GSA awards $7,170 mat contract to F & M Micro Products Inc. under SAP

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $7,170 ($7.2K)

Contractor: F & M Micro Products Inc

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2026-04-03

End Date: 2026-06-17

Contract Duration: 75 days

Daily Burn Rate: $96/day

Competition Type: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: MAT,GYMNASIUMOLDING MAT(ACCORDION TYPE) 14 OZ/SQ YD MINIMUM; VINYL COVERED POLYURETHANE; FOAM FILLING; 4'WX6'LX2''D; VELCRO TAPE ON4'END'END'END'END

Place of Performance

Location: VAN NUYS, LOS ANGELES County, CALIFORNIA, 91406

State: California Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $7,169.5 to F & M MICRO PRODUCTS INC for work described as: MAT,GYMNASIUMOLDING MAT(ACCORDION TYPE) 14 OZ/SQ YD MINIMUM; VINYL COVERED POLYURETHANE; FOAM FILLING; 4'WX6'LX2''D; VELCRO TAPE ON4'END'END'END'END Key points: 1. Value for money appears fair given the unit specifications and fixed-price nature. 2. Competition dynamics indicate a streamlined process under Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP). 3. Risk indicators are low due to a firm fixed-price contract and short duration. 4. Performance context is a standard supply of gymnasium mats. 5. Sector positioning is within the broader 'Other' manufacturing category, specifically polystyrene foam products.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $7,169.50 for 3 mats, averaging approximately $2,390 per mat, seems within a reasonable range for specialized gymnasium equipment of this size and material specification. Without direct market comparables for this exact product, a precise benchmark is difficult, but the price appears to align with typical costs for custom-manufactured foam products of this nature. The firm fixed-price structure limits cost escalation risk for the government.

Cost Per Unit: Approximately $2,390 per mat (4'x6'x2' with specific material and velcro features).

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The contract was competed under Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP), which typically involves a less formal solicitation process than full and open competition. While the specific number of bidders is not provided, SAP generally allows for a limited number of quotes to be solicited, often from pre-approved vendors or through online portals. This approach aims for efficiency for smaller dollar value procurements.

Taxpayer Impact: The limited competition under SAP may result in slightly higher prices than a full and open competition, but it ensures a timely and cost-effective acquisition for the government on this smaller value contract.

Public Impact

The General Services Administration (GSA) benefits by acquiring necessary equipment for federal facilities. Gymnasium mats are delivered, supporting recreational and training activities within federal installations. The geographic impact is localized to California, where the mats will be deployed. Workforce implications are minimal, primarily related to the manufacturing and delivery of the mats.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of detailed competition data for SAP procurements can obscure true market price.
Potential for vendor lock-in if SAP processes consistently favor incumbent or easily accessible vendors.

Positive Signals

Firm fixed-price contract provides cost certainty.
Short contract duration minimizes long-term financial commitment and performance risk.
Use of SAP suggests an efficient procurement process for a relatively low-value item.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under the manufacturing sector, specifically the production of polystyrene foam products (NAICS 326140). The market for specialized gymnasium equipment is niche, often involving custom fabrication. Comparable spending benchmarks are difficult to establish without more specific product details and market analysis, but GSA's role is to facilitate efficient procurement of such goods for federal agencies.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). While F & M Micro Products Inc. may be a small business, the procurement itself did not have a specific small business set-aside designation. This means subcontracting opportunities for small businesses are not mandated by this specific award, though the prime contractor may engage them voluntarily.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract is managed by the General Services Administration (GSA) through its Federal Acquisition Service. As a purchase order under SAP, it is subject to standard procurement regulations and internal GSA oversight. Transparency is provided through contract award databases, and accountability rests with the contracting officer and the vendor to meet the terms of the firm fixed-price agreement.

Related Government Programs

General Services Administration (GSA) Supply Schedules
Federal Acquisition Service (FAS) Contracts
Gymnasium Equipment Procurement
Polystyrene Foam Product Manufacturing

Risk Flags

Limited competition data available for SAP procurements.
Potential for price variance due to streamlined acquisition process.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $7,169.5 to F & M MICRO PRODUCTS INC. MAT,GYMNASIUMOLDING MAT(ACCORDION TYPE) 14 OZ/SQ YD MINIMUM; VINYL COVERED POLYURETHANE; FOAM FILLING; 4'WX6'LX2''D; VELCRO TAPE ON4'END'END'END'END

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is F & M MICRO PRODUCTS INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $7,169.5.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-03. End: 2026-06-17.

What is the typical track record of F & M Micro Products Inc. with federal contracts?

Information regarding F & M Micro Products Inc.'s specific track record with federal contracts is not detailed in the provided data. A comprehensive analysis would require searching federal procurement databases (like SAM.gov or FPDS) for past awards, contract performance reviews, and any reported issues or successes. Without this historical data, it's difficult to assess their reliability and past performance in delivering similar goods or services to the government. Their current award is a purchase order, suggesting a transactional relationship rather than a long-term, large-scale contract.

How does the per-unit cost of these mats compare to similar government or commercial purchases?

The per-unit cost of approximately $2,390 per mat is based on a total award of $7,169.50 for three mats. This price point is for a specific configuration: 4'x6'x2' vinyl-covered polyurethane foam mats with velcro closures. Benchmarking this requires comparing it to similar government contracts or commercial catalog prices for mats with identical or very close specifications. Given the specialized nature and custom fabrication likely involved, direct comparisons might be challenging. However, for high-quality, durable gymnasium mats of this size, the price appears to be within a plausible range, though potentially on the higher side if simpler alternatives exist.

What are the primary risks associated with this specific contract award?

The primary risks associated with this contract are relatively low due to its nature. The firm fixed-price (FFP) contract type mitigates cost overrun risks for the government. The short duration (delivery expected between April 3, 2026, and June 17, 2026, for a 75-day period) limits the exposure to performance issues or market changes. Potential risks could include delivery delays, quality defects not meeting the '14 oz/sq yd minimum' specification, or the vendor going out of business, though these are standard risks for most supply contracts and are not significantly elevated here.

How effective is the Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP) process for procuring items like these gymnasium mats?

SAP is generally considered effective for procuring items like these gymnasium mats, especially when the total dollar value is below the SAP threshold (currently $250,000). Its effectiveness lies in its speed and reduced administrative burden compared to full and open competition. For a $7,170 purchase, SAP allows GSA to acquire the necessary equipment quickly and efficiently. The potential trade-off is that competition might be less robust, potentially leading to slightly higher prices than could be achieved through a broader solicitation. However, for low-value, routine items, the efficiency gains often outweigh the marginal price difference.

What is the historical spending pattern for similar gymnasium mats by the GSA or other federal agencies?

Historical spending patterns for similar gymnasium mats by GSA or other federal agencies are not provided in this data snippet. To analyze this, one would need to query federal procurement databases for contracts with similar Product Service Codes (PSCs) or NAICS codes, and keywords related to 'gymnasium mats,' 'landing mats,' or 'exercise mats.' Examining past awards would reveal the volume of such procurements, typical contract values, the agencies most frequently purchasing them, and the competitive landscape over time. This could help establish a more robust benchmark for the current award's value and identify any trends in pricing or vendor participation.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Manufacturing › Plastics Product Manufacturing › Polystyrene Foam Product Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: FOOD PREPARATION/SERVING EQPT

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 6917 WOODLEY AVE, VAN NUYS, CA, 91406

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $7,170

Exercised Options: $7,170

Current Obligation: $7,170

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Timeline