Navy awards $17.6M construction contract to Triton Marine Construction Corp. for unspecified heavy civil engineering

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $17,638,322 ($17.6M)

Contractor: Triton Marine Construction Corp.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2007-10-30

End Date: 2009-11-28

Contract Duration: 760 days

Daily Burn Rate: $23.2K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 6

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: BASE BID / OPTION 1/ OPTION 2

Place of Performance

Location: PHILADELPHIA, PHILADELPHIA County, PENNSYLVANIA, 19112

State: Pennsylvania Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $17.6 million to TRITON MARINE CONSTRUCTION CORP. for work described as: BASE BID / OPTION 1/ OPTION 2 Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable for heavy civil engineering projects of this nature, though specific scope is needed for precise benchmarking. 2. Full and open competition suggests a healthy market for these services, potentially leading to competitive pricing. 3. Contract duration of 760 days indicates a significant project with potential for extended resource allocation. 4. The definitive contract type suggests a clear scope of work was established upfront. 5. Fixed-price contract structure shifts performance risk to the contractor, incentivizing cost control. 6. Geographic location in Pennsylvania may influence labor and material costs.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

Benchmarking this contract's value is challenging without a detailed scope of work. However, the base bid of $17.6 million falls within a typical range for substantial heavy and civil engineering construction projects. The firm-fixed-price structure implies that the contractor is responsible for managing costs to meet the agreed-upon price, which can be a good indicator of value if the scope is well-defined and the contractor has a strong track record. Further analysis would require comparing the specific deliverables against similar projects awarded by the Navy or other federal agencies.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple bidders were likely solicited and considered. This method is generally preferred as it allows for the widest possible participation from qualified contractors, fostering a competitive environment. The presence of 6 bidders, as suggested by the 'no' field, points to a robust level of competition for this particular project, which should theoretically drive down prices and improve the quality of proposals received.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition generally benefits taxpayers by ensuring that the government receives the best possible value through a competitive bidding process. This approach helps to prevent inflated pricing and encourages efficiency among contractors vying for the work.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are likely the Department of the Navy, receiving essential construction services for its infrastructure. The contract supports the delivery of heavy and civil engineering construction, crucial for maintaining and developing military facilities. The project's geographic impact is centered in Pennsylvania, potentially creating local employment opportunities and stimulating the regional economy. The workforce implications include employment for skilled construction labor, engineers, and project managers in the Pennsylvania area.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of specific project details makes it difficult to assess the true value and potential risks.
The broad NAICS code (237990) encompasses a wide range of activities, making it hard to pinpoint the exact nature of the work and associated risks.
Contract duration of over two years could be subject to delays and cost overruns if not managed effectively.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process that should yield fair pricing.
Firm-fixed-price contract type transfers cost overrun risk to the contractor, providing budget certainty for the government.
The contractor, Triton Marine Construction Corp., has experience in construction, though specific project relevance needs further investigation.

Sector Analysis

The construction sector, particularly heavy and civil engineering, is a significant area of federal spending. This contract falls under the 'Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction' category (NAICS 237990), which includes a broad range of projects such as dams, levees, waterways, and marine construction. Federal agencies, especially the Department of Defense, frequently contract for such services to maintain and upgrade critical infrastructure. Comparable spending benchmarks are difficult to establish without knowing the specific scope, but projects of this magnitude often range from tens to hundreds of millions of dollars.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, the primary contractor, Triton Marine Construction Corp., is likely a large business. There is no explicit information regarding subcontracting plans for small businesses. Without a small business subcontracting plan requirement, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem for this specific contract may be limited, though the prime contractor's own supply chain could still involve smaller firms.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the Department of the Navy's contracting and program management offices. As a definitive contract, it implies a defined scope and terms, allowing for performance monitoring against those established criteria. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract databases like FPDS, where basic award information is publicly available. The specific Inspector General jurisdiction would be that of the Department of Defense.

Related Government Programs

Military Construction
Naval Facilities Engineering Command Contracts
Heavy and Civil Engineering Services
Infrastructure Improvement Projects

Risk Flags

Lack of specific scope details
Potential for cost overruns if scope is underestimated
Contract duration may lead to schedule risks

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $17.6 million to TRITON MARINE CONSTRUCTION CORP.. BASE BID / OPTION 1/ OPTION 2

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is TRITON MARINE CONSTRUCTION CORP..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $17.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2007-10-30. End: 2009-11-28.

What is the specific scope of work for this $17.6 million construction contract awarded to Triton Marine Construction Corp.?

The provided data indicates the contract falls under NAICS code 237990, 'Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction,' and was awarded by the Department of the Navy. However, the specific scope of work is not detailed. This category can encompass a wide array of projects, including but not limited to marine construction, dredging, land reclamation, construction of dams, levees, canals, and other water-related infrastructure. Without further details on the project's objectives, location specifics beyond Pennsylvania, and required deliverables, it is impossible to provide a precise description of the services rendered. This lack of specificity hinders a thorough assessment of the contract's value and associated risks.

How does the $17.6 million award compare to similar heavy civil engineering construction contracts awarded by the Department of the Navy?

Comparing the $17.6 million award requires knowledge of the specific type of heavy civil engineering work performed. For instance, if this contract is for routine maintenance or minor upgrades, it might be on the higher end. Conversely, if it involves a major new construction project, such as a significant pier expansion or a large-scale dredging operation, $17.6 million could represent a moderate or even low value. The Department of the Navy, through entities like the Naval Facilities Engineering Command (NAVFAC), awards numerous construction contracts annually. A comprehensive comparison would necessitate analyzing the scope, duration, and complexity of other NAVFAC contracts within the same NAICS code or similar project types over a relevant period.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) and risk mitigation strategies associated with this contract?

Specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for this contract are not detailed in the provided data. However, for a firm-fixed-price construction contract, typical KPIs would likely revolve around schedule adherence (meeting milestones and final completion date), quality of work (compliance with specifications and standards), safety performance (incident rates), and budget management (completing the project within the fixed price). Risk mitigation strategies would be the responsibility of the contractor, Triton Marine Construction Corp., given the fixed-price nature. These could include detailed project planning, robust subcontractor management, securing appropriate insurance, proactive identification and management of potential site conditions or material supply issues, and maintaining a strong safety program. The government's role in oversight would involve monitoring progress against the contract requirements and ensuring compliance.

What is Triton Marine Construction Corp.'s track record with federal contracts, particularly with the Department of the Navy?

Triton Marine Construction Corp. has been awarded federal contracts, including this $17.6 million definitive contract by the Department of the Navy. To assess their track record, a deeper dive into their contract history is necessary. This would involve examining past performance evaluations, the types and values of previous contracts, their success rate in completing projects on time and within budget, and any history of disputes or contract terminations. Information from sources like the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS) or the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) would be crucial for a comprehensive understanding of their reliability and capability in executing similar projects for the Navy or other federal agencies.

How does the contract duration of 760 days (approximately 2 years) impact the overall value and risk profile?

A contract duration of 760 days suggests a project of considerable scale and complexity, requiring sustained effort and resource allocation. From a value perspective, a longer duration can sometimes lead to higher indirect costs (e.g., project management, overhead) but also allows for more thorough execution and potentially better quality. However, extended timelines also increase exposure to risks such as inflation affecting material costs (though mitigated by fixed-price), changes in regulatory requirements, unforeseen site conditions, and potential delays due to weather or other external factors. For the government, a longer contract duration means funds are committed for a longer period. The fixed-price nature helps contain the final cost, but effective government oversight is crucial to ensure progress and prevent scope creep or unnecessary extensions.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction › Other Heavy and Civil Engineering Construction

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: TWO STEP

Solicitation ID: N4008507R4504

Offers Received: 6

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 2181 CHICO WAY N.W., BREMERTON, WA, 98312

Business Categories: Category Business, Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $17,638,322

Exercised Options: $17,638,322

Current Obligation: $17,638,322

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline