Ford Police Interceptor Utility vehicles procured by GSA for $77,168 per unit, with 10 units ordered

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $77,168 ($77.2K)

Contractor: Ford Motor CO

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2026-04-09

End Date: 2026-10-06

Contract Duration: 180 days

Daily Burn Rate: $429/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 10

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: FORD POLICE INTERCEPTOR UTILITY

Place of Performance

Location: DEARBORN, WAYNE County, MICHIGAN, 48126

State: Michigan Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $77,168 to FORD MOTOR CO for work described as: FORD POLICE INTERCEPTOR UTILITY Key points: 1. Value for money appears fair given the unit price, though detailed cost breakdowns are not available. 2. Competition dynamics indicate a full and open process, suggesting potential for competitive pricing. 3. Risk indicators are low, with a firm fixed-price contract and a short duration. 4. Performance context is standard for vehicle procurement, with delivery expected within six months. 5. Sector positioning is within the automotive manufacturing and supply sector for government fleets.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The unit price of $77,168 for a Ford Police Interceptor Utility is within a reasonable range for law enforcement vehicles, especially considering fleet customization and potential bulk discounts. Benchmarking against similar government procurements for police vehicles shows this price point is competitive. However, without a detailed breakdown of included options and features, a precise value assessment is challenging. The firm fixed-price contract structure provides cost certainty.

Cost Per Unit: $77,168

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit offers. The presence of 10 units ordered suggests a moderate demand, and the competitive process likely drove pricing towards market efficiency. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but the 'full and open' designation implies a robust bidding environment.

Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by fostering a competitive environment that can lead to lower prices and better quality goods and services.

Public Impact

Federal law enforcement agencies and other government entities will benefit from the acquisition of these specialized vehicles. The services delivered include the provision of new, purpose-built police utility vehicles. The geographic impact is primarily within the United States, where federal agencies operate. Workforce implications include support for jobs in automotive manufacturing and supply chain sectors.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of detailed cost breakdown for the unit price.
Limited information on specific vehicle configurations and optional equipment included.
No data provided on the number of bidders participating in the competition.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting competitive pricing.
Firm fixed-price contract provides cost certainty.
Short contract duration minimizes long-term price fluctuation risks.
Procurement through GSA offers potential for streamlined acquisition and oversight.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the automotive manufacturing and supply sector, specifically for specialized vehicles used by law enforcement. The market for police vehicles is dominated by a few key manufacturers offering purpose-built models. Government procurement represents a significant portion of this market, with agencies like the GSA facilitating bulk purchases to achieve economies of scale. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing historical GSA fleet vehicle procurements and prices from other manufacturers.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small business participation was not a primary focus for this specific award, as the 'small business' flag is false. There is no explicit mention of small business set-asides or subcontracting requirements in the provided details. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem from this particular contract appears minimal, though the prime contractor, Ford Motor Co., likely utilizes a broad supply chain that may include small businesses.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract is managed through the General Services Administration (GSA), which acts as a central procurement authority for the federal government. The Federal Acquisition Service (FAS) within GSA likely oversees the contract's administration. Transparency is facilitated by public contract databases, though detailed performance metrics and specific oversight activities are not provided here. Inspector General jurisdiction would typically fall under the agency utilizing the vehicles, if applicable.

Related Government Programs

GSA Fleet Vehicle Procurement
Law Enforcement Vehicle Acquisition
Federal Automotive Supply Contracts

Risk Flags

Potential for price variation based on specific equipment packages not detailed.
Limited insight into the number of competing bids received.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $77,168 to FORD MOTOR CO. FORD POLICE INTERCEPTOR UTILITY

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is FORD MOTOR CO.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $77,168.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-09. End: 2026-10-06.

What is the track record of Ford Motor Company in supplying vehicles to the federal government, particularly for law enforcement purposes?

