DoD's $36M contract for management consulting services awarded to Amentum National Security Programs, Inc

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $36,034,306 ($36.0M)

Contractor: Amentum National Security Programs, Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2003-12-31

End Date: 2009-05-23

Contract Duration: 1,970 days

Daily Burn Rate: $18.3K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COMBINATION (TWO OR MORE)

Sector: Other

Official Description: 200408!000088!2100!W74V8H!DEF. CONTRACT. CMD. - WASHINGTON!GS10F0009P !C!N! !N!W74V8H04F0107! !20031231!20050104!005126144!005126144!005126144!N!VISTAR CORPORATION !LANDMARK BUILDING !ALEXANDRIA !VA!22304!01000!510!51!ALEXANDRIA !ALEXANDRIA (CITY) !VIRGINIA !+000001000000!N!N!000000000000!B537!MEDICAL & HEALTH STUDIES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !561110!E! !6! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! ! ! !A! ! ! !000! ! ! ! ! ! ! !Y!B!N!N! ! ! ! ! ! !00 ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! !

Place of Performance

Location: WASHINGTON, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA County, DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, 20310

State: District of Columbia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $36.0 million to AMENTUM NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS, INC for work described as: 200408!000088!2100!W74V8H!DEF. CONTRACT. CMD. - WASHINGTON!GS10F0009P !C!N! !N!W74V8H04F0107! !20031231!20050104!005126144!005126144!005126144!N!VISTAR CORPORATION !LANDMARK BUILDING !ALEXANDRIA !VA!22304!01000!510!51!ALEXANDRIA !ALEX… Key points: 1. Contract awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive bidding process. 2. The contract duration of 1970 days indicates a long-term need for these services. 3. The primary service category is Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services. 4. The contract was awarded to a single vendor, Amentum National Security Programs, Inc. 5. The contract was awarded by the Department of the Army, a component of the Department of Defense. 6. The contract's value of over $36 million warrants scrutiny for cost-effectiveness over its lifespan.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

The contract value of $36,034,305.63 for approximately 5.4 years of service appears substantial. Benchmarking this against similar management consulting contracts within the Department of Defense is crucial to assess value for money. Without specific performance metrics or a detailed breakdown of services rendered, it is difficult to definitively assess the cost-effectiveness. However, the duration and total value suggest a significant investment in specialized consulting expertise.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under 'full and open competition,' indicating that all responsible sources were permitted to submit a bid. The data does not specify the number of bidders, but the designation implies a competitive process was initiated. This approach is generally favored to ensure fair pricing and access to the best available services.

Taxpayer Impact: A full and open competition process is intended to drive down costs through market forces, potentially leading to better value for taxpayers compared to sole-source or limited competition awards.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are likely the Department of the Army and potentially other Department of Defense entities requiring administrative and management consulting. Services delivered are expected to include strategic planning, organizational improvement, and general management support. The geographic impact is centered around the District of Columbia, where the contractor is located. Workforce implications may involve the deployment of specialized consultants to support military and civilian leadership within the DoD.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for cost overruns if scope creep occurs over the long contract duration.
Ensuring the quality and relevance of consulting services to evolving DoD needs.
Dependency on a single contractor for critical management functions.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, suggesting a competitive pricing environment.
The contract duration implies a stable and predictable need for the services.
The contractor, Amentum National Security Programs, Inc., likely possesses relevant expertise for DoD operations.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the professional, scientific, and technical services sector, specifically administrative management and general management consulting. This sector is a significant component of federal spending, supporting various government functions. Comparable spending benchmarks would involve analyzing other large-scale consulting contracts awarded by defense agencies for similar services, which often range in the tens to hundreds of millions of dollars depending on scope and duration.

Small Business Impact

The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (ss: false, sb: false). Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications for small businesses stemming from a set-aside provision. The primary contractor, Amentum National Security Programs, Inc., is likely a large business, and any subcontracting would be at their discretion, not mandated by a small business set-aside.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the Department of the Army's contracting and program management offices. Accountability measures would be defined in the contract's statement of work and performance standards. Transparency is facilitated by the contract award data being publicly available, but detailed performance reports and Inspector General oversight would depend on specific agency protocols and any identified issues.

Related Government Programs

Department of Defense Management Consulting Services
Army Professional Services Contracts
Administrative and Management Support Services
Federal Consulting Contracts

Risk Flags

Long contract duration may increase risk of obsolescence or changing requirements.
Significant contract value requires diligent oversight to ensure cost-effectiveness.
Lack of specific performance metrics in award data hinders immediate value assessment.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $36.0 million to AMENTUM NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS, INC. 200408!000088!2100!W74V8H!DEF. CONTRACT. CMD. - WASHINGTON!GS10F0009P !C!N! !N!W74V8H04F0107! !20031231!20050104!005126144!005126144!005126144!N!VISTAR CORPORATION !LANDMARK BUILDING !ALEXANDRIA !VA!22304!01000!510!51!ALEXANDRIA !ALEXANDRIA (CITY) !VIRGINIA !+000001000000!N!N!000000000000!B537!MEDICAL & HEALTH STUDIES !S1 !SERVICES !000 !* !561110!E! !6! ! ! ! ! !999

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is AMENTUM NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS, INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $36.0 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2003-12-31. End: 2009-05-23.

What specific management and administrative consulting services were provided under this contract?

The contract data indicates the primary service category as 'Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services' (NAICS 541611). While the specific tasks are not detailed in the provided data, these services typically encompass areas such as organizational structure analysis, process improvement, strategic planning, policy development, and general operational efficiency enhancements for government agencies. The substantial value and duration suggest a broad scope of support, potentially involving high-level advisory roles and implementation assistance within the Department of the Army.

How does the awarded amount of $36 million compare to similar contracts for management consulting within the DoD?

The awarded amount of $36,034,305.63 over approximately 5.4 years (1970 days) places this contract in the mid-to-large range for management consulting services within the Department of Defense. Large-scale consulting engagements for defense agencies can easily reach tens or hundreds of millions of dollars, depending on the complexity, duration, and specific expertise required. To provide a precise comparison, one would need to benchmark against contracts with similar scope, duration, and service categories awarded by the DoD or its branches over the past few years. Factors like the specific challenges being addressed (e.g., digital transformation, acquisition reform, personnel management) significantly influence cost.

What is the track record of Amentum National Security Programs, Inc. in performing similar government contracts?

Amentum National Security Programs, Inc. (formerly part of AECOM's Management Services division) has a significant history of performing large-scale government contracts, particularly within the defense and national security sectors. Their expertise often spans engineering, program management, logistics, and technical support services. While specific performance metrics for this particular $36 million contract are not detailed in the provided data, Amentum's general profile suggests they are a capable large business accustomed to complex federal requirements. A deeper dive into their contract performance history, including past performance evaluations and any reported issues on similar contracts, would be necessary for a comprehensive assessment.

What are the potential risks associated with a contract of this duration and value?

Contracts of this magnitude and duration (1970 days, ~$36M) carry inherent risks. These include potential scope creep, where the project's requirements expand beyond the original agreement, leading to cost overruns. There's also the risk of the contractor's proposed solutions becoming outdated over the contract's lifespan, especially in rapidly evolving fields. Furthermore, a long-term reliance on a single contractor can reduce flexibility and potentially lead to complacency. Ensuring robust oversight, clear performance metrics, and mechanisms for adapting to changing requirements are critical to mitigate these risks.

How does the 'full and open competition' award mechanism impact the value proposition for the taxpayer?

Awarding a contract through 'full and open competition' is generally considered beneficial for taxpayers. This process allows any responsible source to submit a bid, fostering a competitive environment. Competition typically drives down prices as contractors vie for the award, potentially leading to better value. It also increases the likelihood that the government secures services from the most capable and cost-effective provider. While the data doesn't specify the number of bids received, the designation itself implies an effort to maximize market participation and achieve optimal pricing.

What is the historical spending trend for Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services within the Department of the Army?

Historical spending on Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services (NAICS 541611) by the Department of the Army, and the broader Department of Defense, has been substantial and generally increasing over the past decade. Agencies frequently engage external consultants to address complex challenges in areas like organizational efficiency, strategic planning, IT modernization, and human capital management. This specific contract, valued at over $36 million, aligns with the trend of significant investment in professional services to support military operations and administrative functions. Analyzing trends requires access to historical contract databases to identify patterns in award values, durations, and the number of awarded contracts within this category.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Management, Scientific, and Technical Consulting Services › Administrative Management and General Management Consulting Services

Product/Service Code: SUPPORT SVCS (PROF, ADMIN, MGMT) › PROFESSIONAL SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: COMBINATION (TWO OR MORE) (2)

Contractor Details

Parent Company: AECOM (UEI: 153561212)

Address: 6564 LOISDALE CT STE 900, SPRINGFIELD, VA, 11

Business Categories: Category Business, Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $39,336,001

Exercised Options: $52,419,106

Current Obligation: $36,034,306

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: GS10F0009P

IDV Type: FSS

Timeline