DOD awards $26.3M for Alaska Health Clinic to Bristol Design Build Services, LLC
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $26,316,903 ($26.3M)
Contractor: Bristol Design Build Services, LLC
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2007-05-11
End Date: 2009-01-21
Contract Duration: 621 days
Daily Burn Rate: $42.4K/day
Competition Type: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Construction
Official Description: CONSTRUCT HEALTH CLINIC
Place of Performance
Location: ELMENDORF AFB, ANCHORAGE County, ALASKA, 99506
State: Alaska Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $26.3 million to BRISTOL DESIGN BUILD SERVICES, LLC for work described as: CONSTRUCT HEALTH CLINIC Key points: 1. The contract value of $26.3 million is significant for a single health clinic construction project. 2. Competition was not available, raising questions about price discovery and potential overpayment. 3. The project falls under the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector. 4. The duration of 621 days suggests a complex or lengthy construction process.
Value Assessment
Rating: questionable
The contract was awarded without competition, making it difficult to assess pricing against similar contracts. The awarded amount of $26.3 million for a health clinic needs further benchmarking against projects of similar scope and location.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: limited
The contract was not available for competition, indicating a sole-source or limited source award. This lack of competition limits the government's ability to ensure the best possible price through market forces.
Taxpayer Impact: Without competitive bidding, taxpayers may have paid a premium for the construction services, as there was no direct pressure to offer the lowest possible price.
Public Impact
Construction of a health clinic impacts military readiness and the well-being of service members and their families. The sole-source nature of the award may set a precedent for future construction contracts in the region. Transparency in the justification for limited competition is crucial for public trust.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of competition
- High contract value for a single facility
- Long contract duration
Positive Signals
- Project addresses a critical need for health infrastructure
Sector Analysis
This project falls within the Commercial and Institutional Building Construction sector. Spending benchmarks for similar military health clinic constructions are needed to properly evaluate the $26.3 million award.
Small Business Impact
There is no indication that small businesses were involved in this contract, either as prime contractors or subcontractors. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small business participation was sought or required.
Oversight & Accountability
The Department of Defense, specifically the Department of the Army, is responsible for overseeing this contract. The justification for the limited competition and the subsequent execution of the contract should be subject to standard oversight procedures.
Related Government Programs
- Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Lack of competitive bidding
- Potential for inflated costs due to sole-source award
- Limited transparency on justification for non-competition
- Long project duration may indicate execution challenges or scope creep
Tags
commercial-and-institutional-building-co, department-of-defense, ak, dca, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $26.3 million to BRISTOL DESIGN BUILD SERVICES, LLC. CONSTRUCT HEALTH CLINIC
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is BRISTOL DESIGN BUILD SERVICES, LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $26.3 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2007-05-11. End: 2009-01-21.
What was the specific justification for awarding this contract on a limited/sole-source basis, and were alternative competitive strategies considered?
The provided data states 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION,' which implies a sole-source or limited-source justification was used. A thorough review would require access to the contract file to understand the specific reasons, such as unique capabilities of the contractor or urgent requirements, and to confirm if other competitive approaches were explored and deemed unsuitable.
How does the $26.3 million cost compare to industry benchmarks for constructing similar-sized health clinics in Alaska or similar climates?
Without specific details on the clinic's size, scope, and amenities, a direct comparison is challenging. However, $26.3 million is a substantial sum for a single health clinic. Benchmarking against recent Department of Defense or other federal agency construction projects for comparable facilities in similar geographic and climatic conditions would be necessary to assess cost-effectiveness.
What mechanisms were in place to ensure cost control and quality assurance given the lack of competitive pressure?
With a firm-fixed-price contract awarded non-competitively, the government relied on the contractor's proposed pricing and the contract's terms for cost control. Quality assurance would typically be managed through government-appointed contract officers' representatives (CORs) and inspection protocols to ensure the clinic meets all specifications and standards.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Construction › Nonresidential Building Construction › Commercial and Institutional Building Construction
Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Solicitation ID: W911KB07R0001
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 111 W 16TH AVE STE 303, ANCHORAGE, AK, 00
Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Category Business, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Small Disadvantaged Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $26,316,903
Exercised Options: $26,316,903
Current Obligation: $26,316,903
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2007-05-11
Current End Date: 2009-01-21
Potential End Date: 2009-01-21 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2011-11-21
More Contracts from Bristol Design Build Services, LLC
- Construction of the CDC Building — $47.2M (Department of Defense)
- Emergency Power and HAZ Materials Bldg — $26.0M (Department of Defense)
- D-B, Install Ptac Units on Living Quarters B1005, B1004, B1006, B11332, Fort Bliss, TX — $26.0M (Department of Defense)
- Boiler Plant Equipment — $25.5M (Department of Defense)
- X003 WON:1397030 -- Repair Q4 Specwar UH - Bldg 618, NAB Coronado — $19.9M (Department of Defense)
View all Bristol Design Build Services, LLC federal contracts →
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)