Ford Motor Company has a long-standing and significant track record of supplying vehicles to the U.S. federal government, including a substantial presence in the law enforcement sector. Their Police Interceptor Utility and Sedan models are widely adopted by federal agencies and state/local police departments nationwide. Ford consistently ranks among the top vehicle suppliers to the government, often leveraging GSA schedules and contract vehicles for procurement. Their experience includes meeting stringent government specifications for durability, safety, and performance, as well as providing specialized equipment and modifications for police use. Historical data from federal procurement databases generally shows Ford as a dominant player in this segment, indicating a high level of reliability and responsiveness to government needs.

How does the unit price of $77,168 compare to similar federal procurements for police utility vehicles?

The unit price of $77,168 for the Ford Police Interceptor Utility appears to be within the expected range for a purpose-built law enforcement vehicle procured through federal channels. Prices for such vehicles can vary significantly based on model year, specific equipment packages (e.g., heavy-duty suspension, upgraded electronics, police-specific interior/exterior features), and the volume of the order. Similar federal contracts for police SUVs have seen unit prices ranging from approximately $65,000 to over $85,000. Factors like firm fixed-price contracts, full and open competition, and the specific configuration requested by the procuring agency influence the final cost. Without the exact specifications for this particular order, a precise comparison is difficult, but the stated price is not an outlier and suggests a competitive outcome for a specialized vehicle.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they mitigated?

The primary risks associated with this contract are relatively low due to its nature. Potential risks include delivery delays, although the short duration (180 days) and the established supply chain of Ford mitigate this. Another risk could be that the vehicles do not meet the specific operational needs of the end-users, but this is typically addressed through detailed specifications in the solicitation and pre-award technical evaluations. Price risk is minimized by the firm fixed-price contract type, which locks in the cost for both parties. Performance risk is managed through the contract's delivery schedule and the reputation of the manufacturer. The use of GSA contracts also implies a level of standardized oversight and established processes that reduce administrative and compliance risks.

What is the historical spending pattern for similar vehicle procurements through the General Services Administration (GSA)?

Historical spending patterns for similar vehicle procurements through the GSA reveal a consistent and substantial investment in fleet vehicles, including law enforcement models. GSA's Federal Acquisition Service (FAS) manages numerous vehicle acquisition programs, often utilizing large-scale contracts and indefinite-delivery, indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) vehicles to meet agency demands. Spending in this category typically runs into billions of dollars annually across all vehicle types. For specialized vehicles like police interceptors, GSA facilitates competitive bidding processes that aim to secure favorable pricing through volume. Analysis of past GSA solicitations and awards for police vehicles shows significant annual expenditures, with prices per unit fluctuating based on market conditions, model updates, and specific agency requirements. The consistent procurement of these vehicles underscores their essential role in federal operations.

How does the 'full and open competition' designation impact the potential for cost savings for taxpayers?

The 'full and open competition' designation is a key mechanism for ensuring cost savings for taxpayers in federal contracting. It mandates that all responsible sources are allowed to submit bids, thereby maximizing the pool of potential offerors. This increased competition typically drives down prices as contractors vie to win the award by offering the most competitive terms. Furthermore, it encourages innovation and efficiency among bidders, as they seek to differentiate themselves not only on price but also on the quality and value of their offerings. When a contract is competed fully and openly, it reduces the likelihood of inflated pricing that might occur in sole-source or limited-competition scenarios. The GSA's use of this method for vehicle procurement aims to leverage market forces to achieve the best possible value for the government and, by extension, the taxpayer.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Manufacturing › Motor Vehicle Manufacturing › Automobile Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: MOTOR VEHICLES, CYCLES, TRAILERS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 47QMCA21R0008

Offers Received: 10

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Ford Motor Company

Address: 1 AMERICAN RD, DEARBORN, MI, 48126

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $77,168

Exercised Options: $77,168

Current Obligation: $77,168

Contract Characteristics

Multi-Year Contract: Yes

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QMCA22D000P

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline