State Department awards $3M facility management contract to Alutiiq Solutions for Alaska support

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $2,985,865 ($3.0M)

Contractor: Alutiiq Solutions, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of State

Start Date: 2025-08-14

End Date: 2026-08-13

Contract Duration: 364 days

Daily Burn Rate: $8.2K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS

Sector: Other

Official Description: FACILITY MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES

Place of Performance

Location: ANCHORAGE, ANCHORAGE County, ALASKA, 99503

State: Alaska Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of State obligated $3.0 million to ALUTIIQ SOLUTIONS, LLC for work described as: FACILITY MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES Key points: 1. Contract value appears reasonable for a one-year facility management services agreement in Alaska. 2. Full and open competition was utilized, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 3. Performance period is standard for this type of service contract. 4. The contract falls within the Facilities Support Services sector. 5. No small business set-aside was applied, indicating a focus on broader competition.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of approximately $3 million for a one-year period for facility management services in Alaska seems aligned with market rates for similar support contracts. Benchmarking against other government contracts for facility management in remote or high-cost-of-living areas would provide further context, but the initial assessment suggests fair pricing. The award to Alutiiq Solutions, LLC, a known entity in government contracting, also lends some confidence to the value proposition.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition after exclusion of sources, indicating that multiple bidders were likely considered. The specific details of the bidding process, such as the number of proposals received and the evaluation criteria, are not provided. However, the 'full and open' designation generally implies a robust competition that should drive competitive pricing and ensure a wide range of qualified contractors had an opportunity to bid.

Taxpayer Impact: The use of full and open competition is beneficial for taxpayers as it maximizes the potential for receiving the best value through a competitive bidding process, potentially leading to lower costs and higher quality services.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the Department of State personnel and operations at the designated facility in Alaska. Services delivered include essential facility management functions to ensure operational continuity. The geographic impact is localized to Alaska, supporting federal presence in the region. Workforce implications include potential employment opportunities for local staff through the contractor.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for increased costs if competition was less robust than indicated by 'full and open' designation.
Dependence on a single contractor for critical facility operations carries inherent risks.

Positive Signals

Award to an established contractor suggests a degree of reliability.
Clear performance period and defined scope of work provide a framework for accountability.

Sector Analysis

Facility management services represent a significant segment of the government contracting market, encompassing a wide range of support functions necessary for the operation of federal facilities. This contract, valued at approximately $3 million annually, fits within the broader landscape of support services procured by various federal agencies. Comparable spending benchmarks for facility management in similar geographic regions or for agencies with comparable operational needs would further contextualize this award.

Small Business Impact

This contract was not awarded as a small business set-aside, nor does it appear to have specific subcontracting requirements for small businesses mentioned in the provided data. This suggests that the primary focus was on securing the best overall offer through open competition, rather than specifically targeting small business participation. The impact on the small business ecosystem is likely minimal unless Alutiiq Solutions voluntarily engages small businesses for subcontracting.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the contracting officer and the program office within the Department of State. Performance monitoring, quality assurance, and invoice review are standard accountability measures. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases, though detailed performance reports are often internal. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of suspected fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Department of State Facilities Operations
Federal Building Maintenance Contracts
Government Support Services
Alaska Federal Contracts

Risk Flags

Potential for cost overruns due to remote location.
Dependence on contractor for critical infrastructure.
Limited visibility into specific performance metrics.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of State awarded $3.0 million to ALUTIIQ SOLUTIONS, LLC. FACILITY MANAGEMENT SUPPORT SERVICES

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ALUTIIQ SOLUTIONS, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of State (Department of State).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $3.0 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-08-14. End: 2026-08-13.

What is the track record of Alutiiq Solutions, LLC with Department of State contracts?

Alutiiq Solutions, LLC has a history of performing various support services for federal agencies, including the Department of State. Analyzing their past performance on similar facility management or base operations support contracts would reveal their reliability, adherence to schedules, and quality of service. Specific metrics such as past performance ratings, any contract disputes, or awards for exceptional performance would provide a clearer picture of their capabilities and suitability for this ongoing requirement. A review of their contract history with the State Department would indicate if they have successfully managed similar scopes of work within budget and timeline constraints.

How does the awarded amount compare to similar facility management contracts in Alaska?

The awarded amount of approximately $3 million for a one-year facility management contract in Alaska needs to be benchmarked against similar contracts to assess value for money. Alaska's unique logistical challenges and higher cost of living can significantly influence service costs. Comparing this contract's value to other government facility management contracts in remote or high-cost regions, or specifically within Alaska, would provide crucial context. Factors such as the scope of services (e.g., janitorial, HVAC, groundskeeping, security), facility size, and specific location within Alaska are critical for a fair comparison. Without direct comparable data, it's difficult to definitively state if this represents excellent or merely fair value.

What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) for this contract, and how are they monitored?

While specific KPIs are not detailed in the provided data, typical performance indicators for facility management contracts include response times for maintenance requests, preventative maintenance completion rates, energy efficiency targets, safety compliance, and overall client satisfaction. The Department of State's contracting officer and designated representatives would be responsible for monitoring these KPIs. Performance would likely be assessed through regular meetings, site inspections, and review of contractor-submitted reports. Failure to meet KPIs could result in contractual remedies, including financial penalties or termination.

What is the historical spending pattern for facility management services at this specific State Department location in Alaska?

To assess historical spending patterns, one would need to examine previous contracts awarded for facility management services at this particular Department of State location in Alaska. This would involve searching federal procurement databases for prior awards, noting the contractors, contract values, durations, and scopes of work. Analyzing this historical data would reveal trends in spending, identify any significant increases or decreases in costs over time, and highlight any changes in the service providers. Understanding this history is crucial for evaluating whether the current $3 million award represents a consistent, increased, or decreased level of investment for these services.

What are the potential risks associated with relying on Alutiiq Solutions, LLC for these critical services?

Potential risks associated with relying on Alutiiq Solutions, LLC include contractor performance issues, such as failure to meet service level agreements, inadequate staffing, or quality control deficiencies. There's also a risk of key personnel departure, which could disrupt operations. Financial instability of the contractor, though less likely for an established entity, is another consideration. Furthermore, unforeseen events like natural disasters in Alaska could impact service delivery and necessitate contingency planning. The Department of State mitigates these risks through contract oversight, performance monitoring, and clear contractual remedies.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Solicitation ID: 19AQMM25R0157

Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS (Z)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Afognak Native Corporation

Address: 3909 ARCTIC BLVD STE 500, ANCHORAGE, AK, 99503

Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Alaskan Native Corporation Owned Firm, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Tribally Owned Firm, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $25,723,861

Exercised Options: $6,317,337

Current Obligation: $2,985,865

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 19AQMM25D0975

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline