DoD awards $19.8M contract for Raymark Superfund site stormwater pumping station

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $19,760,224 ($19.8M)

Contractor: P & S Construction Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2022-04-08

End Date: 2025-03-09

Contract Duration: 1,066 days

Daily Burn Rate: $18.5K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Number of Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Construction

Official Description: CONSTRUCT A STORMWATER PUMPING STATION TO SUPPORT THE RAYMARK SUPERFUND SITE REMEDIATION IN STRATFORD CONNECTICUT.

Place of Performance

Location: STRATFORD, FAIRFIELD County, CONNECTICUT, 06614

State: Connecticut Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $19.8 million to P & S CONSTRUCTION INC. for work described as: CONSTRUCT A STORMWATER PUMPING STATION TO SUPPORT THE RAYMARK SUPERFUND SITE REMEDIATION IN STRATFORD CONNECTICUT. Key points: 1. Contract value represents a significant investment in environmental remediation infrastructure. 2. Competition dynamics suggest a potentially competitive bidding environment for specialized construction. 3. Contract duration of over two years indicates a complex and lengthy project. 4. Project location in Connecticut aligns with Superfund site remediation efforts in the region. 5. Firm-fixed-price contract type aims to control costs for the government. 6. The project supports critical environmental cleanup operations at a designated Superfund site.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $19.8 million for constructing a stormwater pumping station appears reasonable given the scope of work at a Superfund site. While direct comparisons are difficult without specific project details, similar large-scale environmental infrastructure projects often fall within this range. The firm-fixed-price structure suggests an effort to manage costs effectively. Benchmarking against similar construction projects for environmental remediation would provide further insight into value for money.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The contract was awarded under 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources,' indicating that while competition was sought, certain sources were excluded, possibly due to specific qualifications or prior involvement. With 3 bidders, the competition level was moderate, which can lead to price discovery but may not be as robust as a fully open competition with a larger number of participants. The exclusion of sources warrants further investigation into the rationale.

Taxpayer Impact: A moderate level of competition, while providing some price discovery, means taxpayers may not have benefited from the lowest possible price achievable in a broader competitive landscape. The exclusion of potential bidders could limit overall cost savings.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the residents and environment of Stratford, Connecticut, through the remediation of the Raymark Superfund site. The project will deliver a critical piece of infrastructure: a stormwater pumping station essential for managing contaminated water. Geographic impact is localized to the Raymark Superfund site and surrounding areas in Stratford, CT. Workforce implications include employment opportunities for construction workers, engineers, and environmental specialists during the project's duration.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for cost overruns if unforeseen site conditions arise during construction.
Risk of project delays due to the complex nature of Superfund site remediation.
Dependence on the contractor's ability to manage specialized environmental construction requirements.

Positive Signals

Firm-fixed-price contract helps mitigate cost escalation risks for the government.
Clear project objective focused on a critical environmental remediation task.
Defined contract duration provides a framework for project management and oversight.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the heavy and civil engineering construction sector, specifically focusing on water and sewer infrastructure. The market for Superfund site remediation is specialized, involving firms with expertise in environmental engineering and construction. Spending in this area is driven by regulatory requirements and long-term environmental stewardship initiatives. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically be found in large-scale public works and environmental cleanup projects.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small business participation was not a primary focus for this contract, as the 'small business' flag is false. There is no explicit mention of small business set-asides or subcontracting requirements in the provided data. This suggests that the prime contractor, P & S CONSTRUCTION INC., is likely a larger entity, and the subcontracting opportunities for small businesses would depend on their internal procurement practices rather than contractual mandates.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract will likely be managed by the Department of the Army, given the agency is the Department of Defense. Accountability measures are typically embedded within the contract terms, including performance milestones and quality control. Transparency can be assessed through contract award notices and potential public reporting on project progress. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse is suspected.

Related Government Programs

Superfund Program
Environmental Remediation Contracts
Water Infrastructure Construction
Department of Defense Construction Projects

Risk Flags

Potential for environmental hazards at Superfund site.
Complexity of specialized construction requirements.
Moderate competition level may impact final price.
Contract duration extends over multiple fiscal years.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $19.8 million to P & S CONSTRUCTION INC.. CONSTRUCT A STORMWATER PUMPING STATION TO SUPPORT THE RAYMARK SUPERFUND SITE REMEDIATION IN STRATFORD CONNECTICUT.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is P & S CONSTRUCTION INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $19.8 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2022-04-08. End: 2025-03-09.

What is the track record of P & S CONSTRUCTION INC. in handling similar environmental remediation projects?

Assessing the track record of P & S CONSTRUCTION INC. requires a review of their past performance on contracts, particularly those involving environmental remediation and the construction of specialized infrastructure like pumping stations. Information on previous projects, client satisfaction, adherence to schedules and budgets, and any history of disputes or contract modifications would be crucial. Publicly available contract databases and past performance reviews can provide insights into their experience and reliability in executing complex projects of this nature. Without specific data on P & S CONSTRUCTION INC.'s past performance, it is difficult to definitively assess their suitability for this critical Superfund site project.

How does the awarded amount compare to the estimated cost or budget for this stormwater pumping station project?

The provided data shows the awarded amount is $19,760,224.09. To compare this to the estimated cost or budget, we would need access to the government's initial cost estimates or the budget allocated for this specific project. If the awarded amount is significantly lower than the estimate, it could indicate successful cost negotiation or competitive bidding. Conversely, if it's higher, it might suggest unforeseen complexities or a less competitive bidding environment. Without the government's internal cost estimates, a direct comparison to determine value for money is not possible from the data provided.

What are the specific risks associated with constructing a pumping station at a Superfund site, and how are they mitigated in this contract?

Constructing a pumping station at a Superfund site presents unique risks, including potential exposure to hazardous materials, unforeseen ground contamination, and the need for specialized waste handling and disposal. Mitigation strategies are typically embedded within the contract. The firm-fixed-price structure helps manage cost risks, while detailed specifications and performance standards address quality and functionality. The 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' might imply that bidders with specific environmental expertise and safety protocols were prioritized. Further risk mitigation would involve rigorous site assessments, environmental monitoring during construction, and strict adherence to safety and environmental regulations outlined in the contract.

What is the expected effectiveness of this pumping station in supporting the Raymark Superfund site remediation?

The effectiveness of the stormwater pumping station is directly tied to its role in managing contaminated runoff and groundwater at the Raymark Superfund site. Its primary function will be to collect, treat (if applicable), and safely discharge or contain stormwater that may have come into contact with contaminants. This prevents the spread of pollution to surrounding areas and waterways, which is a critical step in the overall remediation strategy. The station's design capacity, operational reliability, and integration with other remediation systems will determine its success. Its effectiveness will be measured by its ability to meet regulatory discharge limits and contribute to the long-term cleanup goals for the site.

How has federal spending on Superfund site remediation, particularly for infrastructure like pumping stations, trended in recent years?

Federal spending on Superfund site remediation has generally seen fluctuations over recent years, influenced by budget allocations, legislative priorities, and the number of active cleanup sites. Infrastructure projects, such as stormwater pumping stations, are a crucial component of many remediation efforts. While specific data on spending trends for pumping stations alone is not readily available, overall Superfund program funding is a key indicator. Historically, funding levels have varied, with periods of increased investment driven by environmental initiatives and congressional appropriations. Analyzing the broader trends in EPA and DoD environmental cleanup budgets would provide context for this specific contract's place within overall federal spending on Superfund sites.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Construction › Utility System Construction › Water and Sewer Line and Related Structures Construction

Product/Service Code: CONSTRUCT OF STRUCTURES/FACILITIES › CONSTRUCTION OF BUILDINGS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: SEALED BID

Solicitation ID: W912WJ22B0007

Offers Received: 3

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 11 SCHOOL ST STE 1, NORTH CHELMSFORD, MA, 01863

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Indian (Subcontinent) American Owned Business, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $19,760,224

Exercised Options: $19,760,224

Current Obligation: $19,760,224

Actual Outlays: $1,265,658

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Timeline