GSA awards $44M in management consulting services to Zeiders Enterprises, Inc. over 4 years

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $44,019,430 ($44.0M)

Contractor: Zeiders Enterprises, Inc.

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2019-02-27

End Date: 2022-12-26

Contract Duration: 1,398 days

Daily Burn Rate: $31.5K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: IGF::OT::IGF

Place of Performance

Location: WOODBRIDGE, PRINCE WILLIAM County, VIRGINIA, 22192

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $44.0 million to ZEIDERS ENTERPRISES, INC. for work described as: IGF::OT::IGF Key points: 1. Contract awarded via full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 2. Firm Fixed Price contract type may offer cost certainty for the government. 3. Delivery Order under an existing contract indicates a need for ongoing services. 4. Contract duration of nearly 4 years suggests a significant, long-term requirement. 5. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 541611 points to general management consulting services. 6. Contractor Zeiders Enterprises, Inc. has secured a substantial award, indicating potential past performance. 7. The award value of over $44 million signifies a considerable investment in administrative and management support.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $44 million over nearly four years for administrative management and general management consulting services appears reasonable given the scope and duration. Benchmarking against similar contracts for management consulting services awarded by GSA or other agencies would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The firm fixed-price structure helps manage cost risks for the government. However, without specific deliverables and performance metrics, a definitive assessment of value is challenging.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit bids. The presence of 3 bidders suggests a moderate level of competition for this specific delivery order. While more than one bidder is positive, a higher number of bidders typically leads to more robust price discovery and potentially lower prices for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: The full and open competition process is beneficial for taxpayers as it aims to ensure the government receives competitive pricing and the best value by allowing a wide range of qualified contractors to participate.

Public Impact

Federal agencies requiring administrative management and general management consulting services benefit from this contract. The services delivered likely support improved operational efficiency, strategic planning, and program management within the awarded agency. The geographic impact is primarily within Virginia, where the contractor is located, but the services may support federal operations nationwide. The contract supports the workforce of Zeiders Enterprises, Inc., contributing to employment in the consulting sector.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep if initial requirements are not clearly defined.
Reliance on a single contractor for a significant duration could limit flexibility.
Ensuring performance metrics are met to achieve the intended value for money.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a competitive process.
Firm Fixed Price contract type provides cost predictability.
Contract duration suggests a stable, long-term need being met.
Contractor Zeiders Enterprises, Inc. has secured a significant award, implying a level of trust and capability.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically management consulting. This is a significant area of federal spending, supporting agencies in optimizing operations and achieving strategic goals. The market for management consulting services is competitive, with numerous firms offering specialized expertise. Federal spending in this category often benchmarks against private sector rates, though government procurement processes can influence final pricing.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications for small businesses stemming from a small business set-aside. The primary contractor, Zeiders Enterprises, Inc., is likely a mid-to-large-sized business given the award value. Analysis of subcontracting plans, if any, would be necessary to determine the extent of small business participation.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and program managers within the General Services Administration (GSA). Performance monitoring against the contract's terms and deliverables is crucial. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases like FPDS. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse is suspected.

Related Government Programs

Management and Financial Consulting, Acquisition and Grants Management Support and Business and Management羟
Professional Services
Management Consulting Services

Risk Flags

Contract Duration
Award Value
Competition Level

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $44.0 million to ZEIDERS ENTERPRISES, INC.. IGF::OT::IGF

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ZEIDERS ENTERPRISES, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Federal Acquisition Service).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $44.0 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2019-02-27. End: 2022-12-26.

What is the track record of Zeiders Enterprises, Inc. with federal contracts?

Zeiders Enterprises, Inc. has a history of receiving federal contracts. While this specific award of $44 million is substantial, a comprehensive review would involve examining their portfolio of past awards, including contract values, agencies served, and performance ratings. Information from sources like the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS) can reveal patterns in their contracting history, including the types of services they have provided and their success rate in competitive bidding. Understanding their past performance, including any awards or penalties, is crucial for assessing their reliability and capability to fulfill current and future government requirements.

How does the value of this contract compare to similar management consulting contracts?

The $44 million award over approximately four years for administrative management and general management consulting services represents a significant investment. To benchmark its value, one would compare it to similar contracts awarded by the General Services Administration (GSA) or other federal agencies for comparable services (NAICS 541611). Factors such as the specific scope of work, duration, and the number of bidders influence pricing. A higher number of bidders in a full and open competition generally suggests more competitive pricing. Without detailed scope comparisons, it's difficult to definitively state if this contract represents excellent or fair value, but the competitive award process is a positive indicator.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract?

Key risks include potential cost overruns if the Firm Fixed Price (FFP) contract does not adequately account for all project variables, although FFP generally shifts cost risk to the contractor. There's also a risk of underperformance if the contractor fails to meet the defined deliverables or quality standards, impacting the agency's operational efficiency. Given the nearly four-year duration, there's a risk of the contracted services becoming outdated or misaligned with evolving agency needs, necessitating contract modifications or re-competition. Ensuring clear performance metrics and robust oversight are critical to mitigating these risks.

How effective are management consulting services in improving federal agency operations?

The effectiveness of management consulting services in improving federal agency operations can vary widely. When well-defined objectives, clear deliverables, and strong performance metrics are established, these services can lead to significant improvements in efficiency, cost savings, strategic planning, and program implementation. Consultants can bring specialized expertise, objective perspectives, and best practices from other sectors. However, effectiveness is contingent on the agency's willingness to adopt recommendations, the quality of the consulting firm, and the alignment of the consulting engagement with genuine needs. Without specific details on the outcomes of this contract, it's impossible to assess its effectiveness directly.

What are the historical spending patterns for management consulting services at GSA?

Historical spending patterns for management consulting services at the General Services Administration (GSA) show a consistent and substantial investment in this area. GSA, as a major procurement and service provider for the federal government, frequently utilizes management consulting to enhance its own operations and to support other agencies. Annual spending can fluctuate based on agency priorities, budget allocations, and specific project needs. Examining multi-year trends would reveal whether spending on these services is increasing, decreasing, or remaining stable, providing context for the significance of individual contract awards like the one to Zeiders Enterprises, Inc.

What is the typical duration for federal management consulting contracts?

The typical duration for federal management consulting contracts can vary significantly depending on the scope and nature of the services required. Contracts can range from short-term, project-specific engagements lasting a few months to longer-term, strategic support agreements that extend over several years. Contracts awarded as Delivery Orders under Indefinite Delivery/Indefinite Quantity (IDIQ) vehicles, like this one appears to be, often have a base period and option periods that can extend the total performance time. A duration of nearly four years, as seen in this award, is not uncommon for substantial consulting needs that require sustained support and implementation.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 2750 KILLARNEY DRIVE SUITE 100, WOODBRIDGE, VA, 22192

Business Categories: Category Business, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $59,578,101

Exercised Options: $58,433,146

Current Obligation: $44,019,430

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS02F0234W

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline