DoD's $24.17M contract with Zeiders Enterprises Inc. for individual and family services awarded in 2002
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $24,171,826 ($24.2M)
Contractor: Zeiders Enterprises, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2002-09-30
End Date: 2011-06-21
Contract Duration: 3,186 days
Daily Burn Rate: $7.6K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Other
Place of Performance
Location: WOODBRIDGE, PRINCE WILLIAM County, VIRGINIA, 22192
State: Virginia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $24.2 million to ZEIDERS ENTERPRISES, INC. for work described as: Key points: 1. Contract value of $24.17 million over its lifecycle. 2. Awarded under full and open competition. 3. Contract duration of 3,186 days (approximately 8.7 years). 4. Firm Fixed Price contract type. 5. Services provided under NAICS code 624190 (Other Individual and Family Services). 6. Contract awarded by the Department of Defense. 7. Contract administered by the Defense Contract Management Agency. 8. Contract awarded in September 2002 and ended in June 2011.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The total contract value of $24.17 million spread over nearly nine years suggests a moderate annual spend. Without specific performance metrics or comparable contract data, it's difficult to definitively assess value for money. The firm fixed-price nature implies that the contractor bore the risk of cost overruns, which can be a positive indicator for cost control. However, the lack of detailed cost breakdowns or performance benchmarks makes a precise value assessment challenging.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple bidders had the opportunity to submit proposals. With 3 bids received, this suggests a reasonable level of competition for the services sought. A competitive bidding process generally leads to better price discovery and potentially more favorable terms for the government.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers likely benefited from a competitive process that aimed to secure the best possible price and service quality for the required individual and family services.
Public Impact
Beneficiaries include individuals and families requiring support services, likely within the military community given the DoD awarding agency. Services delivered fall under the broad category of 'Other Individual and Family Services'. Geographic impact is likely concentrated where the Department of Defense has a presence, primarily within the United States. Workforce implications would involve the employment of individuals providing these direct services, managed by Zeiders Enterprises, Inc.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Long contract duration (nearly 9 years) could lead to potential for scope creep or evolving service needs not fully captured in the initial award.
- Lack of detailed performance data makes it difficult to assess the effectiveness and efficiency of the services provided over the contract's lifespan.
- Firm Fixed Price contracts, while good for cost certainty, can sometimes incentivize contractors to minimize service quality if not rigorously overseen.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a robust bidding process.
- Firm Fixed Price contract type provides cost certainty for the government.
- Contract duration of almost nine years indicates a stable, long-term relationship for essential services.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically focusing on individual and family support services. The market for such services is often driven by government needs, particularly for military and veteran populations. Benchmarking spending in this specific sub-sector can be challenging due to the specialized nature of the services, but overall government spending on social and support services is substantial.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses, nor does it explicitly mention subcontracting plans. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem is likely minimal unless Zeiders Enterprises, Inc. utilized small businesses as subcontractors, which is not detailed in the provided information.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would have been managed by the Defense Contract Management Agency (DCMA), responsible for ensuring contractor performance and compliance. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm fixed-price structure, requiring the contractor to deliver services within the agreed-upon cost. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases, though detailed performance reports may not be publicly accessible.
Related Government Programs
- Department of Defense Family Support Programs
- Military OneSource
- TRICARE Behavioral Health Services
- Veterans Affairs Family Support Services
Risk Flags
- Long contract duration may indicate potential for evolving requirements.
- Lack of detailed performance metrics hinders assessment of service effectiveness.
- Firm Fixed Price contracts require careful monitoring to ensure quality is not compromised for cost.
Tags
defense, department-of-defense, individual-and-family-services, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, zeiders-enterprises-inc, defense-contract-management-agency, virginia, professional-scientific-and-technical-services, naics-624190
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $24.2 million to ZEIDERS ENTERPRISES, INC.. See the official description on USAspending.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is ZEIDERS ENTERPRISES, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $24.2 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2002-09-30. End: 2011-06-21.
What specific types of individual and family services were provided under this contract?
The contract falls under NAICS code 624190, 'Other Individual and Family Services.' While the specific details are not provided in the summary data, this category typically encompasses a wide range of services aimed at supporting individuals and families facing various challenges. Examples could include counseling, case management, crisis intervention, support for military families during deployments, assistance with relocation, or programs designed to enhance family well-being and resilience. The Department of Defense likely procured these services to support service members and their families, addressing needs related to military life, deployment, and overall quality of life.
How does the $24.17 million contract value compare to similar DoD contracts for family services?
Comparing the $24.17 million contract value requires context regarding the scope, duration, and specific services offered. Awarded in 2002 and spanning nearly nine years, the average annual value was approximately $2.78 million. This figure needs to be benchmarked against other DoD contracts for similar family support services, considering factors like the number of individuals or families served, the geographic reach, and the complexity of the services. Without access to a database of comparable contracts, it's challenging to definitively state whether this represents high, low, or average spending. However, the substantial total value suggests a significant program.
What were the key performance indicators (KPIs) or success metrics for this contract?
The provided summary data does not include specific Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) or success metrics for this contract. Typically, for contracts involving individual and family services, KPIs might include client satisfaction rates, successful case closures, adherence to service delivery timelines, achievement of specific therapeutic or support goals for clients, and compliance with program regulations. The firm fixed-price nature suggests that the contractor was obligated to deliver the defined scope of services, but the effectiveness and quality of those services would ideally be measured against pre-defined metrics, which are not detailed here.
What is the track record of Zeiders Enterprises, Inc. in providing government services, particularly to the DoD?
Zeiders Enterprises, Inc. has a history of providing services to government agencies, including the Department of Defense. Their focus often lies in areas such as military family support, behavioral health, and readiness programs. While this specific $24.17 million contract ran from 2002 to 2011, the company has continued to secure and perform on various government contracts. A comprehensive assessment of their track record would involve reviewing their performance on other contracts, including client feedback, any past performance issues or awards, and their overall experience in delivering similar services to military populations.
Were there any notable risks or challenges associated with this contract during its performance period?
Potential risks associated with a long-term contract like this, spanning nearly nine years, could include changes in government requirements, evolving needs of the military community, contractor performance issues, or challenges in service delivery. Without specific contract performance reports or Inspector General findings, it's difficult to identify concrete risks that materialized. However, common challenges in family support services can involve client engagement, managing sensitive personal information, ensuring cultural competency, and adapting to the unique stressors faced by military families. The firm fixed-price structure could also pose a risk if the scope was not adequately defined, potentially leading to disputes or under-delivery if costs escalated unexpectedly for the contractor.
How did the 'full and open competition' impact the pricing and service quality compared to other contracting methods?
Awarding the contract through 'full and open competition' generally implies that all responsible sources were permitted to submit a bid. This competitive environment typically drives down prices as contractors vie for the award by offering their best terms. It also allows the government to select from a wider pool of potential providers, potentially leading to higher quality services if the evaluation criteria emphasize both price and technical merit. Compared to sole-source or limited competition, full and open competition is often seen as the most effective method for achieving both cost savings and optimal service delivery for the government, assuming a sufficient number of capable bidders participate.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Health Care and Social Assistance › Individual and Family Services › Other Individual and Family Services
Product/Service Code: SOCIAL SERVICES › SOCIAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 3421 COMMISSION COURT, WOODBRIDGE, VA, 07
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business
Contract Characteristics
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2002-09-30
Current End Date: 2011-06-21
Potential End Date: 2011-06-21 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2010-06-21
More Contracts from Zeiders Enterprises, Inc.
- Personal Financial Services (PFC) — $165.3M (Department of the Interior)
- Mflc Support - Personal Financial Counseling Igf::ot::igf — $117.0M (Department of the Interior)
- "igf::ot::igf" DOD Spouse Education Career Opportunities(seco)program Support — $78.8M (Department of the Interior)
- 200301!000050!1700!RA10A !fleet & Industrial Supply Center!n0018901d0254 !A!N! !Y!0003 !20021001!20030930!130440118!130440118!130440118!n!zeiders Enterprises, Inc !3421 Commission Court !woodbridge !va!22192!57000!710!51!norfolk !norfolk (city) !virginia !+000006440251!n!n!000000000000!g099!other Social Services !S1 !services !2000!NOT Discernable or Classified !541990!E! !5!A!S! ! !D!20030930!B! ! !A! !a!n!j!2!002!b! !C!N!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!c!a!a!000!a!b!n! ! ! ! ! !N62688!0001! ! — $70.2M (Department of Defense)
- Spouse Education and Career Opportunities Seco — $61.2M (General Services Administration)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)