GSA awards $3M administrative support contract to PBG Consulting, LLC for 18 months

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $3,018,684 ($3.0M)

Contractor: PBG Consulting, LLC

Awarding Agency: General Services Administration

Start Date: 2023-06-21

End Date: 2024-12-20

Contract Duration: 548 days

Daily Burn Rate: $5.5K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: PTT ADMIN SUPPORT

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20405

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

General Services Administration obligated $3.0 million to PBG CONSULTING, LLC for work described as: PTT ADMIN SUPPORT Key points: 1. Contract focuses on administrative management and general management consulting services. 2. Awarded via full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. The contract duration is 548 days, ending in December 2024. 4. The contract type is Firm Fixed Price, providing cost certainty. 5. The base contract value is approximately $3 million. 6. The contractor, PBG Consulting, LLC, is a new awardee for this type of service. 7. The contract is for services in Washington D.C.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $3 million over 18 months for administrative management consulting appears to be within a reasonable range for the scope of services. Benchmarking against similar contracts for administrative support and management consulting services would be necessary for a more precise value assessment. The firm fixed-price structure helps manage cost overruns, but the specific deliverables and their efficiency will ultimately determine the true value for money.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded through full and open competition, indicating that multiple vendors were likely solicited and had the opportunity to bid. The presence of a single award (no=1) suggests that PBG Consulting, LLC was selected as the most advantageous offer. The level of competition is positive for price discovery, as it encourages competitive pricing among bidders.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers benefit from a competitive process that aims to secure the best value for the government's investment in administrative support services.

Public Impact

Federal agencies requiring administrative management and general management consulting services will benefit from the support provided. The services delivered will enhance the operational efficiency of the General Services Administration's Office of Administrative Services. The geographic impact is concentrated in Washington D.C., where the services will be performed. The contract supports the federal workforce by providing specialized consulting expertise.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for scope creep if deliverables are not clearly defined.
Reliance on a single contractor for critical administrative functions.
Ensuring the quality and effectiveness of consulting services over the contract period.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a robust selection process.
Firm Fixed Price contract type provides cost predictability.
Contract duration aligns with the need for sustained administrative support.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the professional services sector, specifically administrative management and general management consulting. This sector is characterized by a wide range of firms, from large consultancies to specialized small businesses. The General Services Administration (GSA) is a major procurer of such services to support various federal agencies. Spending in this category is consistent with government needs for operational efficiency and expert advice.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (sb=false) and the contractor, PBG Consulting, LLC, is not explicitly identified as a small business in this data snippet. Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications for small businesses stemming from a small business set-aside. The impact on the broader small business ecosystem is neutral unless PBG Consulting, LLC engages in subcontracting with small businesses.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight will likely be managed by the contracting officer and the administrative contracting officer within the GSA's Office of Administrative Services. Performance monitoring and adherence to the firm fixed-price terms will be key accountability measures. Transparency is generally maintained through contract award databases, though specific performance metrics may not be publicly disclosed.

Related Government Programs

Administrative Support Services
Management and Consulting Services
General Services Administration Contracts
Professional Services Contracts

Risk Flags

Contract Performance Risk
Contractor Capability Assessment
Value for Money Assessment

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

General Services Administration awarded $3.0 million to PBG CONSULTING, LLC. PTT ADMIN SUPPORT

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is PBG CONSULTING, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: General Services Administration (Office of Administrative Services).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $3.0 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2023-06-21. End: 2024-12-20.

What is the track record of PBG Consulting, LLC in providing administrative management and general management consulting services to the federal government?

Based on the provided data, PBG Consulting, LLC is listed as the awardee for this specific contract. However, the data does not offer historical information about their previous performance, client satisfaction, or experience with similar federal contracts. Further investigation into federal procurement databases like SAM.gov or FPDS would be required to ascertain their track record, including past performance evaluations, previous contract values, and the types of agencies they have served. Without this additional context, it is difficult to assess their established expertise and reliability in delivering these services.

How does the awarded value of $3.02 million compare to similar administrative support contracts awarded by GSA or other federal agencies?

The awarded value of approximately $3.02 million for 18 months of administrative management and general management consulting services needs to be benchmarked against comparable contracts. Factors such as the specific scope of work, the level of expertise required, the duration, and the geographic location significantly influence contract pricing. A preliminary assessment suggests this value is within a typical range for such services, but a detailed comparison with contracts for similar services, potentially using data from FPDS-NG or other procurement analytics tools, is necessary. This would involve identifying contracts with similar North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) codes (e.g., 541611) and similar service descriptions to determine if the pricing is competitive and reflects fair market value.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they being mitigated?

Key risks for this contract include potential performance issues if PBG Consulting, LLC does not meet service level expectations, scope creep that could lead to cost overruns (though mitigated by FFP), and contractor dependency. Mitigation strategies likely involve robust performance monitoring by the GSA, clearly defined deliverables and key performance indicators (KPIs) within the contract, and regular communication channels between the government and the contractor. The firm-fixed-price (FFP) contract type itself mitigates financial risk for the government by establishing a ceiling cost. However, ensuring the quality and effectiveness of the consulting services throughout the 18-month period remains a critical oversight function.

How effective is the 'full and open competition' approach in ensuring the best value for taxpayers in this specific contract award?

The 'full and open competition' approach is generally considered the most effective method for ensuring best value for taxpayers, as it allows a wide range of qualified vendors to compete, driving down prices and encouraging innovation. In this case, with a single award to PBG Consulting, LLC, the effectiveness hinges on the thoroughness of the evaluation process. If the solicitation clearly defined requirements and evaluation criteria, and the selection process rigorously assessed technical capabilities, past performance, and price, then taxpayers likely benefited from a competitive environment. However, the true measure of effectiveness will be the quality of services delivered and whether they meet or exceed expectations within the contracted budget.

What is the historical spending pattern for administrative management and general management consulting services by the General Services Administration?

The General Services Administration (GSA) consistently spends significant amounts on administrative management and general management consulting services to support its vast operations and provide shared services to other federal agencies. Historical spending in this category typically reflects the government's ongoing need for efficiency improvements, strategic planning, and operational support. Analyzing GSA's historical procurement data for NAICS code 541611 and related service descriptions would reveal trends in contract values, award volumes, and the types of contractors (large vs. small business) utilized. This contract, valued at approximately $3 million, appears to be a moderate-sized award within the broader context of GSA's overall spending on professional services.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 7925 JONES BRANCH DR STE 2125, MC LEAN, VA, 22102

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Black American Owned Business, Category Business, Economically Disadvantaged Women Owned Small Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business, Women Owned Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $3,847,125

Exercised Options: $3,018,684

Current Obligation: $3,018,684

Actual Outlays: $2,094,570

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS00F287GA

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline