Commerce awarded Amentum $30.1M for facilities management and end-user support over 7 years

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $30,101,377 ($30.1M)

Contractor: Amentum National Security Programs, Inc

Awarding Agency: Department of Commerce

Start Date: 2003-02-01

End Date: 2010-01-31

Contract Duration: 2,556 days

Daily Burn Rate: $11.8K/day

Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Number of Offers Received: 11

Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS

Sector: IT

Official Description: DEPLOYMENT MOVES FOR FACILITIES MANAGEMENT AND END USER SUPPORT CONTRACT.

Place of Performance

Location: ALEXANDRIA, ALEXANDRIA (CITY) County, VIRGINIA, 22313

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Commerce obligated $30.1 million to AMENTUM NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS, INC for work described as: DEPLOYMENT MOVES FOR FACILITIES MANAGEMENT AND END USER SUPPORT CONTRACT. Key points: 1. The contract's duration of 7 years suggests a long-term need for these services. 2. The award was made under full and open competition, indicating a robust bidding process. 3. The contract type, labor hours, implies flexibility in service delivery but requires careful monitoring of effort. 4. The value of $30.1 million over 7 years averages to approximately $4.3 million annually. 5. The services provided are critical for the operational continuity of the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office. 6. The contractor, Amentum National Security Programs, Inc., has a significant presence in government contracting.

Value Assessment

Rating: good

The contract value of $30.1 million over 7 years, averaging $4.3 million annually, appears reasonable for comprehensive facilities management and end-user support for a major federal agency like the USPTO. Benchmarking against similar large-scale IT and facilities management contracts for federal entities suggests this pricing is within expected ranges, especially considering the scope and duration. The labor hours contract type allows for flexibility, but effective management is key to ensuring value for money.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: full-and-open

This contract was awarded under full and open competition, with 11 bidders vying for the opportunity. This high level of competition is a positive indicator, suggesting that the government sought the best possible solution and price. The presence of multiple bidders generally leads to more competitive pricing and a wider range of innovative approaches, benefiting the agency.

Taxpayer Impact: The extensive competition for this contract likely resulted in a more favorable price for taxpayers compared to a sole-source or limited competition award. It ensures that taxpayer funds are used efficiently by driving down costs through market forces.

Public Impact

The U.S. Patent and Trademark Office (USPTO) benefits directly through the reliable operation of its facilities and end-user IT support. This contract ensures the continuity of essential services that support the USPTO's mission of granting patents and registering trademarks. The geographic impact is primarily within the USPTO's operational locations, likely concentrated in Virginia. Workforce implications include the direct employment by Amentum and potential indirect employment within the USPTO's IT and facilities departments.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Potential for cost overruns if labor hours are not managed effectively.
Dependence on a single contractor for critical infrastructure and user support.
Ensuring consistent service quality across all end-users and facilities.

Positive Signals

Awarded through full and open competition, indicating strong market interest and potential for competitive pricing.
Long contract duration suggests a stable and reliable service provider for essential functions.
Contractor has experience in national security programs, implying a capacity for handling sensitive government operations.

Sector Analysis

This contract falls within the IT services and facilities management sector, a significant area of federal spending. The market for these services is large and competitive, with numerous large and small businesses vying for government contracts. The $30.1 million award is substantial, reflecting the critical nature of IT infrastructure and facility operations for a major agency like the USPTO. Comparable spending benchmarks for similar services often range in the millions annually, depending on the agency's size and complexity.

Small Business Impact

This contract was not set aside for small businesses, and there is no explicit indication of subcontracting requirements for small businesses in the provided data. The award to a large prime contractor like Amentum suggests that small businesses may be involved as subcontractors, but their specific role and the extent of their participation are not detailed here. Further analysis would be needed to determine the impact on the small business ecosystem.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically be managed by the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office's contracting officers and program managers. Accountability measures would be embedded in the contract's performance work statement, including service level agreements and reporting requirements. Transparency is generally facilitated through contract award databases and public reporting, though specific performance metrics may not always be publicly disclosed. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply if any fraud, waste, or abuse were suspected.

Related Government Programs

Federal IT Services Contracts
Facilities Management Contracts
End-User Support Services
Department of Commerce Contracts
USPTO Operations Support

Risk Flags

Long contract duration may increase risk of vendor lock-in.
Labor hours contract type requires diligent oversight to prevent cost creep.
Dependence on a single vendor for critical IT and facilities functions.

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Commerce awarded $30.1 million to AMENTUM NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS, INC. DEPLOYMENT MOVES FOR FACILITIES MANAGEMENT AND END USER SUPPORT CONTRACT.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is AMENTUM NATIONAL SECURITY PROGRAMS, INC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Commerce (U.S. Patent and Trademark Office).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $30.1 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2003-02-01. End: 2010-01-31.

What is Amentum National Security Programs, Inc.'s track record with federal contracts, particularly in facilities management and IT support?

Amentum National Security Programs, Inc. (and its predecessor entities) has a substantial history of performing federal contracts across various agencies, including significant work in defense, intelligence, and civilian sectors. Their expertise often spans complex facilities management, IT services, logistics, and mission support. While specific performance details for this particular contract are not publicly detailed, their extensive portfolio suggests a demonstrated capability to manage large-scale government programs. Reviewing past performance evaluations and contract awards for Amentum would provide a more granular understanding of their reliability and effectiveness in similar service areas.

How does the $30.1 million contract value compare to similar facilities management and end-user support contracts awarded by the Department of Commerce or other agencies of similar size?

The $30.1 million value over seven years, averaging approximately $4.3 million annually, positions this contract as a mid-to-large size award for facilities management and end-user support. For agencies like the USPTO, which require robust IT infrastructure and facility maintenance to support its critical patent and trademark functions, this annual figure is generally in line with market rates. Larger agencies or those with more extensive physical footprints might see annual spending in the tens or even hundreds of millions for similar comprehensive services. However, without specific details on the exact scope of services and service level agreements, a precise comparison is challenging. The full and open competition suggests the price was deemed competitive by the market.

What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they being mitigated?

Key risks include potential cost overruns due to the labor hours contract type if not managed diligently, service disruptions impacting USPTO operations, and contractor performance issues. Mitigation strategies likely involve robust oversight by the USPTO contracting officer's representative (COR), strict adherence to the performance work statement (PWS), defined service level agreements (SLAs) with associated penalties or incentives, and regular performance reviews. The contractor's experience and the competitive nature of the award also serve as risk-reduction factors, implying a commitment to meeting performance standards to secure future work.

How effective has Amentum been in delivering facilities management and end-user support services under this specific contract?

Assessing the effectiveness of Amentum under this specific contract requires access to performance reports, customer satisfaction surveys, and potentially data from the USPTO's COR. Publicly available information typically focuses on the award itself rather than ongoing performance metrics. However, the contract's duration (awarded in 2003 and ending in 2010) suggests a level of satisfaction that led to its execution over the full term. Without specific performance data, it's presumed that the USPTO managed the contract to achieve its objectives, but a definitive statement on effectiveness cannot be made solely from the award data.

What has been the historical spending pattern for facilities management and end-user support at the USPTO prior to and during this contract period?

Historical spending patterns for facilities management and end-user support at the USPTO prior to and during this contract period (2003-2010) would reveal trends in IT and infrastructure investment. This specific $30.1 million contract represents a significant portion of such spending over its seven-year term. Analyzing prior contracts would indicate whether spending has increased, decreased, or remained stable, potentially influenced by technological advancements, agency growth, or budget fluctuations. Understanding these patterns helps contextualize the value and necessity of this particular award within the USPTO's overall operational budget and strategic priorities.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Computer Facilities Management Services

Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS › ADP AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE

Offers Received: 11

Pricing Type: LABOR HOURS (Z)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Parent Company: AECOM (UEI: 153561212)

Address: 6564 LOISDALE CT STE 900, SPRINGFIELD, VA, 11

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Small Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $181,978,227

Exercised Options: $181,978,227

Current Obligation: $30,101,377

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: 50PAPT201025

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline