DoD Defense IT Contract Awarded to ICF Jacob & Sundstrom for $11.5M, Full and Open Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $11,499,145 ($11.5M)

Contractor: ICF Jacob & Sundstrom, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2005-10-21

End Date: 2010-09-17

Contract Duration: 1,792 days

Daily Burn Rate: $6.4K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COMBINATION (APPLIES TO AWARDS WHERE TWO OR MORE OF THE ABOVE APPLY)

Sector: IT

Official Description: 200607!602590!9700!HC1013!DEFENSE INFO. TECHNOLOGY CONTRAC!GS35F4997G !C!N! !N!HC101306F2065!P00004!20060406!20060930!004853412!004853412!004853412!N!JACOB & SUNDSTROM INC !401 E PRATT ST STE 2214 !BALTIMORE !MD!21202!03000!013!51!ARLINGTON !ARLINGTON !VIRGINIA !+000001363964!N!N!000000000000!D399!OTHER ADP & TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !NOT DISCERNABLE !541519!A!A!6! ! !D! ! !99990909!B!E!Y! ! !A! ! ! !000! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !B!N! ! ! ! ! ! ! !000! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! !

Place of Performance

Location: ALEXANDRIA, ALEXANDRIA CITY County, VIRGINIA, 22301

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $11.5 million to ICF JACOB & SUNDSTROM, INC. for work described as: 200607!602590!9700!HC1013!DEFENSE INFO. TECHNOLOGY CONTRAC!GS35F4997G !C!N! !N!HC101306F2065!P00004!20060406!20060930!004853412!004853412!004853412!N!JACOB & SUNDSTROM INC !401 E PRATT ST STE 2214 !BALTIMORE !MD!21202!03000!013!51!ARLINGTON !ARLI… Key points: 1. Contract awarded for Defense Information Technology Services, indicating a need for specialized IT support within the DoD. 2. The award to ICF Jacob & Sundstrom, Inc. suggests a competitive market for these services, with established players. 3. Potential risk lies in the long performance period (2005-2010), which could lead to cost overruns or outdated technology. 4. The sector is IT services, a critical area for defense operations, requiring robust and secure solutions.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $11.5M over approximately 5 years is difficult to benchmark without specific per-unit cost data. However, the duration suggests a significant, ongoing need for services.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating a robust price discovery process. This method generally leads to more competitive pricing for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is beneficial for taxpayers as it encourages multiple bidders, driving down costs and ensuring value for money.

Public Impact

Taxpayers are impacted by the $11.5 million expenditure for defense IT services. The contract supports the Department of Defense's information technology infrastructure, crucial for national security. The long-term nature of the contract suggests a sustained demand for these IT services within the government.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 64 / 10

Warning Flags

Long performance period (2005-2010) may lead to cost escalation or technology obsolescence.
Lack of specific per-unit cost data makes detailed value assessment challenging.
Contract is for 'Other ADP & Telecommunication Services', a broad category that could mask specific cost drivers.

Positive Signals

Awarded under full and open competition, suggesting competitive pricing.
Contract supports critical defense information technology needs.
The awardee is an established entity in the government contracting space.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the IT services sector, specifically 'Other ADP & Telecommunication Services'. Spending in this area for defense is substantial, driven by the need for advanced communication and data processing capabilities.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, small businesses likely did not have a direct opportunity to bid on this specific award, though they may be involved as subcontractors.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a degree of oversight in the bidding process. However, the long duration necessitates ongoing monitoring to ensure performance and cost control.

Related Government Programs

Custom Computer Programming Services
Department of Defense Contracting
Defense Information Systems Agency Programs

Risk Flags

Long contract duration (2005-2010)
Broad service category ('Other ADP & Telecommunication Services')
Lack of detailed per-unit cost data
Potential for technology obsolescence over the contract term

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $11.5 million to ICF JACOB & SUNDSTROM, INC.. 200607!602590!9700!HC1013!DEFENSE INFO. TECHNOLOGY CONTRAC!GS35F4997G !C!N! !N!HC101306F2065!P00004!20060406!20060930!004853412!004853412!004853412!N!JACOB & SUNDSTROM INC !401 E PRATT ST STE 2214 !BALTIMORE !MD!21202!03000!013!51!ARLINGTON !ARLINGTON !VIRGINIA !+000001363964!N!N!000000000000!D399!OTHER ADP & TELECOMMUNICATION SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !NOT DISCERNABLE !541519!A!A!6! ! !D! ! !999

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ICF JACOB & SUNDSTROM, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Information Systems Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $11.5 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2005-10-21. End: 2010-09-17.

What specific IT services were procured under 'Other ADP & Telecommunication Services' and how do they align with current defense needs?

The 'Other ADP & Telecommunication Services' category is broad. To assess value, a detailed breakdown of services like network management, telecommunications support, or specialized software development is needed. Understanding how these services directly support current defense missions is crucial for determining their effectiveness and necessity beyond the initial procurement rationale.

Given the 5-year performance period, what mechanisms were in place to mitigate the risk of technology obsolescence and cost overruns?

Contracts with long durations require proactive management. Mitigation strategies could include phased technology refreshes, clear performance metrics tied to evolving requirements, and robust change order controls. Regular reviews by the contracting officer and technical monitors are essential to ensure the services remain relevant and cost-effective throughout the contract's life.

How does the $11.5 million award compare to similar IT service contracts awarded by the DoD during that period?

Benchmarking this $11.5 million award requires comparing it against similar 'Other ADP & Telecommunication Services' contracts awarded by the DoD between 2005 and 2010. Factors like contract type (e.g., fixed-price vs. cost-plus), specific services rendered, and the size/complexity of the requiring agency would be critical for a fair comparison to assess if the pricing was competitive.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Custom Computer Programming Services

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS › ADP AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COMBINATION (APPLIES TO AWARDS WHERE TWO OR MORE OF THE ABOVE APPLY) (2)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: ICF International, Inc.

Address: 401 E PRATT ST STE 2214, BALTIMORE, MD, 21202

Business Categories: Category Business, Small Business

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS35F4997G

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline