NASA's $15.5B Project Orion R&D contract to Lockheed Martin shows long-term investment in advanced propulsion
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $15,507,785,581 ($15.5B)
Contractor: Lockheed Martin Corp
Awarding Agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration
Start Date: 2006-09-06
End Date: 2026-09-30
Contract Duration: 7,329 days
Daily Burn Rate: $2.1M/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE
Sector: R&D
Official Description: TAS::80 0124::TAS DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT, TEST&EVALUATION OF PROJECT ORION
Place of Performance
Location: LITTLETON, DOUGLAS County, COLORADO, 80125
State: Colorado Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
National Aeronautics and Space Administration obligated $15.51 billion to LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP for work described as: TAS::80 0124::TAS DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT, TEST&EVALUATION OF PROJECT ORION Key points: 1. Significant long-term investment in advanced research and development. 2. Contract awarded through full and open competition, suggesting broad market engagement. 3. Cost-plus award fee structure incentivizes performance while managing cost uncertainty. 4. Extended contract duration indicates a complex, multi-phase project. 5. Focus on R&D in physical sciences aligns with ambitious space exploration goals. 6. Potential for significant technological advancements with broad application.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The total obligated amount of over $15.5 billion for this definitive contract is substantial, reflecting the scale and complexity of Project Orion. While a direct per-contract comparison is difficult due to the unique nature of advanced R&D, the cost-plus award fee structure is common for projects with high uncertainty, aiming to balance contractor incentive with cost control. Benchmarking value requires detailed analysis of milestones achieved against costs incurred, which is not fully available from the provided data.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple bidders likely had the opportunity to propose solutions. This competitive process is generally expected to yield better pricing and innovative approaches. The fact that it was competed suggests that NASA sought the best available technology and contractor capabilities for this critical R&D effort.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition typically benefits taxpayers by fostering a competitive environment that can drive down costs and improve the quality of services or products delivered.
Public Impact
Benefits the aerospace sector through significant investment in advanced propulsion technology. Delivers research and development services for Project Orion, potentially leading to breakthroughs in space exploration capabilities. Geographic impact is primarily within Colorado, where Lockheed Martin is headquartered, but the technological advancements could have global implications for space missions. Workforce implications include highly skilled jobs in engineering, research, and development within the aerospace industry.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Long contract duration (over 19 years) increases the risk of cost overruns and scope creep.
- Cost-plus award fee contracts can sometimes lead to higher overall costs compared to fixed-price contracts if not managed tightly.
- The highly specialized nature of the R&D may limit the number of qualified contractors, potentially impacting future competition.
- Technological risks inherent in developing novel propulsion systems could lead to delays or failure to meet objectives.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a robust selection process.
- Long-term commitment indicates strategic importance and potential for significant technological advancement.
- Cost-plus award fee structure provides incentives for performance and innovation.
- Contractor's extensive experience in aerospace and defense likely positions them well for this complex project.
- Focus on R&D aligns with NASA's mission to push the boundaries of space exploration.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Research and Development sector, specifically focusing on physical, engineering, and life sciences. The aerospace industry, a significant segment of this sector, heavily relies on R&D for advancements in propulsion, materials, and systems. The market size for aerospace R&D is substantial, driven by government agencies like NASA and the commercial space industry. This contract represents a major investment in a specific, cutting-edge area of aerospace technology.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates this contract was awarded under full and open competition and does not specify small business set-asides. Given the scale and technical complexity of Project Orion, it is likely that Lockheed Martin, as the prime contractor, may engage small businesses as subcontractors for specialized components or services. However, the primary award is to a large corporation, and direct small business set-aside analysis is not applicable to the prime contract itself.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by NASA's contracting officers and program managers, ensuring adherence to contract terms, milestones, and budget. The cost-plus award fee structure necessitates detailed financial and performance reporting from the contractor. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply to investigate potential fraud, waste, or abuse. Transparency is often limited for highly sensitive R&D projects, but NASA generally provides public updates on major program achievements.
