NASA Awards $27.3M Task Order for Basic Age Support to Kay and Associates, Inc
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $27,269,248 ($27.3M)
Contractor: KAY and Associates, Inc.
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2006-07-01
End Date: 2017-04-30
Contract Duration: 3,956 days
Daily Burn Rate: $6.9K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Official Description: TASK ORDER FOR BASIC AGE SUPPORT (CLIN'S 1A AND 3A)
Place of Performance
Location: EDWARDS, KERN County, CALIFORNIA, 93523
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $27.3 million to KAY AND ASSOCIATES, INC. for work described as: TASK ORDER FOR BASIC AGE SUPPORT (CLIN'S 1A AND 3A) Key points: 1. The contract value of $27.3M for basic age support represents a significant investment in aircraft parts and auxiliary equipment. 2. Kay and Associates, Inc. secured this award through full and open competition after exclusion of sources, indicating a competitive process. 3. The duration of the task order (3956 days) suggests a long-term need for these services, potentially impacting sustained spending. 4. The sector is 'Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing,' a niche but critical area for aerospace operations.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The award amount of $27.3M for a 3956-day duration needs further benchmarking against similar long-term support contracts for aircraft parts. Without specific per-unit cost data, a precise value assessment is challenging.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES.' This suggests that while competition was sought, specific sources may have been excluded, potentially limiting the breadth of price discovery.
Taxpayer Impact: The $27.3M expenditure represents taxpayer funds allocated to a specific aerospace support requirement. The effectiveness of the competition method in securing optimal pricing will determine the ultimate taxpayer impact.
Public Impact
Supports critical aerospace operations for NASA. Long-term contract may indicate stable demand for specialized parts. Competition method could influence overall cost-effectiveness for taxpayers. Potential for follow-on work or related contracts in the future.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Long contract duration may lead to cost overruns if not managed effectively.
- Exclusion of sources in competition could limit price competitiveness.
- Lack of detailed per-unit cost data hinders precise value assessment.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through a competitive process.
- Supports a key government agency (NASA).
- Long-term nature suggests a consistent need for the services.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the 'Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing' sector, which is vital for maintaining aerospace capabilities. Spending benchmarks in this niche sector are difficult to establish without more granular data on specific part types and support levels.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that this contract was not awarded to a small business (sb: false). Therefore, there is no direct benefit to small businesses from this specific award, and analysis of their participation is not applicable.
Oversight & Accountability
The task order was issued by NASA, a federal agency with established oversight mechanisms. However, the long duration of the contract necessitates ongoing monitoring to ensure performance and cost control, with accountability resting with the contracting officers.
Related Government Programs
- Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracting
- National Aeronautics and Space Administration Programs
Risk Flags
- Long contract duration increases risk of cost escalation.
- Potential for limited competition due to source exclusion.
- Lack of detailed cost breakdowns hinders value analysis.
- Dependence on a single contractor for a long period.
- Sector-specific risks related to supply chain and technological obsolescence.
Tags
other-aircraft-parts-and-auxiliary-equip, national-aeronautics-and-space-administr, ca, delivery-order, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $27.3 million to KAY AND ASSOCIATES, INC.. TASK ORDER FOR BASIC AGE SUPPORT (CLIN'S 1A AND 3A)
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is KAY AND ASSOCIATES, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $27.3 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2006-07-01. End: 2017-04-30.
What is the specific nature of the 'basic age support' being provided, and how does it contribute to NASA's mission objectives?
Basic age support likely refers to the maintenance, repair, or refurbishment of aging aircraft components or systems. This is crucial for ensuring the continued operational readiness and safety of NASA's aviation assets, which are often used for research, development, and specialized missions. The specific contribution would depend on the type of aircraft and its role within NASA's broader scientific and exploratory endeavors.
How did the 'exclusion of sources' in the full and open competition impact the final pricing and overall value for taxpayers?
The exclusion of specific sources, even in a full and open competition, can limit the competitive landscape. If highly capable or cost-competitive vendors were excluded, the remaining bidders might face less pressure to offer the lowest possible price. This could potentially lead to a higher overall cost for taxpayers compared to a scenario with broader participation, necessitating careful review of the justification for exclusion.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) and metrics used to measure the effectiveness of Kay and Associates, Inc. in delivering this basic age support?
Effective oversight would involve defining clear KPIs such as turnaround time for repairs, defect rates, adherence to technical specifications, and customer satisfaction ratings from NASA personnel. Metrics might also include cost variance against projected budgets and compliance with safety and regulatory standards. Regular performance reviews against these KPIs are essential to ensure the contractor is meeting expectations and delivering value.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Manufacturing › Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing › Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing
Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD EQUIPMENT › MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD OF EQUIPMENT
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 165, BUFFALO GROVE, IL, 60089
Business Categories: Category Business, Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $27,524,071
Exercised Options: $27,524,071
Current Obligation: $27,269,248
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: NND06AG01C
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2006-07-01
Current End Date: 2017-04-30
Potential End Date: 2017-04-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2021-12-15
More Contracts from KAY and Associates, Inc.
- Award Cmss — $342.3M (Department of Defense)
- Federal Contract — $278.0M (Department of Defense)
- FA-18 CMS — $194.8M (Department of Defense)
- 200208!000254!5700!GJ20 !wr-Alc/Pko !F0965002C0025 !A!N! !Y! !20020510!20080531!067448076!067448076!067448076!n!kay and Associates, Inc !3820 North Ventura Drive !arlington Heig !il!60004!02154!031!17!arlington Heights !cook !illinois !+000003600000!n!n!000000000000!j066!maint & Repair of Eq/Instruments & LAB Equipment !c9e!all Other Supplies and Equipme!3000!not Discernable or Classified !541710!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!j!2!005!b! !C!N!Z! ! !Y!C!N! ! ! !a!d!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! — $37.6M (Department of Defense)
- Contractor Labor for Maintenance Function Requirements of Hmlat 303 Aircraft — $31.5M (Department of Defense)
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- TAS::80 0124::TAS Design, Development, Test&evaluation of Project Orion — $15.5B (Lockheed Martin Corp)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →