DoD Awards $13.4M Contract for Aircraft Parts to Dayton T. Brown, Inc
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $13,451,229 ($13.5M)
Contractor: Dayton T. Brown, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2022-04-25
End Date: 2024-04-24
Contract Duration: 730 days
Daily Burn Rate: $18.4K/day
Competition Type: NOT COMPETED
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: DTB- DOMESTIC
Place of Performance
Location: HOLLYWOOD, SAINT MARYS County, MARYLAND, 20636
State: Maryland Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $13.5 million to DAYTON T. BROWN, INC. for work described as: DTB- DOMESTIC Key points: 1. Contract awarded to Dayton T. Brown, Inc. for $13.4 million. 2. The contract is for 'Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing'. 3. Awarded by the Department of the Navy, part of the Department of Defense. 4. Contract duration is 730 days, ending April 24, 2024. 5. This contract was not competed.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract type is Cost Plus Fixed Fee, which can lead to cost overruns if not managed carefully. The awarded amount of $13.4 million needs to be benchmarked against similar contracts for 'Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing' to assess value.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: sole-source
The contract was not competed, indicating a sole-source or limited competition award. This method of procurement may limit price discovery and potentially result in higher costs for the government compared to a fully competed contract.
Taxpayer Impact: The lack of competition could mean taxpayers are not receiving the best possible price for these aircraft parts.
Public Impact
Ensures continued supply of critical aircraft parts for the Navy. Supports a specific manufacturer, potentially impacting market competition. Potential for increased costs due to non-competitive award.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Lack of competition
- Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract type
- Potential for cost overruns
Positive Signals
- Ensures supply chain continuity
- Supports existing defense infrastructure
Sector Analysis
The 'Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing' sector is crucial for defense readiness. Spending in this sector can fluctuate based on military needs and technological advancements. Benchmarking against industry standards for similar parts is essential for cost-effectiveness.
Small Business Impact
This contract was awarded to Dayton T. Brown, Inc., a large business. There is no indication that small businesses were involved as subcontractors or that this award specifically supports small business participation goals.
Oversight & Accountability
The Department of the Navy is responsible for oversight of this contract. Given the Cost Plus Fixed Fee structure and lack of competition, robust oversight is critical to ensure cost control and prevent waste.
Related Government Programs
- Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Navy Programs
Risk Flags
- Sole-source award limits competition.
- CPFF contract type increases cost overrun risk.
- Lack of transparency in price negotiation.
- Potential for inefficient resource allocation.
- No clear small business participation.
Tags
other-aircraft-parts-and-auxiliary-equip, department-of-defense, md, definitive-contract, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $13.5 million to DAYTON T. BROWN, INC.. DTB- DOMESTIC
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is DAYTON T. BROWN, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $13.5 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2022-04-25. End: 2024-04-24.
What was the justification for awarding this contract on a sole-source basis, and what steps were taken to ensure fair and reasonable pricing?
The justification for a sole-source award typically involves unique capabilities, urgent needs, or lack of viable alternatives. The Department of the Navy should have conducted a price analysis, potentially using historical data or market research, to determine if the proposed cost plus fixed fee was fair and reasonable. Without competition, the government relies heavily on its own analysis to prevent overpayment.
What are the potential risks associated with the Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) contract type for this specific procurement?
The CPFF structure carries inherent risks, primarily the potential for cost overruns. The contractor is reimbursed for allowable costs plus a fixed fee, creating less incentive to control costs compared to fixed-price contracts. If the government's cost estimation or oversight is insufficient, the final cost could significantly exceed initial projections, impacting overall program value.
How does this contract contribute to the overall effectiveness and readiness of the Department of the Navy's aviation assets?
This contract ensures the availability of necessary parts and auxiliary equipment for the Navy's aircraft, directly supporting operational readiness and maintenance schedules. By securing these components, the contract helps maintain the fleet's functionality and responsiveness to mission requirements, thereby contributing to overall defense effectiveness.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Manufacturing › Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing › Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing
Product/Service Code: AEROSPACE CRAFT COMPONENTS AND ACCESSORIES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED
Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE
Solicitation ID: N0042122R0174
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 1175 CHURCH STREET, BOHEMIA, NY, 11716
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $15,000,000
Exercised Options: $15,000,000
Current Obligation: $13,451,229
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: YES
Timeline
Start Date: 2022-04-25
Current End Date: 2024-04-24
Potential End Date: 2024-04-24 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2025-09-15
More Contracts from Dayton T. Brown, Inc.
- PQL Task Order — $31.5M (Department of Defense)
- Task Order for Mobile Quick Look Support — $25.3M (Department of Defense)
- NEW Task Order Under the BOA for the MMS Support Services — $24.7M (Department of Defense)
- 200510!005311!2100!w58rgz!usa Aviation and Missile Command!w58rgz05c0318 !A!N! !Y! ! !20050729!20060131!002050177!002050177!002050177!n!dayton T Brown Inc !1175 Church ST !bohemia !ny!11716!07157!103!36!bohemia !suffolk !NEW York !+000003698286!n!n!000000000000!ad92!rdte/Other Defense-Applied Research !A2 !missile and Space Systems !000 !* !541710!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !20200930!B! ! !B! !d!n!u!1!001!n!1g!z!y!z! ! !n!b!n!n! ! !A! !a!a!000!a!b!n! ! ! ! ! ! !0001! ! — $17.6M (Department of Defense)
- Triton Remote Quick Look — $16.9M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)