DoD awards $8.56M task order for health services, with a 94% performance rating

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $8,558,069 ($8.6M)

Contractor: Giacare & Medtrust JV LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2025-10-01

End Date: 2025-12-31

Contract Duration: 91 days

Daily Burn Rate: $94.0K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Healthcare

Official Description: RN FY26 1ST TASK ORDER

Place of Performance

Location: JBSA FT SAM HOUSTON, BEXAR County, TEXAS, 78234

State: Texas Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $8.6 million to GIACARE & MEDTRUST JV LLC for work described as: RN FY26 1ST TASK ORDER Key points: 1. The contract's performance rating of 94% suggests a strong track record of successful service delivery. 2. The firm-fixed-price contract type helps mitigate cost overrun risks for the government. 3. Competition was conducted under 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources,' indicating a potentially limited but justified bidding process. 4. The task order duration of 91 days is relatively short, suggesting a focused scope of work. 5. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 621399 points to specialized health practitioner services. 6. The contract was awarded to a joint venture, potentially leveraging combined expertise and resources.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The awarded amount of $8.56 million for a 91-day period for health practitioner services appears to be within a reasonable range, especially considering the high performance rating of 94%. Benchmarking against similar contracts for specialized health services would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The firm-fixed-price structure is generally favorable for cost control. Without specific per-unit data or detailed service descriptions, a definitive value assessment is challenging, but the performance metric is a positive indicator.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The contract was awarded under 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources.' This specific procurement method suggests that while the competition was intended to be open, certain sources may have been excluded based on specific criteria or prior determinations. The number of bidders is not provided, which limits the ability to fully assess the breadth of competition. This approach can sometimes lead to less competitive pricing if the exclusion criteria are overly restrictive or not well-justified.

Taxpayer Impact: The exclusion of sources, even if justified, may limit the potential for achieving the lowest possible price for taxpayers. A broader competition typically drives down costs more effectively.

Public Impact

Beneficiaries likely include military personnel and their families requiring specialized health practitioner services. Services delivered are related to miscellaneous health practitioners, potentially encompassing a range of non-physician medical care. The contract is geographically focused on Texas (ST: TX), indicating a specific regional need. Workforce implications may involve the employment of skilled health practitioners and support staff within the Texas region.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

The 'exclusion of sources' in the competition method warrants further scrutiny to ensure it was fully justified and did not unduly limit competition.
Lack of detailed service descriptions makes it difficult to fully assess the scope and necessity of the services procured.
The specific nature of the 'miscellaneous health practitioners' services is not detailed, raising questions about the exact medical needs being met.

Positive Signals

The high performance rating (94%) indicates a strong likelihood of successful service delivery and contractor reliability.
The firm-fixed-price contract type provides cost certainty for the government.
The award to a joint venture (GIACARE & MEDTRUST JV LLC) may indicate a strategic approach to combining capabilities for complex requirements.

Sector Analysis

The healthcare services sector, particularly within the federal government, is a significant area of spending. This contract falls under the broader category of healthcare practitioners, which includes a wide array of specialized medical services. Federal spending in this area often supports military readiness, veteran care, and public health initiatives. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically look at per diem rates, service-specific costs, and contract values for similar health support services provided to government entities.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that small business participation (SB: false) was not a primary focus for this specific contract award. There is no indication of a small business set-aside. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem for this particular award is likely minimal. However, the joint venture structure could potentially involve small business subcontractors, though this information is not provided.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the Department of Defense and the Department of the Army. Given the firm-fixed-price nature and the short duration, day-to-day oversight might focus on service delivery quality and adherence to the contract terms. Transparency is generally maintained through contract databases like FPDS. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

TRICARE
Military Health System
Medical Readiness Contracts
Healthcare Services for Federal Agencies

Risk Flags

Limited competition justification
Lack of detailed service scope

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $8.6 million to GIACARE & MEDTRUST JV LLC. RN FY26 1ST TASK ORDER

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is GIACARE & MEDTRUST JV LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $8.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-10-01. End: 2025-12-31.

What is the specific nature of the 'Offices of All Other Miscellaneous Health Practitioners' services being procured?

The NAICS code 621399, 'Offices of All Other Miscellaneous Health Practitioners,' encompasses a broad range of health services not classified elsewhere. This can include practitioners like audiologists, speech-language pathologists, dietitians, physical therapists, occupational therapists, and other allied health professionals. Without more specific details in the contract award notice, it's difficult to pinpoint the exact services. However, given the Department of Defense context, these services could be related to medical readiness, rehabilitation, or specialized care for military personnel and their families. Further investigation into the contract's Performance Work Statement (PWS) would be necessary for a definitive understanding.

How does the $8.56 million cost for 91 days of service compare to market rates for similar health practitioner services?

Directly comparing the $8.56 million for 91 days (approximately 3 months) requires detailed service scope and volume data, which is not fully available. However, this translates to a daily burn rate of roughly $94,077. For specialized health services, especially those requiring certified professionals and potentially operating in high-demand areas or supporting critical functions, this rate might be justifiable. Benchmarking would involve looking at per-diem rates for similar professional services in Texas, considering the specific disciplines involved (e.g., physical therapy, audiology). The firm-fixed-price nature suggests the government has negotiated a set cost, and the 94% performance rating implies the contractor is delivering value commensurate with this price.

What are the potential risks associated with the 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources' procurement method?

The primary risk of 'full and open competition after exclusion of sources' is that it may artificially limit the pool of potential bidders, potentially leading to higher prices than a truly open competition. While justified exclusions can ensure specialized capabilities or address specific market conditions, poorly defined or overly broad exclusions can stifle competition. This method requires a strong justification for excluding certain sources. If the excluded sources possessed relevant capabilities, the government might not have received the most advantageous offers. The lack of transparency regarding *which* sources were excluded and *why* makes a full risk assessment challenging.

What does the 94% performance rating signify for the reliability of GIACARE & MEDTRUST JV LLC?

A 94% performance rating is generally considered excellent and indicates a high level of satisfaction with the contractor's delivery on previous tasks or contracts. This metric suggests that GIACARE & MEDTRUST JV LLC has consistently met or exceeded the requirements and expectations set forth in their agreements. For this specific task order, it implies a reduced risk of performance issues, delays, or quality deficiencies. It provides a strong signal that the contractor is capable and reliable in fulfilling the health services requirement.

What is the historical spending pattern for similar health services by the Department of the Army in Texas?

Analyzing historical spending patterns for similar health services by the Department of the Army in Texas would require accessing detailed federal procurement databases (like FPDS or USASpending.gov) and filtering by agency, location, NAICS code, and contract type over several fiscal years. Without direct access to perform this analysis, it's difficult to provide specific figures. However, military bases and installations often require a range of health support services, suggesting consistent, albeit potentially variable, spending in this category. The current $8.56 million task order should be viewed in the context of this broader historical expenditure to assess if it represents an increase, decrease, or stable level of investment.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Health Care and Social Assistance › Offices of Other Health Practitioners › Offices of All Other Miscellaneous Health Practitioners

Product/Service Code: MEDICAL SERVICES › NURSING, NURSING HOME, EVAL/SCREEN

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 6245 N FEDERAL HWY STE 201, FORT LAUDERDALE, FL, 33308

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Economically Disadvantaged Women Owned Small Business, Hispanic American Owned Business, Joint Venture Economically Disadvantaged Women Owned Small Business, Joint Venture Women Owned Small Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business, Women Owned Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $8,558,069

Exercised Options: $8,558,069

Current Obligation: $8,558,069

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES

Cost or Pricing Data: NO

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: W81K0419D0021

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline