Department of the Navy awards $1.99M contract for building repair to Bristol Design Build Services, LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $19,881,488 ($19.9M)

Contractor: Bristol Design Build Services, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2019-10-24

End Date: 2023-12-14

Contract Duration: 1,512 days

Daily Burn Rate: $13.1K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: X003 WON:1397030 -- REPAIR Q4 SPECWAR UH - BLDG 618, NAB CORONADO

Place of Performance

Location: SAN DIEGO, SAN DIEGO County, CALIFORNIA, 92135

State: California Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $19.9 million to BRISTOL DESIGN BUILD SERVICES, LLC for work described as: X003 WON:1397030 -- REPAIR Q4 SPECWAR UH - BLDG 618, NAB CORONADO Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable for specialized building repair services. 2. Full and open competition was utilized, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. The contract duration of over 4 years indicates a significant, long-term need. 4. Fixed-price contract type shifts performance risk to the contractor. 5. The contractor, Bristol Design Build Services, LLC, has a track record with federal contracts. 6. Geographic focus on California may indicate regional specialization or demand.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of approximately $1.99 million for building repair services seems within a reasonable range for a project of this scope and duration. Benchmarking against similar commercial and institutional building construction contracts awarded by the Department of the Navy or other federal agencies would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The firm fixed-price nature of the contract is generally favorable for the government as it caps the total cost.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources,' which implies that while sources were initially excluded, the opportunity was ultimately opened to all responsible sources. This suggests a robust competition was intended. The number of bidders is not specified, but the designation indicates a commitment to broad market engagement.

Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition generally leads to better price discovery and potentially lower costs for taxpayers by leveraging the widest possible range of qualified contractors.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the Department of the Navy, receiving essential facility maintenance and repair services. The contract delivers critical repairs and maintenance for Building 618 at NAB Coronado, ensuring operational readiness. The geographic impact is localized to Coronado, California, supporting naval operations in the region. Workforce implications include employment opportunities for construction and skilled trades within the local California economy.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep if repair needs exceed initial estimates.
Dependence on contractor's ability to meet quality and timeline requirements.
Risk of unforeseen site conditions impacting project cost or schedule.

Positive Signals

Firm fixed-price contract mitigates cost overrun risk for the government.
Long contract duration allows for sustained facility support.
Full and open competition suggests a competitive environment that can drive quality and efficiency.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector, a vital part of the broader construction industry. Federal spending in this area supports the maintenance and modernization of government facilities. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing the average cost of similar repair and renovation projects for military installations, considering factors like size, complexity, and location.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not specifically set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, the primary impact on small businesses would be through potential subcontracting opportunities if Bristol Design Build Services, LLC chooses to engage them. Without specific subcontracting plans, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem is limited to indirect economic activity.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the Department of the Navy's contracting and facility management departments. Accountability measures are embedded in the firm fixed-price contract terms, requiring the contractor to deliver specified services within the agreed budget. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases, though specific performance details may be internal.

Related Government Programs

Naval Facilities Engineering Command (NAVFAC) Contracts
Department of Defense Facility Maintenance and Repair
Military Construction Projects
Base Realignment and Closure (BRAC) related infrastructure

Risk Flags

Potential for cost increases if unforeseen conditions arise.
Contractor performance risk (quality, timeliness).
Adequacy of initial scope definition for repairs.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $19.9 million to BRISTOL DESIGN BUILD SERVICES, LLC. X003 WON:1397030 -- REPAIR Q4 SPECWAR UH - BLDG 618, NAB CORONADO

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is BRISTOL DESIGN BUILD SERVICES, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $19.9 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2019-10-24. End: 2023-12-14.

What is the track record of Bristol Design Build Services, LLC with federal contracts, particularly with the Department of the Navy?

Bristol Design Build Services, LLC has a history of securing federal contracts, including those with the Department of the Navy. Analysis of their contract awards reveals a pattern of work in construction and facility maintenance. While specific performance metrics for past contracts are not detailed in this summary, the award of this $1.99 million contract suggests a level of trust and demonstrated capability by the agency. Further investigation into past performance evaluations and any reported issues would provide a more comprehensive understanding of their reliability and quality of work.

How does the awarded price of $1.99 million compare to similar building repair contracts for naval facilities?

The awarded price of approximately $1.99 million for the repair of Building 618 at NAB Coronado needs to be benchmarked against similar projects to assess value for money. Factors such as the scope of repairs, square footage of the building, age and condition of the facility, and the specific types of systems being repaired (e.g., HVAC, electrical, structural) are crucial for comparison. Without detailed project specifications and cost breakdowns, a precise comparison is difficult. However, for a multi-year repair and renovation project on a military installation, this figure appears to be within a plausible range, assuming the scope is substantial.

What are the primary risks associated with this firm fixed-price contract for building repair?

The primary risks for the government under a firm fixed-price (FFP) contract are generally lower compared to cost-reimbursement types, as the price is set. However, risks can still exist. These include the contractor potentially cutting corners on quality to maintain profitability if unforeseen issues arise, or the risk of contractor default if they become financially unstable. For the contractor, the risk lies in underestimating the scope or complexity of the repairs, leading to potential losses if costs exceed the fixed price. Unforeseen site conditions or changes in regulatory requirements could also pose risks.

How effective is the 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' method in ensuring competitive pricing for construction services?

The 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' method aims to balance the need for specialized services with ensuring broad competition. Initially, certain sources might be excluded based on specific criteria (e.g., past performance, technical capabilities). However, the subsequent opening to all responsible sources ensures that the market is broadly canvassed. This approach can be effective if the initial exclusion criteria are justified and do not unduly limit competition. The ultimate effectiveness in ensuring competitive pricing depends on the number of responsive bids received and the agency's negotiation strategy. If few bids are received after the exclusion, the competitive pressure might be reduced.

What is the historical spending pattern for building repair and maintenance at NAB Coronado or similar naval installations?

Historical spending patterns for building repair and maintenance at NAB Coronado and similar naval installations typically show consistent, albeit fluctuating, investment. These patterns are influenced by factors such as the age of infrastructure, operational tempo, and specific modernization initiatives. Agencies like the Department of the Navy allocate significant budgets annually for facilities sustainment, repair, and minor construction. Analyzing past awards for similar services at this installation or within the region would reveal trends in contract values, types of services procured, and the contractors most frequently engaged, providing context for the current $1.99 million award.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, ALTER REAL PROPERTY › MAINT, ALTER, REPAIR NONBUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: N6247315R2440

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 111 WEST 16TH AVE 3RD FLOOR, ANCHORAGE, AK, 99501

Business Categories: Alaskan Native Corporation Owned Firm, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $19,881,488

Exercised Options: $19,881,488

Current Obligation: $19,881,488

Subaward Activity

Number of Subawards: 36

Total Subaward Amount: $18,017,378

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: N6247317D4636

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline