GSA awards $61.1M contract for administrative management consulting, with 3 bidders competing

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $61,181,504 ($61.2M)

Contractor: Zeiders Enterprises, Inc.

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2023-02-27

End Date: 2026-02-26

Contract Duration: 1,095 days

Daily Burn Rate: $55.9K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS

Sector: Other

Official Description: SPOUSE EDUCATION AND CAREER OPPORTUNITIES SECO

Place of Performance

Location: WOODBRIDGE, PRINCE WILLIAM County, VIRGINIA, 22192

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $61.2 million to ZEIDERS ENTERPRISES, INC. for work described as: SPOUSE EDUCATION AND CAREER OPPORTUNITIES SECO Key points: 1. The contract value of $61.1 million over three years suggests a significant investment in management consulting services. 2. With three bidders, the competition level indicates a moderately contested market for these services. 3. The contract's duration of 1095 days allows for sustained support but also necessitates ongoing performance monitoring. 4. The primary service category, Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services, is broad and essential for agency operations. 5. The contract is positioned within the administrative support sector, a common area for federal procurement. 6. The absence of small business set-aside flags indicates this was likely awarded based on best value or lowest price technically acceptable to a larger entity.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract's total value of $61.1 million over three years averages to approximately $20.36 million annually. Benchmarking this against similar contracts for administrative management consulting services requires access to a broader dataset of federal procurements. However, the presence of three bidders suggests a competitive pricing environment, which typically leads to fair market value. Without specific per-unit cost data, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging, but the competitive nature of the award is a positive indicator.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, meaning all responsible sources were permitted to submit offers. Three bidders participated in the competition. This level of competition is generally considered healthy, suggesting that multiple firms were interested and capable of providing the required services. A moderate number of bidders can lead to competitive pricing and a wider range of innovative solutions, though a higher number of bidders often drives prices down further.

Taxpayer Impact: For taxpayers, three bidders indicate a reasonable level of competition, which should help ensure that the government is not overpaying for these essential administrative consulting services. It strikes a balance between ensuring broad access for potential contractors and maintaining a manageable evaluation process.

Public Impact

Federal agencies requiring administrative management and general management consulting services will benefit from the expertise provided under this contract. The services delivered are expected to enhance operational efficiency, strategic planning, and overall management effectiveness within the procuring agency. The geographic impact is primarily focused on the agency's operational locations, likely within the United States. The contract supports a workforce of consultants, contributing to employment within the professional services sector.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep if the administrative management needs are not clearly defined and managed.
Reliance on a single awardee for critical management functions could pose a risk if performance falters.
Ensuring consistent quality of consulting services across the contract duration requires robust oversight.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a robust selection process.
The contract duration allows for the development of long-term strategic improvements.
The specified service category is crucial for efficient government operations.

Sector Analysis

The federal sector for administrative management and general management consulting services is substantial, with agencies consistently procuring expertise to improve efficiency and effectiveness. This contract falls within a broad category of professional services that support various government functions. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically involve analyzing the total federal outlays for NAICS code 541611, which includes management consulting, administrative support, and general management consulting. The $61.1 million award is a significant, but not extraordinary, sum for a three-year engagement in this space.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). This suggests that the competition was open to all responsible sources, including large businesses. While this contract may not directly benefit small businesses through a set-aside, the prime contractor, ZEIDERS ENTERPRISES, INC., may engage small businesses as subcontractors. The extent of small business subcontracting would depend on the prime contractor's strategy and the specific requirements of the contract, which are not detailed here.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the General Services Administration (GSA) Federal Acquisition Service, which awarded the contract. Accountability measures are typically embedded within the contract terms, including performance standards, reporting requirements, and payment schedules tied to deliverables. Transparency is facilitated through contract databases like FPDS, where award details are publicly available. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse is suspected.

Related Government Programs

Management and Financial Consulting, Acquisition and Grants Management Support, and Business and Special Management Services
Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services
Management Consulting Services

Risk Flags

Potential for vendor lock-in if contract is not managed effectively.
Risk of performance degradation over the contract's multi-year term.
Need for clear definition of services to avoid scope creep.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $61.2 million to ZEIDERS ENTERPRISES, INC.. SPOUSE EDUCATION AND CAREER OPPORTUNITIES SECO

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ZEIDERS ENTERPRISES, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $61.2 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2023-02-27. End: 2026-02-26.

What is the track record of ZEIDERS ENTERPRISES, INC. in performing similar administrative management consulting contracts for the federal government?

To assess ZEIDERS ENTERPRISES, INC.'s track record, one would need to examine their past performance on federal contracts, particularly those involving administrative management and general management consulting services (NAICS 541611). This involves reviewing contract databases for previous awards to the company, analyzing their performance ratings (if available), and identifying any past issues or commendations. A history of successful contract completions, positive performance evaluations, and minimal disputes would indicate a strong track record. Conversely, a pattern of underperformance, contract terminations, or significant disputes would raise concerns about their capability to successfully execute this $61.1 million award.

How does the average annual value of this contract ($20.36 million) compare to other federal contracts for similar administrative management consulting services?

The average annual value of approximately $20.36 million for this contract is substantial. To benchmark this effectively, we would need to compare it against the distribution of contract values for NAICS code 541611 over a relevant period. Federal procurement data often shows a wide range in contract sizes, from small, specialized engagements to large, multi-year programs. If this value falls within the upper quartile of contract values for similar services, it suggests a significant scope of work. If it is closer to the median, it represents a more typical large-scale engagement. Without specific comparative data, it's difficult to definitively state if it's high or low, but it indicates a considerable investment by the GSA.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) that will be used to measure the success of ZEIDERS ENTERPRISES, INC. under this contract?

Key Performance Indicators (KPIs) for this contract would be defined in the Performance Work Statement (PWS) or Statement of Work (SOW). These KPIs are crucial for measuring the contractor's success and ensuring value for money. Typical KPIs for administrative management consulting might include metrics related to efficiency improvements (e.g., reduction in processing times, cost savings achieved), effectiveness of implemented strategies (e.g., achievement of strategic goals, improved organizational performance), client satisfaction (measured through surveys or feedback), timeliness of deliverables, and adherence to budget. The specific KPIs would be tailored to the precise needs of the GSA Federal Acquisition Service and the objectives outlined in the contract.

What is the potential risk associated with the three-year duration of this contract in terms of adaptability to changing federal priorities?

A three-year duration for an administrative management consulting contract presents a moderate risk regarding adaptability to changing federal priorities. While it allows for sustained effort and the implementation of longer-term strategies, federal priorities can shift significantly within this timeframe due to new administrations, legislative changes, or evolving national needs. The contract's flexibility, through change order clauses and the ability to modify the scope of work, will be critical. If the contract is rigidly defined and lacks mechanisms for adaptation, the services provided might become less relevant or misaligned with current government objectives by the end of the term. Robust contract management and proactive communication between the GSA and ZEIDERS ENTERPRISES, INC. are essential to mitigate this risk.

How does the procurement method (full and open competition with 3 bidders) influence the potential for innovation from the contractor?

Full and open competition generally fosters innovation by allowing a wide range of potential contractors to propose their best solutions. With three bidders, there was a reasonable level of competition, which encourages firms to differentiate themselves through innovative approaches to meet the government's needs. However, the degree of innovation realized also depends on how the solicitation was structured. If the Request for Proposal (RFP) clearly articulated performance-based requirements and allowed for creative solutions, innovation is more likely. If the RFP was highly prescriptive, it might limit the contractor's ability to introduce novel methods. The evaluation criteria would also play a role; if innovation is a significant factor in the evaluation, bidders will be more incentivized to propose it.

What is the historical spending trend for administrative management and general management consulting services by the General Services Administration?

Analyzing the historical spending trend for administrative management and general management consulting services (NAICS 541611) by the General Services Administration (GSA) would involve examining procurement data over several fiscal years. GSA, as a major procurement agency, consistently spends on these services to support its own operations and those of other federal agencies. Trends might show an increase or decrease in spending based on agency needs, budget allocations, and shifts towards or away from outsourcing certain functions. Understanding this trend provides context for the $61.1 million award, indicating whether it represents a typical level of investment, an expansion, or a contraction in GSA's reliance on external consulting expertise in this domain.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Solicitation ID: 47QFCA22Q0005

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS (Z)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 2750 KILLARNEY DRIVE SUITE 100, WOODBRIDGE, VA, 22192

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $103,685,621

Exercised Options: $80,382,886

Current Obligation: $61,181,504

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS02F0234W

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline