DoD Awards $26M for Emergency Power & Hazmat Building to Bristol Design Build Services

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $26,041,369 ($26.0M)

Contractor: Bristol Design Build Services, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2010-06-16

End Date: 2012-09-30

Contract Duration: 837 days

Daily Burn Rate: $31.1K/day

Competition Type: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: EMERGENCY POWER AND HAZ MATERIALS BLDG

Place of Performance

Location: NEW ORLEANS, JEFFERSON County, LOUISIANA, 70121

State: Louisiana Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $26.0 million to BRISTOL DESIGN BUILD SERVICES, LLC for work described as: EMERGENCY POWER AND HAZ MATERIALS BLDG Key points: 1. Contract awarded for industrial building construction, specifically for emergency power and hazardous materials. 2. The award went to Bristol Design Build Services, LLC. 3. The contract was not available for competition, raising potential concerns about price discovery. 4. The sector is Industrial Building Construction, with a significant dollar value. 5. The contract duration was 837 days.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $26,041,369 is substantial for industrial building construction. Without specific benchmarks for emergency power and hazmat facilities, it's difficult to definitively assess pricing. However, the lack of competition suggests potential for overpricing.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The contract was 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION,' indicating a limited competition approach. This significantly restricts the opportunity for competitive bidding and robust price discovery, potentially leading to higher costs for taxpayers.

Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition limits the government's ability to secure the best possible price, potentially resulting in a higher taxpayer burden for this facility.

Public Impact

Taxpayers may have paid more than necessary due to the absence of competitive bidding. The construction of critical infrastructure like emergency power and hazmat facilities is vital for military readiness. The long duration of the contract (837 days) suggests a complex project with significant resource allocation.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of competition
Potential for inflated pricing
Long contract duration

Positive Signals

Awarded to a specific company for critical infrastructure

Sector Analysis

The Industrial Building Construction sector involves the erection of facilities for manufacturing, processing, and storage. Spending in this sector can vary widely based on defense needs and infrastructure upgrades. This contract represents a significant investment within this category.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small business participation was not a factor in this award, as the 'sb' field is false. Further analysis would be needed to determine if opportunities were missed for small businesses in this construction project.

Oversight & Accountability

The 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION' status warrants scrutiny. Oversight should focus on the justification for this procurement method and ensure that the pricing reflects fair market value despite the limited competition.

Related Government Programs

Industrial Building Construction
Department of Defense Contracting
Department of the Army Programs

Risk Flags

Lack of competition
Potential for overpricing
Limited transparency in price discovery
No small business participation noted

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $26.0 million to BRISTOL DESIGN BUILD SERVICES, LLC. EMERGENCY POWER AND HAZ MATERIALS BLDG

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is BRISTOL DESIGN BUILD SERVICES, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $26.0 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2010-06-16. End: 2012-09-30.

What was the specific justification for limiting competition on this $26 million construction contract?

The justification for limiting competition is crucial for understanding the value proposition. Without a competitive process, it's difficult to ascertain if the government received the best possible price and quality. Further investigation into the contract file and any sole-source justifications would be necessary to determine the rationale behind this decision and its impact on overall value.

What are the potential risks associated with awarding a large construction contract without competition?

The primary risk of awarding a large contract without competition is the potential for inflated pricing, as the contractor faces less pressure to offer competitive rates. Other risks include reduced innovation, potential quality compromises if the contractor is not incentivized by market forces, and a lack of transparency in the procurement process. This can lead to inefficient use of taxpayer funds.

How effective is the Department of the Army in managing construction projects awarded under limited competition?

Assessing the effectiveness of the Department of the Army in managing construction projects awarded under limited competition requires analyzing project outcomes, cost overruns, schedule adherence, and quality of work compared to similar projects procured competitively. Without specific performance data for this contract, it's challenging to make a definitive judgment. However, the inherent risks of limited competition suggest a need for robust internal oversight and performance monitoring.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Industrial Building Construction

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Solicitation ID: W912HN10R0031

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 111 W 16TH AVE STE 303, ANCHORAGE, AK, 99501

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Alaskan Native Corporation Owned Firm, Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $26,041,369

Exercised Options: $26,041,369

Current Obligation: $26,041,369

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline