DoD Awards $18.25M for Engineering Services to ManTech, Lacking Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $18,254,196 ($18.3M)

Contractor: Mantech Advanced Systems International, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2006-01-23

End Date: 2008-11-01

Contract Duration: 1,013 days

Daily Burn Rate: $18.0K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS

Sector: Defense

Official Description: 200604!600157!2100!W909MY!USA COMMUNICATIONS-ELECTRONICS !W909MY06C0020 !A!N! !Y! ! !20060123!20070122!801008228!801008228!053518312!N!MANTECH TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND!14119-A SULLYFIELD CIRCLE !CHANTILLY !VA!20151!51000!031!51!MELROSE !CAMPBELL !VIRGINIA !+000003694221!N!N!000000000000!R499!OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !NOT DISCERNABLE !541330!E! !1! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !N!A!D!U!Y!1!001!N!2A!C!Y!Z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !Z!Z!A!A!000!A!C!N! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! !

Place of Performance

Location: FAIRFAX, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 22033, UNITED STATES OF AMERICA

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $18.3 million to MANTECH ADVANCED SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC. for work described as: 200604!600157!2100!W909MY!USA COMMUNICATIONS-ELECTRONICS !W909MY06C0020 !A!N! !Y! ! !20060123!20070122!801008228!801008228!053518312!N!MANTECH TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND!14119-A SULLYFIELD CIRCLE !CHANTILLY !VA!20151!51000!031!51!MELROSE !CAMP… Key points: 1. Contract awarded for Engineering Services to ManTech Advanced Systems International, Inc. 2. Significant award value of $18.25 million over a 1013-day period. 3. Contract was not competed, raising questions about price discovery and value. 4. Sector is Defense, specifically Engineering Services, a critical area for national security.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract value of $18.25 million for engineering services over approximately 2.8 years appears substantial. Without competitive bidding, it's difficult to benchmark against similar contracts to determine if the pricing is optimal for the government.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

The contract was not competed, indicating a sole-source or limited competition award. This lack of competition may have limited the government's ability to secure the best possible pricing and terms.

Taxpayer Impact: The absence of competition could lead to higher costs for taxpayers compared to a scenario where multiple vendors vied for the contract.

Public Impact

Taxpayers may be overpaying for engineering services due to the lack of competitive bidding. The Department of Defense relies on these services, making oversight crucial for mission success. Lack of transparency in the procurement process can erode public trust in government spending.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of competition
Potential for overpayment
Limited transparency

Positive Signals

Award to established company
Services critical to defense

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the Engineering Services sector (NAICS 541330), a vital component of the Defense industry. Spending in this area is typically high due to complex project requirements and national security needs.

Small Business Impact

The data does not indicate any specific provisions or considerations for small businesses in this contract award. The prime contractor is ManTech Advanced Systems International, Inc., a large entity.

Oversight & Accountability

The contract was awarded by the Department of Defense, with oversight likely managed by the Defense Contract Management Agency. The lack of competition warrants closer scrutiny to ensure accountability and value for money.

Related Government Programs

Engineering Services
Department of Defense Contracting
Defense Contract Management Agency Programs

Risk Flags

Lack of competitive bidding
Potential for inflated pricing
Limited transparency in award process
No clear small business participation noted

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $18.3 million to MANTECH ADVANCED SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC.. 200604!600157!2100!W909MY!USA COMMUNICATIONS-ELECTRONICS !W909MY06C0020 !A!N! !Y! ! !20060123!20070122!801008228!801008228!053518312!N!MANTECH TELECOMMUNICATIONS AND!14119-A SULLYFIELD CIRCLE !CHANTILLY !VA!20151!51000!031!51!MELROSE !CAMPBELL !VIRGINIA !+000003694221!N!N!000000000000!R499!OTHER PROFESSIONAL SERVICES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !NOT DISCERNABLE !541330!E! !1! ! ! ! ! !999

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is MANTECH ADVANCED SYSTEMS INTERNATIONAL, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Contract Management Agency).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $18.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2006-01-23. End: 2008-11-01.

What was the justification for not competing this significant engineering services contract?

The justification for not competing this contract is not explicitly stated in the provided data. Typically, sole-source awards require a documented justification, such as the existence of only one responsible source, urgent and compelling needs, or specific national security requirements that preclude competition. Further investigation into the contract file would be necessary to ascertain the official reason.

How can the government ensure fair pricing without competition?

Ensuring fair pricing without competition is challenging but can be approached through robust cost analysis, comparison with historical data for similar services, independent government cost estimates, and negotiation with the sole-source provider. Utilizing certified cost or pricing data and engaging technical experts to validate the proposed costs are also crucial steps to mitigate the risks associated with non-competitive awards.

What is the potential impact of this non-competitive award on future defense engineering service procurements?

A pattern of non-competitive awards, especially for significant dollar amounts, can signal a potential lack of market research or a reliance on incumbent contractors. This could discourage new entrants, reduce overall competition in the long run, and potentially lead to sustained higher costs for the government. It may also raise concerns among oversight bodies about the efficiency of the procurement process.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Architectural, Engineering, and Related Services › Engineering Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: TIME AND MATERIALS (Y)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: Mantech International Corporation (UEI: 053518312)

Address: 12015 LEE JACKSON MEMORIAL HWY, FAIRFAX, VA, 22033

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Contract Characteristics

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Timeline