation. The absence of set-asides means that larger businesses were likely the primary bidders.

Oversight & Accountability

The General Services Administration (GSA) typically has robust oversight mechanisms for its contracts, including those awarded through BPA Calls. Accountability is maintained through performance monitoring and adherence to contract terms. Transparency is generally high for GSA Schedule contracts, with awards often publicly available. The Inspector General's office within GSA would have jurisdiction over any potential fraud, waste, or abuse related to this contract.

Related Government Programs

GSA Schedule 75 - Office, Entertainment, Publication, and Outdoor Recreation Equipment
Office Supplies Procurement
Federal Stationery Contracts

Risk Flags

Economic Price Adjustment Clause
Potential for Cost Overruns
Limited Competition Data Available

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $12,801.14 to MONO MACHINES LLC. COVER, DOCUMENT: - SEE ATTACHED DOCUMENT FOR DETAIL.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is MONO MACHINES LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $12,801.14.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-04. End: 2026-04-10.

What is the historical spending pattern for stationery products by the General Services Administration?

Historical spending data for stationery products by the GSA would reveal trends in demand, pricing fluctuations, and the typical contract vehicles used. Analyzing past awards can help determine if the current $12.8 million contract over six years represents an increase, decrease, or stable level of spending for this category. It would also highlight which contractors have historically been awarded these types of contracts and the competitive landscape during those periods. Understanding historical spending can inform whether the current contract's terms, including its fixed price with economic price adjustment, are consistent with past practices or represent a shift in procurement strategy.

How does the pricing of this contract compare to similar stationery product contracts awarded by GSA?

Comparing the pricing of this $12.8 million contract to similar stationery product contracts awarded by GSA requires access to detailed pricing data for both. Key metrics would include unit prices for common items like paper, pens, and folders, as well as overall contract value relative to the quantity of goods procured. If this contract was awarded via a GSA Schedule BPA Call, it implies that pricing was likely benchmarked against existing Schedule contracts. However, a direct comparison with other recent, competitively awarded contracts for similar product bundles would provide a clearer picture of whether Mono Machines LLC's pricing is competitive and offers good value for money to the government.

What are the specific risks associated with a Fixed Price with Economic Price Adjustment (FP-EPA) contract for stationery products?

The primary risk associated with an FP-EPA contract for stationery products is the potential for cost increases due to economic factors, such as inflation in raw material costs (e.g., paper pulp, ink) or transportation. While the fixed price component provides a baseline, the economic price adjustment allows for upward revisions, which can lead to budget uncertainty for the agency if not carefully managed and capped. The government bears the risk of these price escalations, potentially paying more than initially anticipated. Effective oversight involves monitoring the triggers for price adjustments and ensuring they align with legitimate economic shifts rather than contractor inefficiencies.

What is the track record of Mono Machines LLC in fulfilling federal contracts for stationery supplies?

Mono Machines LLC's track record in fulfilling federal contracts for stationery supplies is crucial for assessing performance risk. Information on past performance, including on-time delivery rates, product quality, and customer satisfaction, would be available through sources like the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS). A history of successful contract completions suggests a lower risk of performance issues. Conversely, any documented performance deficiencies could indicate potential challenges in meeting the requirements of this new $12.8 million contract, necessitating closer monitoring by the GSA.

How does the 'full and open competition' method impact the value proposition for taxpayers in this contract?

The 'full and open competition' method is designed to maximize value for taxpayers by ensuring a broad range of potential suppliers can compete for the contract. This competitive pressure typically drives down prices and encourages innovation as companies strive to offer the most attractive bid. For taxpayers, this means a higher likelihood that the government is obtaining stationery products at the most cost-effective rates available in the market. It also promotes transparency and fairness in the procurement process, reducing the risk of cronyism or preferential treatment that could lead to inflated costs.

What is the typical annual spending for stationery products across the federal government, and how does this contract compare?

Determining the typical annual spending for stationery products across the entire federal government requires aggregating data from various agencies and contract vehicles. This $12.8 million contract, averaging about $2.13 million per year, represents a significant, but likely not dominant, portion of the total federal expenditure on such items. Understanding the broader federal spending context helps in assessing whether this contract's value and terms are in line with government-wide trends and procurement strategies for common office supplies. It also aids in identifying potential opportunities for consolidation or strategic sourcing.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Manufacturing › Converted Paper Product Manufacturing › Stationery Product Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: OFFICE SUPPLIES AND DEVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE WITH ECONOMIC PRICE ADJUSTMENT (K)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 2455 DILLON RD, WHITEFISH, MT, 59937

Business Categories: Category Business, Hispanic American Owned Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $12,801

Exercised Options: $12,801

Current Obligation: $12,801

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QSSC26A0003

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline