DoD awards $30.5M for EV charging infrastructure, with TechFlow Inc. selected via full and open competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $30,550,717 ($30.6M)
Contractor: Techflow, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2022-09-30
End Date: 2024-08-30
Contract Duration: 700 days
Daily Burn Rate: $43.6K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Number of Offers Received: 12
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL MANAGEMENT, LABOR, EQUIPMENT AND MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR THE PROCUREMENT AND INSTALLATION DELIVERY OF ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING FACILITIES (EVCF).
Place of Performance
Location: FORT BRAGG, CUMBERLAND County, NORTH CAROLINA, 28310
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $30.6 million to TECHFLOW, INC. for work described as: THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL MANAGEMENT, LABOR, EQUIPMENT AND MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR THE PROCUREMENT AND INSTALLATION DELIVERY OF ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING FACILITIES (EVCF). Key points: 1. Contract focuses on establishing electric vehicle charging facilities, aligning with broader federal sustainability goals. 2. The award was made under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive market for these services. 3. A fixed-price contract type indicates that the contractor bears the risk of cost overruns. 4. The contract duration of 700 days suggests a significant implementation phase for the charging infrastructure. 5. The North Carolina location for the contractor may indicate a regional focus for this initial deployment.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $30.5 million for electric vehicle charging facilities appears reasonable given the scope of providing management, labor, equipment, and materials for installation. Benchmarking against similar large-scale infrastructure projects is challenging without more specific details on the number and type of charging stations. However, the firm fixed-price nature of the contract shifts cost risk to the contractor, which can be a positive indicator for value if managed effectively. The award amount is within the expected range for substantial infrastructure development.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded using 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources,' which implies that the solicitation was broadly advertised and all responsible sources were permitted to submit offers. The presence of 12 bids indicates a healthy level of competition for this requirement. A competitive environment like this generally leads to better price discovery and potentially more favorable terms for the government.
Taxpayer Impact: The robust competition suggests that taxpayer dollars are likely being used efficiently, as multiple companies vied to provide the best value, driving down costs and improving service offerings.
Public Impact
The Department of Defense will benefit from enhanced electric vehicle charging capabilities, supporting its fleet's transition to cleaner energy. Services delivered include the procurement and installation of electric vehicle charging facilities. The geographic impact is currently focused on North Carolina, where the contractor is based, but could expand as the DoD's EV infrastructure grows. This contract supports jobs in manufacturing, logistics, and construction related to the installation of charging stations.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for cost overruns if unforeseen site preparation challenges arise, despite the fixed-price nature.
- Dependence on TechFlow, Inc. for successful delivery within the specified timeline.
- Scalability challenges if the initial deployment in North Carolina needs rapid expansion to other locations.
Positive Signals
- Clear definition of deliverables and scope of work for EV charging facility installation.
- Firm fixed-price contract structure provides cost certainty for the government.
- Demonstrated competition with 12 bidders suggests a robust market response.
Sector Analysis
The electric vehicle charging infrastructure market is rapidly expanding, driven by government mandates and private sector investment in sustainability. This contract fits within the broader 'Other Miscellaneous Electrical Equipment and Component Manufacturing' sector, but specifically addresses the growing demand for EV charging solutions. Comparable spending benchmarks are emerging as more federal agencies invest in electrifying their fleets and facilities. The total contract value of $30.5 million positions this as a significant project within the federal EV infrastructure landscape.
Small Business Impact
The contract was awarded under full and open competition and does not indicate any specific small business set-aside provisions. While TechFlow, Inc. is the prime contractor, there is potential for small businesses to be involved as subcontractors, particularly in areas like local labor, materials supply, or specialized installation services. The extent of small business participation will depend on TechFlow's subcontracting strategy and the specific requirements of the project.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the Department of the Army contracting officers and program managers responsible for facilities and energy initiatives. Accountability measures are embedded in the firm fixed-price contract terms, requiring TechFlow, Inc. to deliver the specified EV charging facilities. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases and reporting requirements, though specific oversight reports or Inspector General involvement would depend on performance issues or audits.
Related Government Programs
- Federal Fleet Management
- Sustainable Facilities Initiatives
- Department of Defense Energy Programs
- Electric Vehicle Infrastructure Development
Risk Flags
- Potential for supply chain delays impacting equipment delivery.
- Site-specific installation challenges may increase costs or timelines.
- Integration with existing power grids requires careful technical management.
- Ensuring compliance with evolving electrical codes and DoD standards.
Tags
defense, department-of-defense, department-of-the-army, electric-vehicle-charging, infrastructure, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, techflow-inc, north-carolina, sustainability, energy-facilities, definitive-contract
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $30.6 million to TECHFLOW, INC.. THE CONTRACTOR SHALL PROVIDE ALL MANAGEMENT, LABOR, EQUIPMENT AND MATERIAL NECESSARY FOR THE PROCUREMENT AND INSTALLATION DELIVERY OF ELECTRIC VEHICLE CHARGING FACILITIES (EVCF).
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is TECHFLOW, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $30.6 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2022-09-30. End: 2024-08-30.
What is TechFlow, Inc.'s track record with large-scale federal infrastructure projects, particularly those involving electrical systems or energy facilities?
