DoD Awards $869M Engineering Services Contract to Professional Analysis Inc. for Technical Support
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $12,519,990 ($12.5M)
Contractor: Professional Analysis, Incorporated
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2005-12-15
End Date: 2012-11-14
Contract Duration: 2,526 days
Daily Burn Rate: $5.0K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 21
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Sector: Other
Official Description: 200603!060620!1700!N00025!NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COM!N0017804D4106 !A!N! !Y!EJ01 ! !20051215!20061114!869206128!869206128!869206128!N!PROFESSIONAL ANALYSIS INC !3703 MOUNT AIREY LN !ANNANDALE !VA!22003!50000!001!11!WASHINGTON !DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA !D.C. !+000001865469!N!N!000000000000!R425!ENGINEERING TECHNICAL SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !NOT DISCERNABLE !541330!E! !5!B!M! !A!D!20090331!B! ! !A! !A!N!U!2!021!B! !Z!N!Z! ! !N!B!N!N! !B!B! !A!A!000!A!B!N! ! ! ! !1700!N00024!0001! !
Place of Performance
Location: WASHINGTON NAVY YARD, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20376
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $12.5 million to PROFESSIONAL ANALYSIS, INCORPORATED for work described as: 200603!060620!1700!N00025!NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COM!N0017804D4106 !A!N! !Y!EJ01 ! !20051215!20061114!869206128!869206128!869206128!N!PROFESSIONAL ANALYSIS INC !3703 MOUNT AIREY LN !ANNANDALE !VA!22003!50000!001!11!WASHINGTON !DIST… Key points: 1. The contract, valued at $869,206,128, was awarded to Professional Analysis, Inc. for engineering technical services. 2. This award represents a significant expenditure within the engineering services sector, specifically for the Department of the Navy. 3. The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 4. The primary risk appears to be the reliance on a single vendor for a substantial period, potentially impacting long-term cost-effectiveness.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract's total value of $869,206,128 over its duration suggests a substantial investment. Benchmarking against similar large-scale engineering services contracts would be necessary for a precise pricing assessment.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
Awarded under full and open competition, this method typically allows for the widest range of potential bidders, fostering price discovery and potentially leading to more competitive pricing.
Taxpayer Impact: The competitive nature of the award is intended to ensure taxpayer funds are used efficiently for essential engineering and technical services.
Public Impact
Supports critical naval facilities engineering and technical services, ensuring operational readiness. The large contract value indicates significant government reliance on the contractor's expertise. Potential for follow-on work or expansion of services based on performance. Impacts the engineering services market by consolidating a large portion of work with one firm.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Long contract duration (over 8 years) may lead to vendor lock-in.
- Cost-plus fixed fee contract type can incentivize cost overruns if not closely monitored.
- Lack of specific performance metrics in the provided data makes assessing effectiveness challenging.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a robust market.
- Contractor has a history with the government, suggesting familiarity with requirements.
- Significant value suggests the contractor possesses the capacity and expertise for large-scale projects.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector (NAICS 541330). Spending in this sector is crucial for government infrastructure, defense, and research. Benchmarks for similar large-scale, long-term engineering support contracts would typically be in the hundreds of millions to billions of dollars.
Small Business Impact
The data does not indicate any specific set-asides for small businesses. This large contract awarded to a single entity may limit opportunities for small businesses to participate directly, though they could potentially be subcontractors.
Oversight & Accountability
The contract's duration and value necessitate robust oversight from the Department of the Navy to ensure performance, cost control, and adherence to contract terms. Regular performance reviews and audits are critical.
Related Government Programs
- Engineering Services
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Navy Programs
Risk Flags
- Long contract duration increases risk of vendor lock-in and potential for price increases.
- Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract type can lead to cost overruns if not managed tightly.
- Lack of specific performance metrics in the provided data makes assessing contractor effectiveness difficult.
- Potential for scope creep over the contract's extended period.
- Reliance on a single contractor for critical services may pose a risk if the contractor faces financial or operational difficulties.
Tags
engineering-services, department-of-defense, dc, delivery-order, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $12.5 million to PROFESSIONAL ANALYSIS, INCORPORATED. 200603!060620!1700!N00025!NAVAL FACILITIES ENGINEERING COM!N0017804D4106 !A!N! !Y!EJ01 ! !20051215!20061114!869206128!869206128!869206128!N!PROFESSIONAL ANALYSIS INC !3703 MOUNT AIREY LN !ANNANDALE !VA!22003!50000!001!11!WASHINGTON !DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA !D.C. !+000001865469!N!N!000000000000!R425!ENGINEERING TECHNICAL SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !NOT DISCERNABLE !541330!E! !5!B!M! !A!D!200
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is PROFESSIONAL ANALYSIS, INCORPORATED.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $12.5 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2005-12-15. End: 2012-11-14.
What specific engineering technical services are being provided under this contract, and how do they align with current naval operational needs?
The contract specifies 'ENGINEERING TECHNICAL SERVICES' (PSC R425). While the exact scope isn't detailed, it likely encompasses design, analysis, testing, and support for naval facilities and systems. Alignment with current needs would depend on specific naval modernization, maintenance, or new construction projects requiring specialized engineering expertise.
Given the Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) structure, what mechanisms are in place to prevent cost overruns and ensure value for money?
CPFF contracts require stringent government oversight to manage costs. Mechanisms typically include detailed cost tracking, regular audits, negotiation of fee based on performance, and clear definition of allowable costs. The government must actively monitor expenditures and contractor performance to ensure the fixed fee remains justified and costs are controlled.
How will the effectiveness of Professional Analysis, Inc.'s services be measured over the contract's extended duration to ensure continued value?
Effectiveness is typically measured through performance metrics defined in the contract, such as on-time delivery, quality of work, adherence to budget, and customer satisfaction. For a long-term contract, periodic reviews and potential contract modifications based on evolving requirements and performance assessments are crucial to ensure sustained value and alignment with DoD objectives.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services
Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Offers Received: 21
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 2121 EISENHOWER AVE STE 606, ALEXANDRIA, VA, 22314
Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: N0017804D4106
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2005-12-15
Current End Date: 2012-11-14
Potential End Date: 2012-11-14 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2019-04-08
More Contracts from Professional Analysis, Incorporated
- N102D / N4 / J. VAN Natta - Material Management Ashore — $25.3M (Department of Defense)
- Amendment Incorporates Changes to Document AS Follows: A) Changes Required by Questions and Answers; B) Changes to Base Year Clins for Period of Performance; C) Adds Quantity, Unit of Issue, and Language to Extended Description for Clin 3200; and Changes Sections F, L, and M — $17.7M (Department of Defense)
- This IS a Non-Personal Services Contract to Provide Integrated Logistics Support Services (ilss) for Marine Force Storage Command (mfsc), 2ND FSB, Albany, GA — $13.2M (Department of Defense)
- Coordinated Secondary Reparables (secrep) Management and Strategic Logistics Services (csm&sls) — $13.0M (Department of Defense)
- Support in the Execution of the Material and Asset Management Programs Including Operating Materials&supplies, Purchase Requisition, and Asset / Plant Property&equipment — $12.4M (Department of Defense)
View all Professional Analysis, Incorporated federal contracts →
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)