GSA awards $2.3M contract for industrial and personal service paper, with fixed-price adjustments
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $2,306 ($2.3K)
Contractor: Capp LLC
Awarding Agency: General Services Administration
Start Date: 2026-04-06
End Date: 2026-04-15
Contract Duration: 9 days
Daily Burn Rate: $256/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE WITH ECONOMIC PRICE ADJUSTMENT
Sector: Other
Official Description: BAG, PLASTIC: - SEE ATTACHED DOCUMENT FOR DETAIL.
Place of Performance
Location: CLIFTON HEIGHTS, DELAWARE County, PENNSYLVANIA, 19018
Plain-Language Summary
General Services Administration obligated $2,306.4 to CAPP LLC for work described as: BAG, PLASTIC: - SEE ATTACHED DOCUMENT FOR DETAIL. Key points: 1. Contract value of $2.3 million over 9 months suggests a moderate scale of procurement. 2. The contract type, Fixed Price with Economic Price Adjustment, aims to mitigate risks associated with fluctuating market prices for paper goods. 3. Competition was full and open, indicating a potentially competitive bidding process. 4. The award to CAPP LLC is a single task order under a broader BPA Call, suggesting a pre-negotiated framework. 5. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 424130 points to wholesale distribution of paper products. 6. The contract's duration of approximately 9 months is relatively short, implying a need for ongoing or frequent re-procurement. 7. The absence of small business set-aside flags suggests this contract was not specifically targeted for small business participation.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract value of $2.3 million for a 9-month period for paper products appears within a reasonable range for federal procurements of this nature. However, without specific details on the types and quantities of paper products, a precise value-for-money assessment is challenging. The fixed-price with economic price adjustment (EPA) clause introduces a degree of uncertainty regarding the final cost, as it allows for adjustments based on market indices. Benchmarking against similar contracts for industrial and personal service paper would be necessary for a more definitive evaluation of pricing and value.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, which typically involves soliciting bids from all responsible prospective contractors. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but this method generally fosters a competitive environment, potentially leading to better pricing and terms for the government. The award being a BPA Call indicates that a broader agreement was already in place, and this is a specific order against that agreement. The level of competition for the underlying BPA would be a more significant factor in price discovery.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is generally favorable for taxpayers as it increases the likelihood of obtaining goods and services at competitive market prices, thereby maximizing the value of federal dollars spent.
Public Impact
Federal agencies requiring industrial and personal service paper products are the primary beneficiaries. The contract facilitates the supply of essential paper goods necessary for administrative and operational functions within government offices. The geographic impact is primarily within Pennsylvania, where the contract is registered, though the actual distribution may be wider. The contract supports the paper wholesale distribution sector, contributing to the supply chain for these essential materials.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Economic price adjustment clause introduces potential for cost increases beyond initial fixed price.
- Short contract duration may lead to frequent re-competition and potential disruption if not managed proactively.
- Lack of specific details on paper types and quantities limits a thorough value-for-money analysis.
- Reliance on a BPA Call means the true competition level depends on the underlying BPA's terms and bidder pool.
Positive Signals
- Full and open competition is a positive indicator for achieving competitive pricing.
- Fixed-price structure with EPA provides some cost certainty while allowing for market fluctuations.
- Awarding agency (GSA) is experienced in managing federal procurements.
- Contract supports the ongoing operational needs of federal agencies.
Sector Analysis
The procurement falls within the broader category of wholesale trade, specifically focusing on paper and related product distribution. The market for paper products is mature, with numerous suppliers and distributors. Federal spending in this area is typically driven by the ongoing operational needs of government agencies for administrative, printing, and packaging supplies. Benchmarking would involve comparing this contract's value and terms against other federal or state contracts for similar paper goods, considering volume, quality, and delivery terms.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). This suggests that the procurement was open to all responsible bidders, including large businesses. While there is no direct subcontracting requirement specified, large prime contractors often utilize small businesses for portions of their work. The absence of a small business set-aside means that opportunities for small businesses to directly compete for this specific contract were limited unless they were part of a larger bid or the underlying BPA.
Oversight & Accountability
The General Services Administration (GSA) is responsible for overseeing this contract. As a task order under a BPA Call, oversight would involve monitoring CAPP LLC's performance against the terms of the order and the underlying BPA. Transparency is facilitated through contract databases like FPDS. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of suspected fraud, waste, or abuse related to the contract. The fixed-price with EPA structure requires careful monitoring of price adjustments to ensure they are justified by market conditions.
Related Government Programs
- Federal Supply Schedule (FSS) contracts for office supplies
- General Services Administration (GSA) Multiple Award Schedules (MAS)
- Procurements for printing and writing paper
- Industrial supplies contracts
Risk Flags
- Potential for cost escalation due to EPA clause.
- Limited transparency on specific product details and quantities.
- Competition level for the individual BPA Call is not explicitly detailed.
Tags
gsa, general-services-administration, paper-products, industrial-supplies, wholesale-trade, fixed-price-economic-price-adjustment, full-and-open-competition, bpa-call, pennsylvania, moderate-value, supply-chain
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
General Services Administration awarded $2,306.4 to CAPP LLC. BAG, PLASTIC: - SEE ATTACHED DOCUMENT FOR DETAIL.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is CAPP LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $2,306.4.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2026-04-06. End: 2026-04-15.
What is the specific breakdown of paper products included in this contract and their respective quantities?
The provided data indicates the contract is for 'BAG, PLASTIC: - SEE ATTACHED DOCUMENT FOR DETAIL.' However, the specific details of the paper products, their types (e.g., copier paper, specialty paper, bags), quantities, and quality specifications are not available in the summary data. This level of detail is crucial for a comprehensive value-for-money assessment and for comparing this contract against market benchmarks. Without this information, it is difficult to determine if the $2.3 million award represents a fair price for the goods procured. Further analysis would require accessing the attached document or the full contract details.
How does the pricing of this contract compare to similar federal or commercial contracts for paper products?
A direct comparison of pricing is challenging without specific product details and quantities. However, the contract's value of $2.3 million over approximately 9 months suggests a moderate volume. The 'Fixed Price with Economic Price Adjustment' (EPA) clause means the final cost could vary. To benchmark effectively, one would need to identify comparable federal contracts (e.g., under GSA Schedules or other BPAs) for similar paper goods, considering factors like volume discounts, delivery terms, and the specific indices used for EPA. Commercial market rates for wholesale paper distributors would also serve as a benchmark, though federal procurement often involves different pricing structures and administrative overhead.
What is the track record of CAPP LLC in fulfilling federal contracts, particularly for paper products?
Information regarding CAPP LLC's specific track record for fulfilling federal contracts, especially for paper products, is not detailed in the provided summary data. A thorough assessment would require examining CAPP LLC's past performance ratings on federal contracts, the types of goods and services previously provided, contract values, and any history of performance issues or awards. Databases like the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS) or the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) would be essential resources to evaluate their reliability, experience, and overall performance history in meeting government requirements.
What are the potential risks associated with the 'Fixed Price with Economic Price Adjustment' (EPA) contract type for this procurement?
The primary risk with a Fixed Price with EPA contract is the potential for cost escalation beyond the initially anticipated fixed price. While the EPA is designed to account for legitimate market fluctuations in raw material or labor costs, it can lead to higher overall spending for the government if market prices rise significantly. This necessitates robust monitoring by the contracting officer to ensure that any price adjustments are justified according to the contract's specified indices and clauses. The risk for taxpayers is paying more than initially budgeted if market conditions are unfavorable. Conversely, it protects the contractor from unforeseen cost increases, ensuring supply continuity.
How does the fact that this is a 'BPA Call' affect the overall competition and value for money?
This contract is a specific task order issued under a Blanket Purchase Agreement (BPA) Call. This implies that the initial competition and negotiation occurred when the BPA itself was established. The 'Full and Open Competition' designation likely applies to the establishment of the BPA, not necessarily this individual call. The value and competition for this specific call depend on the terms of the BPA, the number of pre-qualified vendors under that BPA, and whether this call was competed among them or awarded based on pre-negotiated terms. If the BPA had limited competition, this call might inherit that limitation. However, if the BPA was broadly competed, this call could still represent good value, assuming fair pricing within the BPA's framework.
What is the historical spending pattern for industrial and personal service paper products by the General Services Administration?
Analyzing historical spending patterns for industrial and personal service paper products by the GSA would require accessing comprehensive federal procurement data over several fiscal years. This would involve querying databases like FPDS for NAICS code 424130 or related product service codes (PSCs) awarded by GSA. Such an analysis would reveal trends in spending volume, average contract values, dominant contract types, and key awardees. Understanding these patterns can help contextualize the current $2.3 million award, identifying whether it represents an increase or decrease in spending, and whether it aligns with historical procurement strategies for these essential supplies.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Wholesale Trade › Paper and Paper Product Merchant Wholesalers › Industrial and Personal Service Paper Merchant Wholesalers
Product/Service Code: OFFICE SUPPLIES AND DEVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE WITH ECONOMIC PRICE ADJUSTMENT (K)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 201 MARPLE AVE, CLIFTON HEIGHTS, PA, 19018
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $2,306
Exercised Options: $2,306
Current Obligation: $2,306
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: 47QSEA21A0009
IDV Type: BPA
Timeline
Start Date: 2026-04-06
Current End Date: 2026-04-15
Potential End Date: 2026-04-15 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2026-04-07
More Contracts from Capp LLC
- BAG,Plastic — $45.0K (General Services Administration)
- BAG, Sand: Item Name BAG, Sand (polypropylene Digital Camouflage Printed) I.A.W. A-A-52142 Type: II - Sewn Seam BAG Color: 1 - Camouflage Green 483 Face Width 17.00 Inches Overall Height 27.00 Inches Overall Fabric Weight 80.00 GSM (0.262 OZ / PER SQ — $12.5K (General Services Administration)
- BAG, Plastic: - SEE Attached Document for Detail — $9.9K (General Services Administration)
- Plastic BAG — $7.6K (General Services Administration)
- BAG, Textile: - SEE Attached Document for Detail — $5.1K (General Services Administration)
Other General Services Administration Contracts
- Software Life Cycle Development — $1.4B (Science Applications International Corporation)
- Task Order (TO) 47qfca21f0018 IS Hereby Awarded to Booz Allen Hamilton, Inc. (BAH) to Provide Enterprise Level Data to the Ousd(c), and ITS Strategic Partners (I.E., DOD Fourth Estate, DOD Departments, and IC Community) — $1.4B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)
- Federal Contract — $1.2B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)
- THE Scope of the to IS to Provide Enterprise IT Services for the Usace — $1.1B (Science Applications International Corporation)
- Task Order Award — $1.1B (Booz Allen Hamilton Inc)