Information on TechFlow, Inc.'s specific track record with large-scale federal infrastructure projects, especially those involving electrical systems or energy facilities, is not detailed in the provided data. A comprehensive review would require examining past performance evaluations, contract history with agencies like the Department of Defense, and any reported successes or challenges in similar installations. Without this context, it's difficult to fully assess their capability to execute this $30.5 million EV charging facility contract effectively. Further due diligence would involve looking into their project portfolio, client references, and any history of performance issues or commendations on federal contracts.
How does the $30.5 million contract value compare to the average cost of similar electric vehicle charging facility installations for the federal government?
Benchmarking the $30.5 million contract value against average costs for similar federal EV charging facility installations is challenging without more granular data on the scope of work, such as the number and type of charging stations, power capacity, and site preparation complexity. However, the contract covers 'all management, labor, equipment and material necessary for the procurement and installation delivery,' suggesting a comprehensive project. The firm fixed-price nature implies that TechFlow, Inc. has factored in these costs and risks. To provide a precise comparison, one would need data on the cost per charging port or per kilowatt of charging capacity for comparable DoD or other federal agency projects, considering regional labor and material cost variations.
What are the primary risk indicators associated with this contract, considering its scope and the firm fixed-price nature?
The primary risk indicators for this contract, despite its firm fixed-price nature, include potential delays in procurement or installation due to supply chain disruptions for specialized EV charging equipment. Site-specific challenges, such as unforeseen underground utilities or environmental remediation needs, could also increase costs or timelines for the contractor, potentially leading to disputes or performance issues. Furthermore, the successful integration of the charging facilities with existing power infrastructure presents a technical risk. The contractor's ability to manage labor and subcontractors effectively across the 700-day duration is also a key risk factor. Finally, ensuring compliance with evolving electrical codes and DoD-specific standards adds another layer of complexity.
How effective is the 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources' method likely to be in ensuring program effectiveness for EV charging facilities?
The 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources' method is generally effective in promoting program effectiveness for EV charging facilities because it allows a wide range of qualified vendors to compete. This broad competition encourages contractors to propose innovative solutions and efficient installation methods to win the contract. The requirement for 12 bids suggests that multiple capable companies participated, increasing the likelihood that the selected contractor, TechFlow, Inc., offered a technically sound and cost-effective approach. Program effectiveness is further supported by the firm fixed-price contract, which incentivizes the contractor to meet performance standards efficiently to maximize profit, thereby aligning their goals with the government's need for functional and reliable charging infrastructure.
What are the historical spending patterns for electric vehicle infrastructure within the Department of the Army or DoD?
Historical spending patterns for electric vehicle infrastructure within the Department of the Army or the broader DoD show a significant upward trend in recent years, driven by executive orders and strategic goals to electrify federal fleets and reduce carbon emissions. While specific dollar amounts for past EV charging facility procurements are not detailed here, the increasing focus on sustainability and energy resilience indicates a growing investment in this area. This $30.5 million contract represents a substantial commitment, likely part of a larger, multi-year strategy to modernize charging capabilities across military installations. Analyzing past budgets and contract awards related to alternative fuels, fleet modernization, and energy infrastructure would provide a clearer picture of the historical trajectory.
What is the significance of the North Carolina (NC) location for the contractor, TechFlow, Inc., in relation to this DoD contract?
The significance of TechFlow, Inc. being located in North Carolina (NC) for this Department of Defense contract primarily relates to logistical considerations and potential regional economic impact. It suggests that the initial phase of procurement, project management, or even some installation activities may be centered in or coordinated from this state. For the DoD, having a contractor based in a particular region can sometimes streamline communication and oversight, especially if other related facilities or operations are nearby. However, for a national-level contract like EV charging infrastructure, the contractor's location is often less critical than their ability to deploy resources nationwide. The NC base might also imply a focus on installations within the southeastern region initially, or it could simply be the company's headquarters with operations extending beyond the state.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Manufacturing › Other Electrical Equipment and Component Manufacturing › All Other Miscellaneous Electrical Equipment and Component Manufacturing
Product/Service Code: ELECTRIC WIRE, POWER DISTRIB EQPT
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: W912DY22Q0167
Offers Received: 12
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 9889 WILLOW CREEK RD STE 100, SAN DIEGO, CA, 92131
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $30,550,717
Exercised Options: $30,550,717
Current Obligation: $30,550,717
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2022-09-30
Current End Date: 2024-08-30
Potential End Date: 2024-08-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2024-03-25
More Contracts from Techflow, Inc.
- This Contract Supports the Integration Logistics Support (ILS) Branch Through a Performance Based Logistics (PBL) Program to Maintain ALL Explosive Detection Systems (EDS) Deployed and Operated by TSA AT Airports of ALL Sizes and Other Government-Designated Facilities Throughout the United States and ITS Territories. the Requirements Under This Contract Include EDS Maintenance and Logistics Support, Radiation Surveys, Applicable Preventive Maintenance, Communications, Maintenance Planning, Supply Support, Tools, Test Equipment and Calibration, Parts and Parts Obsolescence — $1.0B (Department of Homeland Security)
- Explosive Detection System (EDS) Performance Based Logistics (PBL) — $512.7M (Department of Homeland Security)
- Award of AAS Business Systems — $105.2M (General Services Administration)
- Award Primary Training Ranges Operations, Maintenance&support Service Contract, Fund the Transition Period, and Incrementally Fund the Base Year — $67.4M (Department of Defense)
- This Fpdsng Entry Reflects Base Document Thru Modification PS13. Increasing Funding by $15,095,882.69. for a Total Value of $29,638,917.17. CE — $50.3M (General Services Administration)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)