DoD's $30.6M Cutler Naval Facility Power Project Awarded to Triton Marine Construction

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $30,596,571 ($30.6M)

Contractor: Triton Marine Construction Corp.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2016-04-08

End Date: 2018-10-25

Contract Duration: 930 days

Daily Burn Rate: $32.9K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: IGF::OT::IGF, P 308 COMMERCIAL POWER CONNECTION, CUTLER ME

Place of Performance

Location: CUTLER, WASHINGTON County, MAINE, 04626

State: Maine Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $30.6 million to TRITON MARINE CONSTRUCTION CORP. for work described as: IGF::OT::IGF, P 308 COMMERCIAL POWER CONNECTION, CUTLER ME Key points: 1. The contract awarded to Triton Marine Construction Corp. for power infrastructure at Cutler, ME, represents a significant investment in naval facility resilience. 2. The project falls under the 'Power and Communication Line and Related Structures Construction' NAICS code, indicating a specialized construction need. 3. With a firm fixed-price contract type, the financial risk is largely borne by the contractor, which can incentivize cost control. 4. The absence of small business participation in this specific award warrants further examination to ensure equitable opportunity.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $30.6 million for a 930-day duration appears substantial for power and communication line construction. Benchmarking against similar Department of Defense projects of this scale and complexity would be necessary to definitively assess its value.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a robust price discovery process. However, the specific details of the bidding and evaluation are not provided, making it difficult to fully assess the competitive dynamics and their impact on the final price.

Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition is generally favorable for taxpayers as it aims to secure the best value. The final price reflects the outcome of this competitive process.

Public Impact

Enhances critical infrastructure at a naval facility, ensuring operational continuity. Supports regional economic activity through construction employment and material sourcing. The project's success is vital for the operational readiness of the naval base. Long-term maintenance and operational costs associated with the new infrastructure should be considered.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of small business participation
Potential for cost overruns if scope changes
Long project duration increases exposure to market fluctuations

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition
Firm fixed-price contract type mitigates cost risk for the government
Strategic investment in critical infrastructure

Sector Analysis

This project falls within the construction sector, specifically related to utility infrastructure. Spending benchmarks for similar power and communication line construction projects for federal agencies, particularly the Department of Defense, would provide context for the $30.6 million award.

Small Business Impact

The award data indicates that small businesses were not involved in this contract, as the 'sb' field is false. Further analysis would be needed to determine if small business set-aside goals were considered or if opportunities were missed.

Oversight & Accountability

The Department of the Navy, as the contracting agency, is responsible for oversight. The definitive contract award suggests a structured process, but ongoing monitoring of performance, cost, and adherence to contract terms is crucial for accountability.

Related Government Programs

Power and Communication Line and Related Structures Construction
Department of Defense Contracting
Department of the Navy Programs

Risk Flags

Lack of small business participation
Long contract duration (930 days) increases exposure to unforeseen risks
Potential for scope creep if project requirements evolve
Dependence on a single contractor for critical infrastructure

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $30.6 million to TRITON MARINE CONSTRUCTION CORP.. IGF::OT::IGF, P 308 COMMERCIAL POWER CONNECTION, CUTLER ME

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is TRITON MARINE CONSTRUCTION CORP..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $30.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2016-04-08. End: 2018-10-25.

What specific factors contributed to the $30.6 million price for this power connection project, and how do they compare to industry standards for similar naval base infrastructure upgrades?

The $30.6 million price likely reflects the complexity of integrating new power infrastructure into an existing naval facility, including specialized materials, labor, site preparation, and compliance with stringent military standards. Benchmarking against similar DoD projects would reveal if this cost is within the expected range, considering factors like geographic location, specific technological requirements, and the duration of the project (930 days).

Given the firm fixed-price contract, what are the primary risks to the government regarding cost and schedule if unforeseen issues arise during the 930-day performance period?

With a firm fixed-price contract, the primary risk to the government is limited regarding cost overruns, as the contractor assumes most of that risk. However, schedule delays caused by the contractor could still impact operational readiness. Unforeseen issues might lead to change orders, which, if approved, could increase costs, or potentially disputes if the government believes the contractor is not managing risks effectively.

How effectively does the 'full and open competition' method ensure optimal value and performance for specialized infrastructure projects like this naval power connection, especially considering the la

Full and open competition is designed to maximize value by encouraging broad participation and driving down prices through rivalry. For specialized projects, it can attract highly capable large firms. However, the absence of small business participation suggests a potential gap in outreach or opportunity creation, which could limit the diversity of solutions and potentially exclude innovative smaller entities that might offer competitive value or specialized expertise.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Utility System Construction › Power and Communication Line and Related Structures Construction

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: N4008515R8749

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 5405 CONSTANCE DR SW, BREMERTON, WA, 98312

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $30,596,571

Exercised Options: $30,596,571

Current Obligation: $30,596,571

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline