DOT awards $221K for Salt Lake City airport grounds maintenance to X-Clean Corp

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $220,857 ($220.9K)

Contractor: X-Clean Corp

Awarding Agency: Department of Transportation

Start Date: 2023-04-18

End Date: 2026-10-31

Contract Duration: 1,292 days

Daily Burn Rate: $171/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 12

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: FY23 LANDSCAPE AND GROUNDS MAINTENANCE AT THE SALT LAKE CITY ATCT AND ARTCC

Place of Performance

Location: SALT LAKE CITY, SALT LAKE County, UTAH, 84116

State: Utah Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Transportation obligated $220,857.41 to X-CLEAN CORP for work described as: FY23 LANDSCAPE AND GROUNDS MAINTENANCE AT THE SALT LAKE CITY ATCT AND ARTCC Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable for landscaping services at a major federal facility. 2. Full and open competition was utilized, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. The contract duration extends over three years, indicating a need for sustained services. 4. Fixed-price contract type helps manage cost certainty for the government. 5. The award was made to a single contractor, X-Clean Corp. 6. Services are categorized under Landscaping Services (NAICS 561730).

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of approximately $221,000 over three years for landscaping services at the Salt Lake City ATCT and ARTCC appears to be within a reasonable range for such facilities. Benchmarking against similar contracts for grounds maintenance at federal air traffic control facilities would provide a more precise assessment, but the scale of the award does not immediately suggest overpricing. The firm fixed-price structure offers cost predictability.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES'. This indicates that while the competition was intended to be open, certain sources may have been excluded prior to the solicitation, or the competition was limited in some manner. Further details on the exclusion criteria would be needed to fully assess the competitive landscape. The number of offers received (12) suggests significant interest, which is a positive sign for price discovery.

Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition, even with exclusions, generally benefits taxpayers by encouraging multiple bids and driving down prices. The 12 offers received suggest a healthy level of competition, which should lead to a fair market price.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) and the public, who rely on the safe and efficient operation of air traffic control facilities. The contract ensures the maintenance of grounds and landscaping at the Salt Lake City Air Traffic Control Tower (ATCT) and Air Route Traffic Control Center (ARTCC). This service contributes to the operational readiness and aesthetic upkeep of critical national infrastructure. The geographic impact is localized to the Salt Lake City, Utah area, supporting the specific facilities managed by the FAA.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

The specific reasons for 'EXCLUSION OF SOURCES' in a 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION' are not detailed, which could obscure potential competitive disadvantages.
The contract duration of over three years might limit opportunities for new or smaller businesses to enter the market for these services.

Positive Signals

The award utilized a 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION' approach, indicating an effort to solicit from a broad range of potential contractors.
Receiving 12 offers suggests strong market interest and a competitive environment for this type of service.
The firm fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty for the government, mitigating risks associated with fluctuating service costs.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the broader facilities support services sector, specifically focusing on grounds maintenance and landscaping. The market for such services is generally competitive, with numerous small and large businesses offering specialized expertise. Federal contracts for landscaping often involve maintaining large areas around government buildings, airports, and military installations, requiring adherence to specific environmental and safety standards. The value of this contract is relatively small within the overall federal spending landscape for facilities management.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). While the competition was 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES', the absence of a small business set-aside means that large businesses were eligible to compete and potentially win. There is no explicit information on subcontracting requirements for small businesses within this award, which could represent missed opportunities for the small business ecosystem.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA), a division of the Department of Transportation. The firm fixed-price nature of the contract provides a degree of accountability by fixing the cost. Transparency is facilitated by the public nature of contract awards, though specific performance metrics and oversight reports are not detailed here. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

Federal Aviation Administration Facilities Maintenance
Department of Transportation Groundskeeping Contracts
Airport Infrastructure Support Services
General Services Administration (GSA) Schedules for Landscaping

Risk Flags

Potential for reduced competition due to 'EXCLUSION OF SOURCES'.
Risk of service quality decline over a multi-year fixed-price contract.
Lack of specific performance metrics in summary data.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Transportation awarded $220,857.41 to X-CLEAN CORP. FY23 LANDSCAPE AND GROUNDS MAINTENANCE AT THE SALT LAKE CITY ATCT AND ARTCC

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is X-CLEAN CORP.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Transportation (Federal Aviation Administration).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $220,857.41.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2023-04-18. End: 2026-10-31.

What is the track record of X-Clean Corp. in performing federal contracts, particularly for landscaping and grounds maintenance?

Information regarding X-Clean Corp.'s specific track record with federal contracts is not provided in the data. A comprehensive assessment would require reviewing past performance evaluations, contract history, and any reported issues or successes on similar federal awards. Without this data, it is difficult to gauge their experience level and reliability for this specific landscaping and grounds maintenance task at the Salt Lake City ATCT and ARTCC. Further research into federal procurement databases like SAM.gov or FPDS would be necessary to build a complete picture of their performance history and suitability for this role.

How does the awarded price compare to similar landscaping contracts at other FAA facilities or federal air traffic control centers?

The provided data indicates a contract value of approximately $220,857.41 over a period of roughly 3.25 years (April 2023 to October 2026). To benchmark this value, one would need to compare it against contracts for similar landscaping and grounds maintenance services at other FAA facilities or comparable federal air traffic control centers. Factors such as facility size, scope of services (e.g., mowing, tree trimming, snow removal), geographic location (affecting labor and material costs), and contract duration would need to be considered for an accurate comparison. Without access to a database of comparable federal contract pricing, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging, though the total amount does not appear excessively high for a multi-year federal contract.

What are the specific risks associated with a multi-year firm fixed-price contract for landscaping services?

A primary risk with a multi-year firm fixed-price contract for landscaping is potential cost escalation for the contractor if material or labor costs increase significantly over the contract term, potentially leading to reduced service quality or contractor default if the price becomes unsustainable. Conversely, if costs decrease, the contractor may realize higher-than-expected profits. For the government, the risk lies in potentially paying a premium upfront to lock in the price, which might be higher than if the contract were re-competed annually. Ensuring clear performance standards and robust oversight is crucial to mitigate risks related to service quality degradation over the contract's extended duration.

What is the expected effectiveness of X-Clean Corp. in maintaining the grounds of the Salt Lake City ATCT and ARTCC based on the contract terms?

The effectiveness of X-Clean Corp. in maintaining the grounds of the Salt Lake City ATCT and ARTCC will depend on the specific performance standards and deliverables outlined in the contract, which are not detailed in the provided summary. The firm fixed-price nature suggests a focus on achieving defined outcomes within the agreed budget. Success will be measured by the contractor's ability to meet these standards consistently throughout the contract period, ensuring the facilities are well-kept, safe, and compliant with any environmental regulations. The FAA's contract administration and quality assurance processes will be critical in monitoring and ensuring the contractor's effectiveness.

How has federal spending on landscaping and grounds maintenance services evolved over the past five fiscal years, and where does this contract fit in?

Analyzing federal spending trends on landscaping and grounds maintenance requires access to historical procurement data across various agencies. Generally, spending in this category can fluctuate based on infrastructure needs, agency budgets, and the number of federal facilities requiring upkeep. This specific contract, valued at approximately $221,000 over three years, represents a relatively small portion of the overall federal expenditure on such services. It is likely indicative of routine maintenance needs at a specific FAA installation rather than a large-scale infrastructure project or a significant shift in federal spending priorities for groundskeeping.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Services to Buildings and Dwellings › Landscaping Services

Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › HOUSEKEEPING SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: 697DCK-23-R-00125

Offers Received: 12

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 12812 SW 259TH ST, HOMESTEAD, FL, 33032

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, DoT Certified Disadvantaged Business Enterprise, Hispanic American Owned Business, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $220,857

Exercised Options: $220,857

Current Obligation: $220,857

Actual Outlays: $182,357

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline