GSA awards $843K for 40 Ford 4x4 SUVs, with delivery orders expected within 210 days

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $84,324 ($84.3K)

Contractor: Ford Motor CO

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2026-04-09

End Date: 2026-11-05

Contract Duration: 210 days

Daily Burn Rate: $402/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 10

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: 4X4 SUV, INTERMEDIATE, 4 DR, 5 PASS, FOR UPFITTING

Place of Performance

Location: DEARBORN, WAYNE County, MICHIGAN, 48126

State: Michigan Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $84,324 to FORD MOTOR CO for work described as: 4X4 SUV, INTERMEDIATE, 4 DR, 5 PASS, FOR UPFITTING Key points: 1. Value for money appears reasonable given the fixed-price nature and standard vehicle specifications. 2. Competition dynamics indicate a full and open process, suggesting potential for competitive pricing. 3. Risk indicators are low, with a firm fixed-price contract and standard vehicle type. 4. Performance context shows a short duration, implying a focus on immediate fleet needs. 5. Sector positioning is within the automotive supply chain for government fleet vehicles.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract price of approximately $21,081 per vehicle is competitive for a 4x4 SUV with upfitting. Benchmarking against commercial sales of similar Ford models suggests this price falls within a reasonable range, especially considering government fleet purchasing power and the inclusion of specific upfitting requirements. The firm fixed-price structure provides cost certainty for the government.

Cost Per Unit: Approximately $21,081 per vehicle (including upfitting).

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit offers. The presence of 10 bids suggests a healthy level of interest and competition for this requirement. This broad competition is generally favorable for price discovery and ensuring the government receives competitive pricing.

Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition likely resulted in a more favorable price for taxpayers compared to a limited or sole-source award.

Public Impact

Federal agencies requiring reliable transportation for personnel and equipment will benefit from these vehicles. The services delivered include the provision of 40 new 4x4 SUVs, ready for operational use. The geographic impact is primarily within the continental United States, wherever federal agencies require these vehicles. Workforce implications are minimal, primarily related to the delivery and potential initial operation of the vehicles.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for delays in delivery if supply chain issues affect Ford Motor Company.
Upfitting quality needs to be monitored to ensure it meets agency requirements.
Long-term maintenance costs are not directly addressed in this award but are a consideration for fleet management.

Positive Signals

Firm fixed-price contract limits cost overrun risk for the government.
Award to a major manufacturer like Ford Motor Company suggests reliability and established support.
Full and open competition indicates a robust procurement process.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the automotive manufacturing and supply sector, specifically serving the government's need for fleet vehicles. The market for government vehicle procurement is substantial, with agencies like GSA playing a key role in consolidating purchasing power. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other GSA vehicle awards and agency-specific fleet purchases, which often leverage bulk discounts.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small business participation was not a specific set-aside for this contract, nor is there an explicit mention of subcontracting goals. As a large vehicle manufacturer, Ford Motor Company likely has established supply chains that may include small businesses, but this contract's direct impact on the small business ecosystem is not detailed.

Oversight & Accountability

The General Services Administration (GSA) utilizes established procurement regulations and oversight mechanisms to ensure fair and transparent contract awards. This contract, being a delivery order under a larger contract vehicle, benefits from the initial vetting and competition. Transparency is maintained through public contract databases. Inspector General oversight would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

GSA Fleet Vehicle Purchasing
Department of Defense Vehicle Procurement
Law Enforcement Vehicle Acquisition
Federal Agency Fleet Management Programs

Risk Flags

Potential for delivery delays
Upfitting quality assurance
Long-term maintenance considerations

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $84,324 to FORD MOTOR CO. 4X4 SUV, INTERMEDIATE, 4 DR, 5 PASS, FOR UPFITTING

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is FORD MOTOR CO.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $84,324.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-09. End: 2026-11-05.

What is the track record of Ford Motor Company in supplying vehicles to the federal government?

Ford Motor Company has a long-standing and significant track record of supplying vehicles to the federal government. They are a primary provider through various contract vehicles, including those managed by the General Services Administration (GSA). Ford vehicles are commonly used across numerous federal agencies for diverse operational needs, ranging from general transportation to specialized law enforcement and utility purposes. Their consistent presence in government procurement indicates a familiarity with federal acquisition requirements, including specifications, delivery timelines, and reporting obligations. The company's ability to meet these demands over many years suggests a robust production capacity and a dedicated government sales division.

How does the per-unit cost of these SUVs compare to similar commercial purchases?

The per-unit cost of approximately $21,081 for these 4x4 SUVs, including upfitting, appears competitive when compared to similar commercial purchases. While exact commercial pricing varies based on trim level, options, and dealer incentives, this price point is generally in line with or slightly below the retail price for a similarly equipped Ford 4x4 SUV. Government fleet purchasing often leverages bulk discounts and negotiated pricing that can result in savings compared to individual consumer purchases. The firm fixed-price nature of the contract further solidifies this value by locking in the cost.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract award?

The primary risks associated with this contract award are relatively low due to the nature of the product and the contract type. Potential risks include delivery delays stemming from supply chain disruptions affecting Ford Motor Company's production or transportation logistics. Another risk involves the quality and suitability of the specified upfitting; if not performed to standard, it could lead to operational issues for the end-user agencies. While the firm fixed-price contract mitigates cost overrun risks for the government, any unforeseen issues with the vehicles post-delivery, such as defects or premature failures, would fall under warranty provisions, but could still impact agency operations.

How effective is the GSA in managing vehicle procurement for federal agencies?

The General Services Administration (GSA) is generally considered effective in managing vehicle procurement for federal agencies, primarily through its Federal Acquisition Service (FAS). GSA leverages the government's collective buying power to negotiate favorable pricing and terms, often resulting in cost savings for agencies compared to individual procurement. Their established contract vehicles and processes streamline the acquisition process, ensuring compliance with federal regulations. GSA also provides fleet management resources and data analytics to help agencies optimize their vehicle usage and costs. However, like any large-scale operation, challenges can arise, such as adapting to rapidly changing vehicle technologies (e.g., electric vehicles) or navigating complex supply chain issues, which GSA continuously works to address.

What is the historical spending pattern for similar vehicle procurements by the GSA?

Historical spending patterns for similar vehicle procurements by the GSA show a consistent and substantial investment in fleet vehicles. GSA procures thousands of vehicles annually across various categories, including sedans, SUVs, trucks, and specialized vehicles, to meet agency needs. Spending fluctuates based on agency requirements, vehicle replacement cycles, and budget appropriations. The average cost per vehicle can vary significantly depending on the type, specifications, and competition level. Over the years, GSA has focused on optimizing costs through competitive bidding, promoting fuel efficiency, and exploring alternative fuel vehicles, reflecting evolving government priorities and technological advancements in the automotive sector.

Are there any specific performance metrics tied to this delivery order?

While the provided data does not explicitly detail specific performance metrics beyond the delivery timeline (210 days) and the firm fixed-price nature, standard performance expectations for such a contract would include timely delivery of vehicles that precisely match the specified make, model, configuration, and upfitting requirements. The quality of the vehicles and the upfitting must meet industry standards and the contract's technical specifications. Failure to meet these implicit performance standards could lead to contract remedies, such as rejection of non-conforming goods or potential penalties, although the primary recourse for defects would likely be through manufacturer warranties. GSA's oversight ensures that the contractor fulfills these basic performance obligations.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Manufacturing › Motor Vehicle Manufacturing › Automobile Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: MOTOR VEHICLES, CYCLES, TRAILERS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 47QMCA21R0008

Offers Received: 10

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Ford Motor Company

Address: 1 AMERICAN RD, DEARBORN, MI, 48126

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $84,324

Exercised Options: $84,324

Current Obligation: $84,324

Contract Characteristics

Multi-Year Contract: Yes

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QMCA22D000P

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline