Dayton T. Brown, Inc. awarded $25.3M for mobile quick look support, with a significant portion allocated to aircraft parts manufacturing

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $25,323,985 ($25.3M)

Contractor: Dayton T. Brown, Inc.

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2019-03-04

End Date: 2022-03-31

Contract Duration: 1,123 days

Daily Burn Rate: $22.6K/day

Competition Type: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE

Sector: Defense

Official Description: IGF::OT::IGF TASK ORDER FOR MOBILE QUICK LOOK SUPPORT.

Place of Performance

Location: PATUXENT RIVER, SAINT MARYS County, MARYLAND, 20670

State: Maryland Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $25.3 million to DAYTON T. BROWN, INC. for work described as: IGF::OT::IGF TASK ORDER FOR MOBILE QUICK LOOK SUPPORT. Key points: 1. Contract awarded for mobile quick look support, with a substantial portion likely related to aircraft parts and auxiliary equipment. 2. The contract's duration spans over three years, indicating a long-term need for the services provided. 3. Awarded as a delivery order under a larger contract, suggesting a pre-existing relationship or framework agreement. 4. The pricing structure is Cost Plus Fixed Fee, which can lead to cost overruns if not carefully managed. 5. The contract was not competed, raising questions about potential cost savings and market-driven pricing. 6. The primary North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code points to 'Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing'.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

Benchmarking the value of this contract is challenging without more detailed service descriptions. However, the Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) structure inherently carries higher risk for cost control compared to fixed-price contracts. The awarded amount of $25.3 million over approximately three years suggests a moderate annual spend. Without comparable contracts for 'mobile quick look support' or specific aircraft parts manufacturing services, a precise value-for-money assessment is difficult. The lack of competition further complicates direct price comparisons to market rates.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was awarded as 'NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION,' indicating a sole-source or limited competition scenario. This means the Department of the Navy likely identified a specific contractor deemed essential for the requirement, possibly due to proprietary technology, unique capabilities, or an existing sole-source contract vehicle. The absence of a competitive bidding process limits the opportunity for price discovery and potentially higher costs for the government.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers may not benefit from the cost efficiencies that typically arise from a competitive bidding environment. The government may have paid a premium due to the lack of alternative offers.

Public Impact

The Department of the Navy is the primary beneficiary, receiving support services and potentially manufactured parts. Services likely include technical support, analysis, or rapid assessment capabilities for mobile platforms. The contract's focus on aircraft parts suggests a benefit to aviation readiness and maintenance. The geographic impact is not specified but likely centers around naval aviation facilities or operational areas.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of competition could lead to inflated prices.
CPFF contract type increases risk of cost overruns.
Limited transparency into the specific services and deliverables.
Potential for contractor lock-in due to sole-source award.

Positive Signals

Contract addresses a specific need for mobile quick look support.
Long contract duration suggests a sustained requirement and potential for stable support.
Award to a single contractor may indicate specialized expertise.

Sector Analysis

The contract falls within the aerospace and defense manufacturing sector, specifically related to aircraft parts and support services. The NAICS code 'Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing' indicates a focus on components and related services rather than complete aircraft assembly. Spending in this sector is substantial, driven by military modernization, maintenance, and operational readiness requirements. Comparable spending benchmarks would typically involve other defense contracts for aircraft components, repair, and specialized technical support.

Small Business Impact

There is no indication of small business set-asides for this contract, and the prime contractor, Dayton T. Brown, Inc., is not typically classified as a small business. The contract details do not mention subcontracting plans. Therefore, the direct impact on the small business ecosystem appears minimal, with no specific provisions to encourage small business participation.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the Department of the Navy's contracting and program management offices. As a delivery order under a larger contract, existing oversight mechanisms from the parent contract likely apply. Transparency is limited by the sole-source nature and the lack of detailed public reporting on specific deliverables. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.

Related Government Programs

Aircraft Parts Manufacturing
Defense Logistics Support
Naval Aviation Maintenance
Mobile Support Services
Cost Plus Fixed Fee Contracts

Risk Flags

Sole-source award
Cost Plus Fixed Fee contract type
Lack of detailed service description

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $25.3 million to DAYTON T. BROWN, INC.. IGF::OT::IGF TASK ORDER FOR MOBILE QUICK LOOK SUPPORT.

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is DAYTON T. BROWN, INC..

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Navy).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $25.3 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2019-03-04. End: 2022-03-31.

What specific 'mobile quick look support' services are being provided under this contract?

The provided data does not detail the specific 'mobile quick look support' services. However, given the NAICS code and the awarding agency (Department of the Navy), these services likely pertain to rapid technical assessment, diagnostic support, or field service for naval aviation assets or related mobile platforms. This could involve on-site analysis of equipment, troubleshooting, or providing immediate technical expertise in operational environments. The 'quick look' aspect suggests a focus on timely, preliminary evaluations rather than in-depth, long-term analysis.

How does the Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) structure compare to other contract types for similar services?

The Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) structure is common for research and development or services where the scope is not well-defined, allowing flexibility. However, it shifts cost risk to the government, as the contractor is reimbursed for actual costs plus a fixed fee. This contrasts with fixed-price contracts, where the contractor bears the risk of cost overruns. For services where performance metrics are clear and scope is stable, fixed-price contracts often offer better value. The CPFF here suggests the Navy accepted higher cost risk for flexibility or because the exact costs were difficult to predict upfront.

What are the potential risks associated with a sole-source award for aircraft parts and support?

Sole-source awards, like this one, carry several risks. Primarily, the lack of competition can lead to higher prices than might be achieved through a competitive process. There's also a risk of reduced innovation and service quality, as the contractor faces less pressure to improve. Furthermore, it can create contractor dependency, making it difficult for the government to switch providers or negotiate better terms in the future. Without competitive benchmarking, it's harder to ensure the government is receiving optimal value for its investment.

What is the historical spending pattern for Dayton T. Brown, Inc. with the Department of Defense?

Historical spending data for Dayton T. Brown, Inc. with the Department of Defense is not provided in this data snippet. However, a review of public federal procurement databases would reveal the extent and nature of their past contracts. Given their specialization indicated by the NAICS code, it is probable they have a history of supporting naval aviation or other DoD entities with aircraft parts and related technical services. Analyzing past performance and contract values would provide context for this current award.

How does the $25.3 million award compare to the overall budget for naval aviation maintenance and parts?

The $25.3 million award represents a specific task order for mobile quick look support and potentially aircraft parts. To compare it to the overall budget for naval aviation maintenance and parts, one would need access to the total allocated funds for these categories within the Department of the Navy's budget for the contract period (2019-2022). This figure is a fraction of the total defense spending but could be significant within its niche. Without the total budget context, it's difficult to assess its relative scale.

What are the implications of the contract ending in March 2022 for ongoing naval aviation support?

The contract's end date of March 31, 2022, implies that the 'mobile quick look support' and associated services were needed up to that point. If the requirement is ongoing, the Department of the Navy would have needed to either re-compete the requirement, award a new sole-source contract, or extend the existing contract if provisions allowed. The expiration suggests a potential gap or transition period for these specific support functions unless a follow-on contract was already in place.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Manufacturing › Aerospace Product and Parts Manufacturing › Other Aircraft Parts and Auxiliary Equipment Manufacturing

Product/Service Code: AEROSPACE CRAFT COMPONENTS AND ACCESSORIES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT AVAILABLE FOR COMPETITION

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Solicitation ID: N0042118R0065

Pricing Type: COST PLUS FIXED FEE (U)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 1175 CHURCH STREET, BOHEMIA, NY, 11716

Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $25,323,985

Exercised Options: $25,323,985

Current Obligation: $25,323,985

Actual Outlays: $2,031,077

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Parent Contract

Parent Award PIID: N0042119D0029

IDV Type: IDC

Timeline