DoD's $20.4M Facilities Support Services Contract with TSAY/FERGUSON-WILLIAMS, LLC Awarded via Full and Open Competition
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $20,380,681 ($20.4M)
Contractor: Tsay/Ferguson-Williams, LLC
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2008-06-19
End Date: 2013-04-23
Contract Duration: 1,769 days
Daily Burn Rate: $11.5K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Number of Offers Received: 8
Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE
Sector: Other
Official Description: OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE CPAF J. STROM THURMOND
Place of Performance
Location: CLARKS HILL, MCCORMICK County, SOUTH CAROLINA, 29821
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $20.4 million to TSAY/FERGUSON-WILLIAMS, LLC for work described as: OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE CPAF J. STROM THURMOND Key points: 1. Contract awarded to TSAY/FERGUSON-WILLIAMS, LLC for facilities support services. 2. Totaling $20.4 million, the contract spans nearly 5 years. 3. Awarded under full and open competition after exclusion of sources. 4. Services provided in South Carolina. 5. Cost Plus Award Fee contract type.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract's Cost Plus Award Fee structure incentivizes performance but can lead to higher costs if not managed carefully. Benchmarking against similar facilities support contracts is difficult without detailed service scope.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded through full and open competition after exclusion of sources, suggesting a competitive bidding process. This method generally promotes price discovery and potentially better value.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are utilized for essential facilities support services, with the competitive award aiming for efficient resource allocation.
Public Impact
Ensures operational readiness of facilities through essential maintenance and support services. Supports military personnel and operations by maintaining critical infrastructure. Contributes to the local economy through contract performance and potential subcontracting.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Cost Plus Award Fee structure requires careful monitoring to ensure cost control.
- Exclusion of sources in competition may warrant further review for full transparency.
- Contract duration of nearly 5 years may limit flexibility for future service needs.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a robust selection process.
- Focus on facilities support is critical for operational effectiveness.
- Performance-based fee structure can drive contractor efficiency.
Sector Analysis
Facilities Support Services fall under the broader professional, scientific, and technical services sector. Spending in this sector is substantial across government, supporting a wide range of operational needs.
Small Business Impact
The contract was not awarded to a small business. Analysis of subcontracting opportunities for small businesses is not provided in the data.
Oversight & Accountability
The use of a Cost Plus Award Fee contract necessitates robust oversight from the Department of the Army to ensure performance standards are met and costs are justified.
Related Government Programs
- Facilities Support Services
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Potential for cost overruns due to CPAF structure.
- Limited transparency on source exclusion rationale.
- Long contract duration may not reflect evolving needs.
- Lack of small business participation noted.
Tags
facilities-support-services, department-of-defense, sc, definitive-contract, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $20.4 million to TSAY/FERGUSON-WILLIAMS, LLC. OPERATION AND MAINTENANCE CPAF J. STROM THURMOND
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is TSAY/FERGUSON-WILLIAMS, LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $20.4 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2008-06-19. End: 2013-04-23.
What specific performance metrics are tied to the award fee, and how are they measured to ensure value for money?
The effectiveness of the award fee hinges on clearly defined, measurable performance standards directly linked to the facilities support services provided. Robust government oversight is crucial to accurately assess contractor performance against these metrics, ensuring that award fees are earned based on genuine value and efficiency, rather than subjective criteria. Without this, the incentive structure may not translate into optimal taxpayer value.
What was the rationale for excluding specific sources during the 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources' process, and did this impact the final price?
The exclusion of sources typically occurs when specific technical capabilities or past performance are required that only a limited number of contractors possess. Understanding the precise criteria for exclusion is vital to assess if it unduly restricted competition. If the exclusion significantly narrowed the field, it could have potentially limited price competition and resulted in a higher-than-optimal contract price for the government.
How does the performance of TSAY/FERGUSON-WILLIAMS, LLC on this contract compare to industry benchmarks for facilities support services in terms of cost and quality?
A comprehensive comparison requires access to detailed performance data and cost breakdowns, which are not fully available here. However, the contract's Cost Plus Award Fee structure suggests a focus on performance. Evaluating the actual award fees paid versus the base cost, alongside any government performance reviews, would provide insights into whether the contractor met or exceeded industry standards for efficiency and service quality.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services
Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › HOUSEKEEPING SERVICES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Solicitation ID: W912HN07R0027
Offers Received: 8
Pricing Type: COST PLUS AWARD FEE (R)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Tsay Corporation (UEI: 926020744)
Address: HWY 68 NORTH OF ESPANOLA, SAN JUAN PUEBLO, NM, 87566
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Government, Native American Tribal Government, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, Tribally Owned Firm, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $21,243,126
Exercised Options: $21,243,126
Current Obligation: $20,380,681
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Timeline
Start Date: 2008-06-19
Current End Date: 2013-04-23
Potential End Date: 2013-04-23 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2020-09-28
More Contracts from Tsay/Ferguson-Williams, LLC
- DPW Operations and Maintenance Fs&haaf, GA — $307.1M (Department of Defense)
- Facility Maintenance - Vertical 411A — $25.7M (Department of Defense)
- Security Guard Services AT Naval Base Ventura County — $20.1M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)