VA awards $17.1M for stairlifts, with 101 Mobility LLC securing the contract under full and open competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $17,167 ($17.2K)

Contractor: 101 Mobility LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Veterans Affairs

Start Date: 2026-04-02

End Date: 2026-09-02

Contract Duration: 153 days

Daily Burn Rate: $112/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Healthcare

Official Description: STAIRGLIDE

Place of Performance

Location: SALISBURY, ROWAN County, NORTH CAROLINA, 28144

State: North Carolina Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Veterans Affairs obligated $17,166.53 to 101 MOBILITY LLC for work described as: STAIRGLIDE Key points: 1. Contract awarded to a single vendor, 101 Mobility LLC, for stairlift services. 2. The contract duration is 153 days, indicating a short-term need. 3. Pricing is based on a firm-fixed-price structure, providing cost certainty. 4. The award was made under full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 5. The North Carolina location of the contractor may influence service delivery logistics. 6. The contract falls under the Surgical and Medical Instrument Manufacturing NAICS code.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $17.1 million for a 153-day period appears high for stairlift services, suggesting potential overpricing or a scope beyond simple installation. Benchmarking against similar VA contracts for mobility equipment or specialized medical devices is necessary to determine value for money. Without more detailed scope of work, it's difficult to definitively assess if the pricing is competitive or if it reflects a premium for specialized services or rapid deployment.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

The contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid. The data does not specify the number of bids received, which is crucial for a complete assessment of competition dynamics. A robust competition typically leads to better pricing and value for the government. The absence of this detail limits the analysis of how effectively the competitive process translated into cost savings.

Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is generally favorable for taxpayers as it encourages multiple vendors to offer their best pricing, potentially leading to lower overall costs for the government.

Public Impact

Veterans requiring mobility assistance will benefit from the provision of stairlift services. The services are intended to improve accessibility and quality of life for beneficiaries. Service delivery is likely concentrated in North Carolina, based on the contractor's location. The contract supports jobs within the medical equipment manufacturing and installation sector.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

High contract value for a short duration raises questions about cost-effectiveness.
Lack of detail on the number of bidders limits assessment of competitive pressure.
Potential for price inflation given the significant dollar amount for a 153-day term.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a fair process.
Firm-fixed-price contract provides budget certainty.
Addresses a critical need for mobility-impaired veterans.

Sector Analysis

The Surgical and Medical Instrument Manufacturing sector encompasses a wide range of products and services. This contract for stairlifts falls within the broader medical equipment category, which is a significant market driven by healthcare needs and an aging population. Government procurement in this sector often involves specialized equipment requiring specific certifications and installation expertise. Benchmarking this contract against other government purchases of similar mobility aids or accessibility equipment would provide further context on its market positioning.

Small Business Impact

The contract was awarded under full and open competition and does not indicate any specific small business set-aside. Therefore, the direct impact on small businesses through this specific award is likely minimal unless 101 Mobility LLC utilizes small business subcontractors. Further investigation into subcontracting plans would be needed to assess the broader impact on the small business ecosystem.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the Department of Veterans Affairs' contracting officers and program managers. The firm-fixed-price nature of the contract provides some level of cost control. Transparency regarding the specific services rendered and performance metrics would be key for accountability. Inspector General involvement would be contingent on any reported issues of fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

VA Medical Equipment Procurement
Home Health Services Contracts
Mobility Assistance Devices
Federal Healthcare Spending

Risk Flags

High contract value for short duration
Lack of detailed competition metrics
Potential for cost overruns if scope is not well-defined

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Veterans Affairs awarded $17,166.53 to 101 MOBILITY LLC. STAIRGLIDE

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is 101 MOBILITY LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Veterans Affairs (Department of Veterans Affairs).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $17,166.53.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2026-04-02. End: 2026-09-02.

What is the specific scope of work included in this $17.1 million contract for stairlifts, and how does it justify the high cost for a 153-day period?

The provided data does not detail the specific scope of work beyond 'stairlifts.' A contract value of $17.1 million for a 153-day period (approximately 5 months) is exceptionally high for standard stairlift installation and maintenance. This suggests the scope may include a large volume of installations, complex custom solutions, specialized maintenance agreements, or potentially related assistive technology services. Without a detailed breakdown of units, service levels, or specific technological requirements, it is difficult to ascertain the precise justification for the cost. Further analysis would require access to the contract's statement of work, delivery schedules, and any associated technical specifications to benchmark against industry standards for similar large-scale or specialized mobility aid deployments.

How many bids were received for this contract, and what was the range of proposed prices?

The provided data indicates that the contract was awarded under 'FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION,' which implies that multiple vendors were eligible to bid. However, the specific number of bids received and the range of proposed prices are not included in the data. This information is critical for a comprehensive assessment of the competitive landscape and to determine if the awarded price represents a good value for the government. A low number of bids or a wide disparity in pricing could indicate potential issues with the solicitation, market readiness, or the competitiveness of the bidding environment. Without these details, it's challenging to definitively conclude the effectiveness of the competition in driving down costs.

What is the track record of 101 Mobility LLC in performing similar government contracts, particularly for the Department of Veterans Affairs?

The provided data identifies 101 Mobility LLC as the contractor but does not include information on their past performance history, especially concerning government contracts. To assess their track record, one would need to examine databases like the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS) or the Contractor Performance Assessment Reporting System (CPARS) for previous awards, performance evaluations, and any documented issues. A history of successful, timely, and high-quality performance on similar contracts, particularly with the VA, would increase confidence in their ability to meet the requirements of this new award. Conversely, a history of performance problems or disputes could signal potential risks.

How does the $17.1 million contract value compare to historical VA spending on stairlifts or similar mobility equipment over comparable periods?

The provided data offers a single contract award of $17.1 million for a 153-day period. To compare this to historical VA spending, one would need to access historical procurement data for stairlifts, mobility aids, or related accessibility equipment. This would involve searching databases for previous contracts awarded by the VA, noting their values, durations, and the scope of services. A comparison could reveal if this contract represents an increase or decrease in spending, if the unit costs are consistent with past procurements, or if the scope has expanded significantly. Without historical data, it is difficult to contextualize the current award within the VA's broader spending patterns for such equipment.

Are there any specific performance risks associated with this contract, such as delivery delays, quality issues, or maintenance challenges, given the contractor's location in North Carolina?

The data indicates the contractor, 101 Mobility LLC, is located in North Carolina. While this location is provided, it does not inherently signal specific performance risks without further context. Potential risks could arise if the contract requires service delivery across a wide geographic area beyond North Carolina, potentially leading to logistical challenges and increased costs. Other risks might include the availability of qualified technicians, adherence to VA's specific installation and safety standards, and the responsiveness of maintenance services. Assessing these risks would require reviewing the contract's performance work statement, delivery locations, and any specific requirements related to service response times and quality assurance.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Manufacturing › Medical Equipment and Supplies Manufacturing › Surgical and Medical Instrument Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: MEDICAL/DENTAL/VETERINARY EQPT/SUPP

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 5221 OLEANDER DR, WILMINGTON, NC, 28403

Business Categories: Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Not Designated a Small Business, Partnership or Limited Liability Partnership, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $17,167

Exercised Options: $17,167

Current Obligation: $17,167

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 36F79719D0044

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline