DoD's $17.57M R&D Contract for Missile Systems Awarded to Dayton T. Brown, Inc. with Limited Competition

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $17,572,343 ($17.6M)

Contractor: Dayton T. Brown, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2005-07-29

End Date: 2011-09-28

Contract Duration: 2,252 days

Daily Burn Rate: $7.8K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: R&D

Official Description: 200510!005311!2100!W58RGZ!USA AVIATION AND MISSILE COMMAND!W58RGZ05C0318 !A!N! !Y! ! !20050729!20060131!002050177!002050177!002050177!N!DAYTON T BROWN INC !1175 CHURCH ST !BOHEMIA !NY!11716!07157!103!36!BOHEMIA !SUFFOLK !NEW YORK !+000003698286!N!N!000000000000!AD92!RDTE/OTHER DEFENSE-APPLIED RESEARCH !A2 !MISSILE AND SPACE SYSTEMS !000 !* !541710!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !20200930!B! ! !B! !D!N!U!1!001!N!1G!Z!Y!Z! ! !N!B!N!N! ! !A! !A!A!000!A!B!N! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! !

Place of Performance

Location: BOHEMIA, SUFFOLK County, NEW YORK, 11716

State: New York Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $17.6 million to DAYTON T. BROWN, INC. for work described as: 200510!005311!2100!W58RGZ!USA AVIATION AND MISSILE COMMAND!W58RGZ05C0318 !A!N! !Y! ! !20050729!20060131!002050177!002050177!002050177!N!DAYTON T BROWN INC !1175 CHURCH ST !BOHEMIA !NY!11716!07157!103!36!BOHEMIA !SUFF… Key points: 1. The contract focuses on Research and Development in Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences, specifically for Missile and Space Systems. 2. Awarded to Dayton T. Brown, Inc., a single entity, raising questions about competitive pricing. 3. The contract duration is substantial at 2252 days, indicating a long-term project. 4. The sector is Defense R&D, a critical area for national security and technological advancement.

Value Assessment

Rating: questionable

The contract value of $17.57M for R&D in missile systems is significant. Without competitive bidding, it's difficult to assess if this price represents fair market value compared to similar contracts.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: limited

The contract was not competed, suggesting a sole-source or limited competition award. This limits price discovery and potentially leads to higher costs for taxpayers.

Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition may result in taxpayers paying a premium for the research and development services provided.

Public Impact

Taxpayers may be overpaying due to the absence of competitive bidding. The long contract duration could tie up significant resources for an extended period. The focus on missile systems highlights the importance of this contract for national defense capabilities.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 78 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of competition
Potential for overpayment
Long contract duration

Positive Signals

Supports critical defense R&D
Awarded to a specific firm with expertise

Sector Analysis

This contract falls under the Defense sector, specifically R&D for missile and space systems. Spending in this area is crucial for maintaining technological superiority but requires careful oversight to ensure cost-effectiveness.

Small Business Impact

The data does not indicate any specific provisions or considerations for small business participation in this contract. The award was made to a single, likely larger, entity.

Oversight & Accountability

The 'NOT COMPETED' status raises concerns about the oversight process. A thorough justification for the lack of competition and a review of pricing mechanisms are essential for accountability.

Related Government Programs

Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences
Department of Defense Contracting
Department of the Army Programs

Risk Flags

Lack of competitive bidding
Potential for inflated pricing
Limited transparency in price determination
Long contract duration without clear milestones for re-evaluation

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $17.6 million to DAYTON T. BROWN, INC.. 200510!005311!2100!W58RGZ!USA AVIATION AND MISSILE COMMAND!W58RGZ05C0318 !A!N! !Y! ! !20050729!20060131!002050177!002050177!002050177!N!DAYTON T BROWN INC !1175 CHURCH ST !BOHEMIA !NY!11716!07157!103!36!BOHEMIA !SUFFOLK !NEW YORK !+000003698286!N!N!000000000000!AD92!RDTE/OTHER DEFENSE-APPLIED RESEARCH !A2 !MISSILE AND SPACE SYSTEMS !000 !* !541710!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !202

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is DAYTON T. BROWN, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $17.6 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2005-07-29. End: 2011-09-28.

What was the justification for not competing this significant R&D contract, and how was the price determined to be fair?

The justification for not competing the contract is not provided in the data. Typically, sole-source or limited competition awards require a detailed justification, such as the existence of unique capabilities or urgent needs. Without this information, it's impossible to assess the fairness of the price determination process, which likely relied on negotiation rather than market-driven competition.

What are the potential risks associated with a long-duration, non-competed R&D contract in the defense sector?

Risks include potential cost overruns if requirements change or are poorly defined, lack of innovation spurred by competition, and the possibility of the contractor becoming entrenched, making future transitions difficult or expensive. Furthermore, the government may not benefit from the most cost-effective solutions available in the market due to the absence of competitive pressure.

How does this contract contribute to the overall effectiveness of US missile and space systems development?

While the specific contribution is unclear without project details, R&D contracts are fundamental to advancing technology in critical areas like missile and space systems. Dayton T. Brown, Inc.'s involvement suggests they possess specialized expertise. However, the effectiveness is intrinsically linked to the quality of the research, the relevance of the outcomes to defense needs, and whether the investment yields superior capabilities compared to what competition might have achieved.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Scientific Research and Development Services › Research and Development in the Physical, Engineering, and Life Sciences

Product/Service Code: RESEARCH AND DEVELOPMENT › DEFENSE (OTHER) R&D

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Solicitation ID: W58RGZ05R0576

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1175 CHURCH STREET, BOHEMIA, NY, 11716

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Veteran Owned Business

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL ITEM PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Timeline