DoD's $195M FA-18 CMS Contract with Kay and Associates Raises Concerns Over Competition and Value

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $194,845,416 ($194.8M)

Contractor: KAY and Associates, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2011-07-01

End Date: 2017-01-31

Contract Duration: 2,041 days

Daily Burn Rate: $95.5K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: FA-18 CMS

Place of Performance

Location: BUFFALO GROVE, LAKE County, ILLINOIS, 60089

State: Illinois Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $194.8 million to KAY AND ASSOCIATES, INC. for work described as: FA-18 CMS Key points: 1. The contract awarded to Kay and Associates, Inc. for FA-18 CMS represents a significant expenditure of $194.8 million. 2. Lack of competition is a major concern, as the contract was not competed. 3. The cost-plus-fixed-fee (CPFF) pricing structure may incentivize cost overruns. 4. The 'Other Support Activities for Air Transportation' sector is broad, and specific value for money is unclear without more detail.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract's total value of $194.8 million is substantial. Without a competitive bidding process, it is difficult to assess if this price represents fair market value compared to similar support activities for air transportation.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

The contract was not competed, indicating a sole-source award. This significantly limits price discovery and potentially leads to higher costs for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: The absence of competition means taxpayers may be paying a premium for these services, as there was no market pressure to drive down costs.

Public Impact

Taxpayers may be overpaying due to the lack of competitive bidding. The long duration of the contract (2041) raises questions about long-term necessity and potential for future cost increases. Transparency in the justification for a sole-source award is crucial for public trust.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Sole-source award
  • Cost-plus-fixed-fee contract type
  • Lack of transparency in justification for sole-source
  • Long contract duration

Positive Signals

  • Contract supports critical defense systems (FA-18)
  • Established vendor (Kay and Associates, Inc.)

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under 'Other Support Activities for Air Transportation,' a broad category. Benchmarking spending in this specific niche is challenging without more granular data on the services provided under the FA-18 CMS program.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not awarded to a small business. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small business participation was considered or subcontracted.

Oversight & Accountability

The sole-source nature of this contract warrants close oversight to ensure the government is receiving fair value and that the contractor is performing efficiently. A thorough review of the justification for not competing the award is essential.

Related Government Programs

  • Other Support Activities for Air Transportation
  • Department of Defense Contracting
  • Defense Contract Management Agency Programs

Risk Flags

  • Lack of competition
  • Sole-source award justification unclear
  • Potential for cost overruns with CPFF
  • Broad service category lacks specificity
  • Long contract duration raises long-term value questions

Tags

other-support-activities-for-air-transpo, department-of-defense, il, definitive-contract, 100m-plus

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $194.8 million to KAY AND ASSOCIATES, INC.. FA-18 CMS

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is KAY AND ASSOCIATES, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $194.8 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2011-07-01. End: 2017-01-31.

What was the specific justification for awarding this contract on a sole-source basis, and were alternative competitive strategies considered?

The justification for a sole-source award is critical for understanding why competition was bypassed. Agencies typically require detailed documentation outlining the necessity, urgency, or unique capabilities that preclude a competitive process. Without this information, it's impossible to assess if taxpayer funds were used judiciously or if a more cost-effective solution could have been achieved through open competition.

How does the cost performance of this Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract compare to similar support contracts, and what mechanisms are in place to control costs?

CPFF contracts can incentivize contractors to increase costs to maximize their fixed fee. Analyzing the cost performance of this contract against benchmarks for similar services is vital. Oversight should focus on the contractor's cost control measures and the agency's ability to manage and audit expenditures effectively to prevent cost overruns and ensure value for money.

What specific services are included under 'Other Support Activities for Air Transportation' for the FA-18 CMS, and how is their effectiveness measured?

The broad categorization of 'Other Support Activities for Air Transportation' necessitates a clear definition of the services provided for the FA-18 CMS. Understanding the scope of work and the key performance indicators (KPIs) used to measure the effectiveness of these services is crucial. This allows for an assessment of whether the contract is meeting its objectives and delivering the intended operational benefits.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Transportation and WarehousingSupport Activities for Air TransportationOther Support Activities for Air Transportation

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD EQUIPMENTMAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD OF EQUIPMENT

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Solicitation ID: N0042111R0033

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 165 N ARLINGTON HEIGHTS RD STE 150, BUFFALO GROVE, IL, 60089

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $194,845,416

Exercised Options: $194,845,416

Current Obligation: $194,845,416

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline

Start Date: 2011-07-01

Current End Date: 2017-01-31

Potential End Date: 2017-01-31 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2021-08-23

More Contracts from KAY and Associates, Inc.

View all KAY and Associates, Inc. federal contracts →

Other Department of Defense Contracts

View all Department of Defense contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending