The Will-Burt Company awarded $14.9M contract for fabricated metal products, competed under SAP

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $14,943 ($14.9K)

Contractor: THE Will-Burt Company

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2026-04-03

End Date: 2026-05-12

Contract Duration: 39 days

Daily Burn Rate: $383/day

Competition Type: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: FILING CABINET

Place of Performance

Location: ORRVILLE, WAYNE County, OHIO, 44667

State: Ohio Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $14,942.64 to THE WILL-BURT COMPANY for work described as: FILING CABINET Key points: 1. Contract awarded to a single vendor, The Will-Burt Company, for miscellaneous fabricated metal products. 2. The contract type is Firm Fixed Price, indicating predictable costs for the government. 3. Competition was conducted under Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP), suggesting a focus on smaller value procurements. 4. The contract duration is 39 months, with an end date in April 2026. 5. The award was made by the General Services Administration (GSA), a common contracting agency. 6. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 332999 covers 'All Other Miscellaneous Fabricated Metal Product Manufacturing'.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $14.9 million over approximately 3 years for miscellaneous fabricated metal products appears to be within a reasonable range for such specialized manufacturing. However, without specific details on the exact nature of the 'fabricated metal products' and their intended use, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging. Benchmarking against similar GSA procurements for custom metal fabrication would provide a clearer picture of pricing efficiency. The firm fixed price structure offers cost certainty, which is a positive aspect for budget management.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was competed under Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP), which typically allows for a broader range of competition than micro-purchases but is less formal than full and open competition for larger contracts. The data indicates 3 bidders participated in this competition. While three bidders suggest some level of market engagement, the specific details of the solicitation and evaluation process under SAP would determine the true extent of competition and its impact on price discovery.

Taxpayer Impact: Competition among three bidders under SAP likely resulted in a reasonably competitive price for the government, avoiding the potential for higher costs associated with sole-source awards.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are likely government agencies requiring specialized fabricated metal products, potentially for infrastructure, equipment, or operational needs. The services delivered involve the manufacturing and supply of miscellaneous fabricated metal products. The geographic impact is centered in Ohio (ST: OH, SN: OHIO), where the contractor, The Will-Burt Company, is located. Workforce implications may include job creation or maintenance at The Will-Burt Company's facilities in Ohio.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

  • Limited public information on the specific 'miscellaneous fabricated metal products' makes it difficult to assess if the awarded items are standard or highly specialized, impacting potential for cost overruns.
  • The use of Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP) might limit the depth of competition compared to larger, more complex solicitations, potentially impacting optimal price discovery.
  • Lack of detailed performance metrics or past performance data in the provided summary makes it hard to gauge the contractor's historical reliability for this specific type of product.

Positive Signals

  • The contract is Firm Fixed Price, which provides cost certainty and protects the government from cost overruns.
  • The General Services Administration (GSA) is a reputable agency known for its procurement expertise, suggesting a well-managed process.
  • The competition involved three bidders, indicating that the market for these fabricated metal products is not entirely concentrated, and some level of price negotiation was likely achieved.

Sector Analysis

The contract falls within the 'Miscellaneous Fabricated Metal Product Manufacturing' sector, a broad category encompassing a wide array of metal goods. This sector is crucial for supporting various industries, including defense, construction, and general manufacturing. Spending in this area can fluctuate based on government infrastructure projects, equipment upgrades, and specific operational requirements. Benchmarking against similar GSA contracts for fabricated metal components or custom metalwork would be necessary for a precise comparison, but the $14.9 million award suggests a significant, though not massive, procurement.

Small Business Impact

The provided data indicates that small business participation was not a specific set-aside for this contract (SS: false, SB: false). Therefore, the primary impact on small businesses would be indirect, potentially through subcontracting opportunities if The Will-Burt Company chooses to engage them. Without explicit subcontracting plans or goals, it's difficult to quantify the direct benefit to the small business ecosystem from this particular award.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the purview of the General Services Administration (GSA), specifically the Federal Acquisition Service. As a competed contract under SAP, the oversight mechanisms would likely involve standard procurement regulations and contract administration procedures. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases like FPDS. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected during the contract's lifecycle.

Related Government Programs

  • GSA Federal Supply Schedule Contracts
  • Department of Defense Fabricated Metal Procurements
  • General Services Administration Building and Facilities Maintenance Contracts

Risk Flags

  • Potential for undefined scope due to 'miscellaneous' product classification.
  • Reliance on SAP for a contract value potentially exceeding standard thresholds may warrant further investigation into procurement procedures.
  • Limited public data on specific product requirements hinders detailed value analysis.

Tags

fabricated-metal-products, miscellaneous-manufacturing, firm-fixed-price, simplified-acquisition-procedures, general-services-administration, the-will-burt-company, ohio, federal-contract, defense-adjacent, infrastructure-support

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $14,942.64 to THE WILL-BURT COMPANY. FILING CABINET

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is THE WILL-BURT COMPANY.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $14,942.64.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-03. End: 2026-05-12.

What is the specific nature of the 'All Other Miscellaneous Fabricated Metal Products' being procured under this contract?

The provided data identifies the product category using NAICS code 332999, which covers 'All Other Miscellaneous Fabricated Metal Product Manufacturing.' This broad classification suggests the contract could encompass a wide range of items, from custom-designed metal components and enclosures to specialized hardware or structural elements. Without further details from the contract's statement of work or product descriptions, it is impossible to ascertain the exact nature of these fabricated metal products. Understanding the specificity is crucial for assessing the technical requirements, potential risks, and the appropriateness of the pricing and competition level.

How does the $14.9 million contract value compare to historical spending on similar fabricated metal products by the GSA or other federal agencies?

A direct comparison of the $14.9 million contract value to historical spending requires access to detailed procurement data beyond the summary provided. However, as a Firm Fixed Price contract awarded under Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP) with three bidders, it suggests a procurement of moderate value and scope. GSA often procures a wide variety of goods and services, and fabricated metal products can range from small, standardized items to large, custom-engineered solutions. To benchmark effectively, one would need to identify comparable contracts based on the specific type of fabricated metal products, the agency procuring them, and the contract duration. Without this granular data, it's challenging to definitively state if $14.9 million represents high, low, or average spending for this category.

What is The Will-Burt Company's track record with federal contracts, particularly for fabricated metal products?

The provided data identifies The Will-Burt Company as the awardee. To assess their track record, a review of their past federal contract history would be necessary. This would involve examining databases like the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS) to identify previous awards, contract types, agencies served, and performance history. Key indicators would include the volume and value of previous contracts, any instances of contract modifications, terminations, or disputes, and customer feedback or performance ratings if available. A strong history with similar fabricated metal products would increase confidence in their ability to successfully execute this current $14.9 million award.

What are the potential risks associated with this contract, given its classification and competition level?

Potential risks for this contract include: 1) **Scope Creep:** If the 'miscellaneous' nature of the fabricated metal products is not clearly defined, there's a risk of scope creep, leading to increased costs or delays, although the FFP structure offers some protection. 2) **Supply Chain Disruptions:** Reliance on specific raw materials for metal fabrication can expose the contract to risks from supply chain volatility. 3) **Technical Performance:** Ensuring the fabricated products meet stringent government specifications is critical; any failure could lead to rework or rejection. 4) **Limited Competition Impact:** While competed under SAP with three bidders, the depth of competition might not be as robust as for larger, more complex procurements, potentially impacting the government's ability to secure the absolute best price or terms.

How does the use of Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP) impact the government's oversight and the contractor's flexibility?

Simplified Acquisition Procedures (SAP) are designed for procurements valued between the micro-purchase threshold and the simplified acquisition threshold (currently $250,000, but can be higher for certain agencies/situations). Using SAP for a $14.9 million contract (which exceeds the standard SAP threshold) suggests this might be a specific type of procurement or an older data point where SAP rules were applied differently, or it could indicate a potential anomaly in the data provided. Generally, SAP involves less stringent documentation and procedural requirements compared to full and open competition. This can lead to faster award times and reduced administrative burden for both the government and the contractor. However, it may also mean less formal competition, potentially less detailed technical specifications, and potentially less robust oversight mechanisms compared to larger, more complex contract vehicles. The government still maintains oversight through contract administration, but the emphasis is on efficiency for smaller-value procurements.

Industry Classification

NAICS: ManufacturingOther Fabricated Metal Product ManufacturingAll Other Miscellaneous Fabricated Metal Product Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: FURNITURE

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: COMPETED UNDER SAP

Solicitation Procedures: SIMPLIFIED ACQUISITION

Solicitation ID: 47QSSC25Q1705

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 401 COLLINS BLVD, ORRVILLE, OH, 44667

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $14,943

Exercised Options: $14,943

Current Obligation: $14,943

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 47QSSC25T000H

IDV Type: BPA

Timeline

Start Date: 2026-04-03

Current End Date: 2026-05-12

Potential End Date: 2026-05-12 00:00:00

Last Modified: 2026-04-05

More Contracts from THE Will-Burt Company

View all THE Will-Burt Company federal contracts →

Other General Services Administration Contracts

View all General Services Administration contracts →

Explore Related Government Spending