DOT awards $28M engineering support contract to ASRC Federal Advanced Research, LLC for FAA

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $28,000 ($28.0K)

Contractor: Asrc Federal Advanced Research, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Transportation

Start Date: 2026-04-02

End Date: 2027-03-18

Contract Duration: 350 days

Daily Burn Rate: $80/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: SECOND LEVEL ENGINEERING SUPPORT SERVICES FOR AJW-111/161

Place of Performance

Location: OKLAHOMA CITY, OKLAHOMA County, OKLAHOMA, 73169

State: Oklahoma Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Transportation obligated $28,000 to ASRC FEDERAL ADVANCED RESEARCH, LLC for work described as: SECOND LEVEL ENGINEERING SUPPORT SERVICES FOR AJW-111/161 Key points: 1. Contract value of $28 million over its period of performance. 2. Competition was full and open after exclusion of sources, indicating a broad search for qualified bidders. 3. The contract is a delivery order under a larger indefinite-delivery/indefinite-quantity (IDIQ) vehicle. 4. Services are for second-level engineering support for specific FAA programs (AJW-111/161). 5. The contract duration is approximately 350 days. 6. The contractor, ASRC Federal Advanced Research, LLC, is a known entity in the federal contracting space.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $28 million for approximately one year of engineering support appears reasonable given the specialized nature of the services. Benchmarking against similar engineering support contracts within the FAA or other transportation-related agencies would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. However, the firm fixed-price structure suggests that the contractor bears the risk of cost overruns, which is generally favorable for the government.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources.' This suggests that while the competition was intended to be broad, specific sources may have been excluded based on pre-qualification or other criteria. The number of bidders is not specified, but the 'full and open' designation implies a competitive process was undertaken.

Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition generally leads to better price discovery and potentially lower costs for taxpayers compared to sole-source or limited competition awards.

Public Impact

Benefits the Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) by providing essential engineering support for critical programs. Ensures continued operational support and technical expertise for FAA initiatives. The services are likely to be performed remotely or at FAA facilities, with potential impacts on the local workforce in Oklahoma where the contractor may be based. Supports the safety and efficiency of the National Airspace System through specialized engineering services.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep if the definition of 'second level engineering support' is not clearly delineated.
Dependence on a single contractor for critical support services could pose a risk if performance issues arise.

Positive Signals

Firm fixed-price contract structure incentivizes cost control by the contractor.
The contractor has experience in advanced research and federal contracting.
Full and open competition, even with exclusions, suggests a robust selection process.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector, a critical component of the broader professional, scientific, and technical services market. The federal government is a significant consumer of these services, particularly within agencies like the FAA that require specialized technical expertise for complex systems. Spending in this sector often supports infrastructure, research, and operational maintenance.

Small Business Impact

The provided data does not indicate any small business set-aside or subcontracting requirements for this contract. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem is likely minimal unless the prime contractor voluntarily engages small businesses in its subcontracting efforts.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight will likely be managed by the contracting officer and program managers within the FAA. The firm fixed-price nature of the contract provides a degree of financial oversight. Transparency is facilitated by federal contract databases, though detailed performance metrics may not be publicly available. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

FAA Engineering Services Contracts
AJW Program Support
Federal Aviation Administration IT and Engineering Support
Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services

Risk Flags

Potential for performance issues
Scope definition clarity
Contractor dependency

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Transportation awarded $28,000 to ASRC FEDERAL ADVANCED RESEARCH, LLC. SECOND LEVEL ENGINEERING SUPPORT SERVICES FOR AJW-111/161

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ASRC FEDERAL ADVANCED RESEARCH, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Transportation (Federal Aviation Administration).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $28,000.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-02. End: 2027-03-18.

What is the historical performance record of ASRC Federal Advanced Research, LLC with the FAA and other federal agencies?

ASRC Federal Advanced Research, LLC has a history of performing contracts for various federal agencies, including the Department of Defense and NASA, in areas related to research, engineering, and technical services. Their performance with the FAA would need to be reviewed through contract databases like the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS) or the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) to ascertain specific past performance ratings and any notable issues. Generally, companies that secure recurring contracts with agencies like the FAA demonstrate a baseline level of capability and reliability, but a detailed review of past performance on similar contracts is crucial for assessing risk on this specific award.

How does the $28 million contract value compare to similar engineering support services procured by the FAA?

Comparing the $28 million contract value requires identifying comparable contracts for 'second level engineering support' within the FAA or similar agencies. Factors such as the scope of work, duration, required expertise, and the specific programs supported (AJW-111/161) are critical for a fair comparison. Without access to detailed historical procurement data for similar services, it's challenging to definitively benchmark this value. However, given the specialized nature of aviation engineering and the approximately one-year duration, $28 million suggests a significant level of support is being procured, which appears within a reasonable range for complex federal engineering tasks.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they mitigated?

Primary risks include potential performance deficiencies by the contractor, scope creep beyond the defined 'second level engineering support,' and potential cost overruns if the firm fixed-price structure is not managed effectively. Mitigation strategies include robust contract oversight by the FAA, clear definition and management of the Statement of Work (SOW), regular performance reviews, and the contractor's own internal quality control processes. The firm fixed-price nature inherently shifts cost risk to the contractor, incentivizing efficient performance. The contractor's track record and the competitive nature of the award also serve as risk mitigation factors.

What is the expected effectiveness of these engineering services in supporting the specified FAA programs?

The effectiveness of these engineering services hinges on the contractor's ability to provide timely, accurate, and relevant technical support to the AJW-111/161 programs. As 'second level' support, these services likely involve in-depth analysis, troubleshooting, design modifications, and technical guidance that goes beyond basic operational support. Successful delivery should enhance the reliability, safety, and efficiency of the systems managed by these FAA programs. The FAA's program managers will be responsible for monitoring performance against defined objectives and ensuring the services contribute positively to the overall mission goals of the agency.

What are the historical spending patterns for engineering support services by the FAA in recent years?

The FAA consistently spends significant amounts on engineering and technical support services to maintain and modernize the National Airspace System. Historical spending patterns reveal a substantial and ongoing investment in areas such as systems engineering, software development, air traffic control technology, and aircraft certification support. This $28 million contract aligns with the agency's typical procurement profile for specialized technical expertise. Analyzing FAA's overall budget for engineering services over the past 5-10 years would show a trend of sustained investment, often through a mix of large IDIQ vehicles and specific task orders like this one.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services

Product/Service Code: MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD EQUIPMENT › MAINT, REPAIR, REBUILD OF EQUIPMENT

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 7000 MUIRKIRK MEADOWS DR STE 100, BELTSVILLE, MD, 20705

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Alaskan Native Corporation Owned Firm, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $279,156

Exercised Options: $198,900

Current Obligation: $28,000

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 6973GH26D00022

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline