GSA's $15.8M HSPD-12 Integration Contract Awarded to ICF Jacob & Sundstrom, Inc. for Physical Access Automation
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $15,794,736 ($15.8M)
Contractor: ICF Jacob & Sundstrom, Inc.
Awarding Agency: General Services Administration
Start Date: 2007-01-30
End Date: 2011-01-31
Contract Duration: 1,462 days
Daily Burn Rate: $10.8K/day
Competition Type: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER
Number of Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS
Sector: IT
Official Description: HSPD-12 INTEGRATION AND PHYSICAL BUILDING ACCESS AUTOMATION
Place of Performance
Location: BALTIMORE, BALTIMORE CITY County, MARYLAND, 21235
State: Maryland Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
General Services Administration obligated $15.8 million to ICF JACOB & SUNDSTROM, INC. for work described as: HSPD-12 INTEGRATION AND PHYSICAL BUILDING ACCESS AUTOMATION Key points: 1. Contract focused on integrating HSPD-12 requirements and automating physical building access. 2. Awarded via a competitive delivery order, indicating multiple bids were considered. 3. Duration of 1462 days suggests a substantial, long-term project. 4. Primary service category is Custom Computer Programming Services. 5. Contract value of $15.8 million over its lifecycle. 6. Performance period spanned from January 2007 to January 2011.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $15.8 million over approximately four years for a complex IT integration project appears reasonable. Benchmarking against similar large-scale IT service contracts for government-wide initiatives like HSPD-12 integration is challenging due to unique scope. However, the competitive nature of the award suggests pricing was vetted against market alternatives. The use of labor hours indicates flexibility in resource allocation, which can be cost-effective if managed efficiently.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: unknown
This contract was awarded as a competitive delivery order, implying that it was competed among multiple vendors. While the specific number of bidders is not detailed, the 'competitive' designation suggests that GSA sought proposals and evaluated them based on predefined criteria. This process is designed to foster price discovery and ensure the government receives the best value.
Taxpayer Impact: A competitive award process generally benefits taxpayers by driving down costs through market forces and encouraging innovation among potential contractors.
Public Impact
Federal agencies benefit from enhanced physical security and streamlined identity management through HSPD-12 compliance. The contract delivered IT services for the integration and automation of building access systems. Impacted federal facilities nationwide requiring standardized identity credentialing and access control. Supported the federal workforce by providing secure and efficient access to government buildings. Contributed to national security by strengthening physical security measures across federal infrastructure.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for scope creep in large IT integration projects if not managed tightly.
- Reliance on a single contractor for critical security infrastructure integration could pose a risk if performance falters.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through a competitive process, suggesting a vetted and capable contractor.
- Long contract duration indicates successful performance and continued need for services.
- Focus on a critical government mandate (HSPD-12) highlights alignment with national security objectives.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the IT services sector, specifically custom computer programming and system integration. The market for government IT services is substantial, with agencies constantly seeking solutions for identity management, cybersecurity, and infrastructure modernization. HSPD-12 compliance represented a significant undertaking across the federal government, driving demand for specialized integration and automation services. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically involve other large-scale IT system integration contracts for identity and access management solutions.
Small Business Impact
The provided data does not indicate if this contract involved small business set-asides or subcontracting opportunities. However, given the nature of large-scale IT integration projects, prime contractors often utilize a network of subcontractors, which can include small businesses. Further analysis would be needed to determine the extent of small business participation.
Oversight & Accountability
As a General Services Administration (GSA) contract, it would be subject to GSA's internal oversight mechanisms and potentially the GSA Office of Inspector General (OIG) for audits and investigations. The competitive award process itself is a form of oversight, ensuring adherence to procurement regulations. Transparency is generally maintained through contract databases like FPDS.
Related Government Programs
- Homeland Security Presidential Directive 12 (HSPD-12)
- Federal Identity, Credential, and Access Management (FICAM)
- IT System Integration Services
- Physical Security Systems
- Government IT Modernization Programs
Risk Flags
- Potential for integration complexity
- Cybersecurity risks in identity management systems
- Long-term sustainment and upgrade needs
Tags
it-services, custom-computer-programming, general-services-administration, competitive-delivery-order, large-contract, hspd-12, physical-access-control, identity-management, maryland, federal-contract, it-integration, automation
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
General Services Administration awarded $15.8 million to ICF JACOB & SUNDSTROM, INC.. HSPD-12 INTEGRATION AND PHYSICAL BUILDING ACCESS AUTOMATION
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is ICF JACOB & SUNDSTROM, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $15.8 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2007-01-30. End: 2011-01-31.
What was the specific technical scope of the HSPD-12 integration and physical building access automation?
The contract aimed to integrate systems to comply with Homeland Security Presidential Directive 12 (HSPD-12), which mandates a common identification standard for Federal employees and contractors. This involved developing and implementing solutions for physical building access control, ensuring that only authorized personnel with compliant credentials could enter federal facilities. The automation aspect likely focused on streamlining the process of issuing, managing, and revoking access credentials, as well as integrating these systems with existing IT infrastructure for enhanced security and efficiency. The 'Custom Computer Programming Services' NAICS code suggests significant software development and system integration work was performed.
How did the performance of ICF Jacob & Sundstrom, Inc. on this contract compare to industry standards for similar IT integration projects?
Detailed performance metrics for ICF Jacob & Sundstrom, Inc. on this specific contract are not publicly available in the provided data. However, the contract's successful completion and duration (2007-2011) suggest satisfactory performance. To compare against industry standards, one would typically look at metrics such as on-time delivery, adherence to budget, system uptime, security compliance rates, and user satisfaction. Without specific performance reports or contract close-out documentation, a direct comparison is difficult. Generally, large-scale IT integration projects face challenges like scope creep and integration complexities, making consistent on-time and on-budget delivery a benchmark of success.
What were the primary risks associated with this contract, and how were they mitigated?
Primary risks for this contract likely included technical integration challenges between disparate systems, cybersecurity vulnerabilities during the integration process, potential delays due to evolving HSPD-12 requirements, and contractor performance issues. Mitigation strategies would typically involve rigorous testing and validation protocols, robust cybersecurity measures throughout development and deployment, clear communication channels with the government client for requirement clarification, and strong contract management by GSA to monitor progress and address any performance deficiencies promptly. The competitive nature of the award also served as a risk mitigation factor, selecting a vendor presumed to have the capability to manage these risks.
How did the total contract value of $15.8 million align with the expected outcomes and benefits of HSPD-12 implementation?
The $15.8 million contract value represents a significant investment towards achieving the goals of HSPD-12, which include enhancing national security, improving operational efficiency, and streamlining identity management across the federal government. The value appears reasonable for a four-year project involving custom software development, system integration, and nationwide deployment of physical access automation for federal facilities. The benefits, such as improved security posture, reduced risk of unauthorized access, and a standardized approach to identity verification, are substantial and long-term, justifying the expenditure. Quantifying the exact ROI can be complex, but the cost is likely commensurate with the security and operational improvements delivered.
What is the historical spending pattern for HSPD-12 integration and physical access automation services by the GSA or other federal agencies?
HSPD-12 implementation represented a government-wide mandate, leading to substantial spending across numerous agencies from the mid-2000s onwards. GSA, as a central procurement and facilities management agency, played a key role in facilitating these implementations. Historical spending patterns show a peak in investment during the initial rollout and integration phases (roughly 2005-2012), followed by ongoing maintenance, upgrades, and sustainment costs. Agencies like the Department of Defense, Department of Homeland Security, and others with large physical footprints and workforces would have incurred significant costs. This $15.8 million award to ICF Jacob & Sundstrom, Inc. is one data point within a much larger federal investment in HSPD-12 compliance.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Custom Computer Programming Services
Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS › ADP AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: COMPETITIVE DELIVERY ORDER
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: R3073226
Offers Received: 3
Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS (Z)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: ICF International, Inc. (UEI: 139001544)
Address: 401 E PRATT ST STE 2214, BALTIMORE, MD, 21202
Business Categories: Category Business, Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $22,402,409
Exercised Options: $15,794,736
Current Obligation: $15,794,736
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: GS35F4997G
IDV Type: FSS
Timeline
Start Date: 2007-01-30
Current End Date: 2011-01-31
Potential End Date: 2011-01-31 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2021-12-05
More Contracts from ICF Jacob & Sundstrom, Inc.
- Support Services — $51.5M (Department of Defense)
- Cyber Network Defense Services (cnds)/Agent for Certification(aca)/Information Assurance Manager(iam) Support Services — $23.6M (Department of Defense)
- Contractor Support for the Various System Administration and Support Services Required to Operate the Defense Security Service (DSS) Owned Enterprise Systems and Associated Infrastructure — $19.1M (Department of Defense)
- Hspd 12 Support Services — $16.8M (Environmental Protection Agency)
- 200607!602590!9700!hc1013!defense Info. Technology Contrac!gs35f4997g !C!N! !n!hc101306f2065!p00004!20060406!20060930!004853412!004853412!004853412!n!jacob & Sundstrom Inc !401 E Pratt ST STE 2214 !baltimore !md!21202!03000!013!51!arlington !arlington !virginia !+000001363964!n!n!000000000000!d399!other ADP & Telecommunication Services !S1 !services !000 !NOT Discernable !541519!A!A!6! ! !D! ! !99990909!B!E!Y! ! !A! ! ! !000! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !B!N! ! ! ! ! ! ! !000! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! ! — $11.5M (Department of Defense)
Other General Services Administration Contracts
- Software Life Cycle Development — $1.4B (Science Applications International Corporation)
- Task Order (TO) 47qfca21f0018 IS Hereby Awarded to Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc. (BAH) to Provide Enterprise Level Data to the Ousd(c), and ITS Strategic Partners (I.E., DOD Fourth Estate, DOD Departments, and IC Community) — $1.4B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)
- Federal Contract — $1.2B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)
- THE Scope of the to IS to Provide Enterprise IT Services for the Usace — $1.1B (Science Applications International Corporation)
- Task Order Award — $1.1B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)