Related Government Programs
- NASA Advanced Propulsion Research
- Space Exploration Technologies
- Advanced Materials Research
- Aerospace Engineering Services
- Department of Defense Research and Development Contracts
Risk Flags
- Long contract duration increases risk of cost escalation and technological obsolescence.
- Cost-plus award fee structure requires diligent oversight to ensure value for money.
- High R&D complexity implies potential for technical challenges and delays.
- Dependence on a single large contractor for a critical technology.
Tags
research-and-development, nasa, lockheed-martin-corp, colorado, definitive-contract, cost-plus-award-fee, full-and-open-competition, aerospace, propulsion-systems, long-term-contract, advanced-technology
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
National Aeronautics and Space Administration awarded $15.51 billion to LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP. TAS::80 0124::TAS DESIGN, DEVELOPMENT, TEST&EVALUATION OF PROJECT ORION
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is LOCKHEED MARTIN CORP.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: National Aeronautics and Space Administration (National Aeronautics and Space Administration).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $15.51 billion.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2006-09-06. End: 2026-09-30.
What is the historical spending trend for Project Orion or similar advanced propulsion R&D initiatives at NASA?
Historical spending on advanced propulsion R&D at NASA has varied significantly depending on strategic priorities and technological feasibility. Projects like the Space Shuttle main engines, the J-2X engine for the Ares program, and various nuclear thermal propulsion concepts have seen substantial, multi-year investments. While specific figures for 'Project Orion' prior to this award are not detailed, NASA's budget allocations for science and exploration consistently include significant portions for developing next-generation technologies. The $15.5 billion allocated here suggests a high priority and long-term commitment, potentially exceeding previous investments in comparable single propulsion R&D efforts due to the ambitious nature of the project.
How does the cost-plus award fee (CPAF) structure compare to other contract types for large-scale R&D projects?
The Cost-Plus Award Fee (CPAF) structure is commonly used for large-scale R&D projects where the final costs and performance outcomes are uncertain. Unlike fixed-price contracts, CPAF allows the contractor to recover allowable costs plus a fee that is composed of a base fee and an award amount. The award amount is contingent upon meeting or exceeding specific performance objectives, incentivizing the contractor to achieve high quality and efficiency. This contrasts with Cost-Plus-Fixed-Fee (CPFF), which offers less incentive for performance, or firm-fixed-price (FFP) contracts, which are generally unsuitable for R&D due to unpredictable costs. CPAF aims to balance cost control with performance incentives, making it a suitable, albeit complex, choice for projects like Project Orion.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) or milestones associated with this contract?
Specific key performance indicators (KPIs) and milestones for Project Orion are not publicly detailed in the contract award data. However, for a project of this nature, KPIs would likely revolve around technological advancements in propulsion efficiency, thrust generation, system reliability, and operational safety. Milestones would typically include successful design reviews, prototype development, ground testing phases, and potentially flight readiness assessments. The 'award fee' component of the contract suggests that NASA has defined specific performance criteria that Lockheed Martin must meet or exceed to earn the maximum fee, driving progress in these critical areas.
What is Lockheed Martin's track record with NASA on large, complex R&D contracts?
Lockheed Martin has a long and extensive track record of working with NASA on large, complex R&D and mission-critical contracts. They have been a key partner in numerous high-profile programs, including the James Webb Space Telescope, the Orion spacecraft (which shares a name with this project, though the propulsion focus is distinct), and various satellite development and launch services. Their experience spans advanced materials, spacecraft systems, and propulsion technologies. This history suggests a strong capability to manage intricate projects, meet demanding technical requirements, and navigate the complexities of government contracting, making them a suitable choice for Project Orion.
What are the potential risks associated with the long duration (nearly 20 years) of this contract?
The nearly 20-year duration of this contract presents several potential risks. Firstly, technological obsolescence is a concern; advancements in propulsion technology could emerge that make the project's initial goals outdated or less relevant. Secondly, cost escalation due to inflation, changing labor rates, and unforeseen material costs over such a long period is a significant risk, even with cost-reimbursement structures. Thirdly, program continuity and institutional knowledge can be challenging to maintain over decades, potentially leading to inefficiencies or loss of expertise. Finally, shifts in national priorities or budget constraints could impact sustained funding, jeopardizing the project's completion.
How does this contract align with NASA's broader strategic goals for space exploration?
This contract aligns directly with NASA's strategic goals of advancing human and robotic exploration beyond Earth orbit. Developing novel, high-efficiency propulsion systems like those likely envisioned for Project Orion is crucial for enabling faster, more cost-effective, and more capable missions to the Moon, Mars, and beyond. Such advancements are foundational to NASA's long-term vision of establishing a sustainable presence in deep space and expanding scientific discovery. The investment signifies a commitment to pushing the technological envelope required for ambitious future exploration endeavors.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Scientific Research and Development Services › Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences
Product/Service Code: RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT › Space R&D Services
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE (R)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 12257 STATE HIGHWAY, LITTLETON, CO, 80127
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $16,064,596,124
Exercised Options: $15,574,054,614
Current Obligation: $15,507,785,581
Actual Outlays: $3,490,858,746
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: YES
Timeline
Start Date: 2006-09-06
Current End Date: 2026-09-30
Potential End Date: 2026-09-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-03-26
More Contracts from Lockheed Martin Corp
- Federal Contract — $48.1B (Department of Energy)
- 200207!000021!5700!CZ62 !smc/Pkj LOS Angeles AFB !F0470102C0002 !A!N! !N! !20011116!20070630!872978978!196596688!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !1111 Lockheed Martin WAY !sunnyvale !ca!94089!77000!085!06!sunnyvale !santa Clara !california!+000012250000!n!n!000000000000!ar92!rdte/Space - Other - Applied Research !A2 !missile and Space Systems !3gfk!milstar !541710!E! !1! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !B! !d!n!j!2!001!n!2a!z!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! — $9.0B (Department of Defense)
- Next Generation Overhead Persistent Infrared Geosynchronous Earth Orbit Space Vehicle 1-3 Phase 1 — $7.3B (Department of Defense)
- Federal Contract — $7.3B (Department of Defense)
- 200009!2100!001246!SG60 !USA Space and Strategic DEF CDR !dasg6000c0072 !A!*!0 !20000628!20080503!188160782!834951691!834951691!n!23917!lockheed Martin Corporation !1111 Lockheed Martin WAY, !sunnyvale !ca!94089!77000!085!06!sunnyvale !santa Clara !california!0001!+000077527000!n!n!000000000000!ac23!rdte/Missile and Space Systems-Adv Tech DEV !A2 !missile and Space Systems !1cnx!thaad-Theater High ALT AIR Def!8731!1!*!*!*!b!a!*!c !n!r!1!001!n!1b!a!y!z!* !* !n!c!*!a!a!a!a!a!a!* !*!n!a!c!n!*!*!*!*!*! — $6.1B (Department of Defense)
Other National Aeronautics and Space Administration Contracts
- International Space Station — $22.4B (THE Boeing Company)
- Provide Developmental Hardware and Test Articles, and Manufacture and Assemble Ares I Upper Stages. the Upper Stage (US) Element IS an Integral Part of the Ares I Launch Vehicle and Provides the Second Stage of Flight. the US Element IS Responsible for the Roll Control During the First Stage Burn and Separation; and Will Provide the Guidance and Navigation, Command and Data Handling, and Other Avionics Functions for the Ares I During ALL Phases of the Ascent Flight. the US Element IS a NEW Design That Emphasizes Safety, Operability, and Minimum Life Cycle Cost. the Overall Design, Development, Test and Evaluation (ddt&e), Production, and Sustaining Engineering Efforts Include Activities Performed by Three Organizations; the Nasa Design Team (NDT), the Upper Stage Production Contractor (uspc) and the Instrument Unit Production Contractor (iupc). for Clarity, the Uspc Will BE Referred to AS the Contractor Throughout This Document. Nasa IS Responsible for the Integration of the Primary Elements of the Ares I Launch Vehicle Including: the First Stage, US Including Instrument Unit (IU), and US Engine; and Will Also Integrate the Ares I Launch Vehicle AT the Launch Site. Nasa IS Responsible for the Ddt&e, Including Technical and Programmatic Integration of the US Subsystems and Government-Furnished Property. Nasa Will Lead the Effort to Develop the Requirements and Specifications of the US Element, the Development Plan and Testing Requirements, and ALL Design Documentation, Initial Manufacturing and Assembly Process Planning, Logistics Planning, and Operations Support Planning. Development, Qualification, and Acceptance Testing Will BE Conducted by Nasa and the Contractor to Satisfy Requirements and for Risk Mitigation. Nasa IS Responsible for the Overall Upper Stage Verification and Validation Process and Will Require Support From the Contractor. the Contractor IS Responsible for the Manufacture and Assembly of the Upper Stage Test Flight and Operational Upper Stage Units Including the Installation of Upper Stage Instrument Unit, the Government-Furnished US Engine, Booster Separation Motors, and Other Government-Furnished Property. a Description of the Nasa Managed and Performed Efforts IS Contained in the US Work Packages and Will BE Made Available to the Contractor to Ensure Their Understanding of the Roles and Responsibilities of the NDT, Iupc, and Contractor During the Design, Development, and Operation of the US Element. the US Conceptual Design Described in the Uso-Clv-Se-25704 US Design Definition Document (DDD) IS the Baseline Design for This Contract. the Contractors Early Role Will BE to Provide Producibility Engineering Support to Nasa VIA the Established US Office Structure and to Provide Inputs Into the Final Design Configuration, Specifications, and Standards. Nasa Will Transition the Manufacturing and Assembly, Logistics Support Infrastructure, Configuration Management, and the Sustaining Engineering Functions to the Contractor AT the KEY Points During the Development and Implementation of the Program Currently Planned to Occur NO Later Than 90 Days After the Completion of the Following Major Milestones: Manufacturing and Assembly US Preliminary Design Review (PDR) Logistics Support Infrastructure US PDR Configuration Management US Critical Design Review CDR) Sustaining Engineering US Design Certification Review (DCR) After the Completion of an Orderly Transition of Roles and Responsibilities to the Contractor, Nasa Will Assume an Insight Role Into the Contractors Production, Sustaining Engineering, and Operations Support of the Ares I US Test Program and Flight Hardware. After DCR, the Contractor Will BE Responsible for Sustaining Engineering PER SOW Section 4.7, AS Necessary to Maintain and Support the US Configuration and for Production and Operations Support — $10.5B (THE Boeing Company)
- Space Program Operations Contract (spoc) — $8.5B (United Space Alliance, LLC)
- Joint Us/Russian Human Space Flight Activities — $4.7B (Russia Space Agency)
- First DDT and E, Ares I-X, and Flight Tests. First Stage Will BE a Five Segment, Solid Rocket Booster Derived From the Space Shuttle Program (SSP) Solid Rocket Booster (srb)/Reusable Solid Rocket Motor (rsrm). the Contractor Shall Furnish the Necessary Management, Engineering, Labor, Facilities, Tools, Equipment, and Materials Required for First Stage Development, Qualification, Certification and Acceptance Program. Activities Include: Redesign and Testing of the Motor to Incorporate the Fifth Segment and Production of Five Full Scale Ground Static Test Motors: TWO Development Motors (dms)-And Three Qualification Motors (QMS); Structural Test Article (STA), Ground Vibration Test Motors (gvtms) and Other Development Testing; Redesign of the Avionics, Deceleration, Separation, and Flight Termination System (FTS) Subsystems; Ares I-X: Simulated Ares I Outer Mold Line/Mass Properties Using Modified Srb/Rsrm; and Three Flight Test Vehicles. TAS::80 0124::TAS — $4.4B (Northrop Grumman Systems Corporation)
View all National Aeronautics and Space Administration contracts →