Army awards $21.4M non-personal services contract for base operations support to Aleut O&M Services, LLC

Contract Overview

Contract Amount: $21,365,461 ($21.4M)

Contractor: Aleut O&M Services, LLC

Awarding Agency: Department of Defense

Start Date: 2025-06-21

End Date: 2026-03-31

Contract Duration: 283 days

Daily Burn Rate: $75.5K/day

Competition Type: NOT COMPETED

Number of Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE

Sector: Other

Official Description: THIS IS A NON-PERSONAL SERVICES CONTRACT TO PROVIDE BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT (BASOPS).

Place of Performance

Location: FORT BELVOIR, FAIRFAX County, VIRGINIA, 22060

State: Virginia Government Spending

Plain-Language Summary

Department of Defense obligated $21.4 million to ALEUT O&M SERVICES, LLC for work described as: THIS IS A NON-PERSONAL SERVICES CONTRACT TO PROVIDE BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT (BASOPS). Key points: 1. The contract is for base operations support, indicating a need for essential facility maintenance and management. 2. Awarded to Aleut O&M Services, LLC, this contract represents a significant investment in maintaining military infrastructure. 3. The contract duration of 283 days suggests a focus on immediate or short-term operational needs. 4. The firm-fixed-price structure aims to provide cost certainty for the government. 5. This contract falls under Facilities Support Services, a broad category encompassing various operational needs. 6. The absence of competition raises questions about potential cost efficiencies and market responsiveness.

Value Assessment

Rating: fair

Benchmarking the value of this contract is challenging without comparable data for similar base operations support contracts in the same region or for the same scope of services. The firm-fixed-price structure provides some cost control, but the lack of competition means there's no direct market comparison to assess if the pricing is optimal. The total award amount of approximately $21.4 million for a period of less than a year suggests a substantial operational requirement.

Cost Per Unit: N/A

Competition Analysis

Competition Level: sole-source

This contract was not competed, indicating a sole-source award. The specific justification for this approach is not provided, but it typically arises from unique capabilities, urgent needs, or situations where only one vendor can meet the requirements. The lack of competition limits the government's ability to explore a wider range of pricing and service offerings from the market.

Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayers may not benefit from the cost savings that can arise from a competitive bidding process, potentially leading to a higher price than if multiple vendors had vied for the contract.

Public Impact

The primary beneficiaries are the Department of the Army and the personnel stationed at the facility requiring base operations support. Services delivered include essential functions for the day-to-day operation and maintenance of a military base. The geographic impact is localized to the specific Army installation where the base operations support is being provided. Workforce implications include the potential for employment opportunities with Aleut O&M Services, LLC, for personnel involved in facilities management and support.

Waste & Efficiency Indicators

Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10

Warning Flags

Lack of competition may lead to higher costs for taxpayers.
Sole-source awards can limit innovation and service improvements.
Contract duration is relatively short, potentially leading to frequent re-competition and associated administrative costs.

Positive Signals

Firm-fixed-price contract provides cost certainty.
Award to an established entity (Aleut O&M Services, LLC) may indicate reliability.
Contract supports essential base operations, ensuring critical functions are maintained.

Sector Analysis

Facilities Support Services (NAICS 561210) is a significant sector within government contracting, encompassing a wide range of services necessary for the operation and maintenance of government facilities. This contract fits within the broader defense sector's need for robust infrastructure support. Comparable spending in this area is substantial across various federal agencies, reflecting the ongoing requirement for maintaining physical assets.

Small Business Impact

There is no indication that this contract included a small business set-aside. Furthermore, the data does not specify any subcontracting requirements for small businesses. This means that opportunities for small businesses to participate in this specific contract may be limited unless they are part of the prime contractor's supply chain or are engaged by the prime contractor independently.

Oversight & Accountability

Oversight for this contract would typically fall under the Department of the Army's contracting and program management offices. Accountability measures are inherent in the firm-fixed-price structure, which obligates the contractor to deliver specified services within the agreed-upon price. Transparency is limited by the sole-source nature of the award, with further details on oversight mechanisms and Inspector General jurisdiction not explicitly provided in the data.

Related Government Programs

Base Operations Support Contracts
Facilities Maintenance Services
Department of Defense Contracts
Army Installation Support

Risk Flags

Sole-source award
Lack of competition
Potential for cost overruns if scope is not well-defined

Frequently Asked Questions

What is this federal contract paying for?

Department of Defense awarded $21.4 million to ALEUT O&M SERVICES, LLC. THIS IS A NON-PERSONAL SERVICES CONTRACT TO PROVIDE BASE OPERATIONS SUPPORT (BASOPS).

Who is the contractor on this award?

The obligated recipient is ALEUT O&M SERVICES, LLC.

Which agency awarded this contract?

Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).

What is the total obligated amount?

The obligated amount is $21.4 million.

What is the period of performance?

Start: 2025-06-21. End: 2026-03-31.

What is the track record of Aleut O&M Services, LLC in performing similar base operations support contracts for the Department of Defense?

Aleut O&M Services, LLC has a history of performing various service contracts, including those related to base operations and facilities support. Their track record with the Department of Defense would need to be assessed through contract performance reports (e.g., CPARS) and historical award data. A review of past performance would reveal their ability to meet deadlines, manage costs, and deliver quality services. Without specific performance data for this contract or direct comparisons, it's difficult to definitively assess their capabilities, but their continued award of contracts suggests a level of satisfactory performance in previous engagements.

How does the awarded price compare to market rates for similar base operations support services?

Directly comparing the awarded price of approximately $21.4 million to market rates for similar base operations support services is challenging without detailed scope of work and geographic location specifics. Base operations support can encompass a wide array of services, from janitorial and grounds maintenance to security and utility management. The firm-fixed-price nature of this contract suggests a defined scope. To benchmark effectively, one would need to identify comparable contracts awarded by other agencies or within the same region for a similar duration and service level. The lack of competition in this award limits the ability to perform a direct market price discovery.

What are the primary risks associated with a sole-source award for base operations support?

The primary risks associated with a sole-source award for base operations support include potential overpricing due to the absence of competitive pressure, reduced incentive for the contractor to innovate or improve service quality, and a lack of market validation for the chosen solution. Taxpayers may bear a higher cost than necessary. Additionally, there's a risk that the contractor may not possess the most efficient or effective methods if alternatives were not explored. The government also loses the opportunity to foster a broader base of capable suppliers through competition.

How effective is the firm-fixed-price contract type in ensuring value for money in base operations support?

The firm-fixed-price (FFP) contract type is generally effective in ensuring value for money when the scope of work is well-defined and risks are understood. For base operations support, where many services are routine and predictable, FFP can provide cost certainty for the government and incentivize the contractor to control costs efficiently. However, if the scope is not precisely defined or unforeseen issues arise, the contractor may seek change orders, potentially increasing the overall cost. The effectiveness also hinges on robust government oversight to ensure the contractor meets all performance requirements within the fixed price.

What is the historical spending trend for base operations support by the Department of the Army?

Historical spending trends for base operations support by the Department of the Army are substantial and consistent, reflecting the ongoing need to maintain numerous installations worldwide. The Army consistently allocates significant portions of its budget to facilities management, infrastructure upkeep, and operational services essential for mission readiness. Spending in this category typically fluctuates based on infrastructure investment cycles, modernization efforts, and operational tempo. Analyzing historical data would reveal patterns in contract types, durations, and the prevalence of competitive versus sole-source awards within this domain.

Industry Classification

NAICS: Administrative and Support and Waste Management and Remediation Services › Facilities Support Services › Facilities Support Services

Product/Service Code: UTILITIES AND HOUSEKEEPING › HOUSEKEEPING SERVICES

Competition & Pricing

Extent Competed: NOT COMPETED

Solicitation Procedures: ONLY ONE SOURCE

Solicitation ID: W5168W25RA025

Offers Received: 1

Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)

Evaluated Preference: NONE

Contractor Details

Address: 5775 MARK DABLING BLVD, COLORADO SPRINGS, CO, 80919

Business Categories: Alaskan Native Corporation Owned Firm, Category Business, Limited Liability Corporation, Minority Owned Business, Native American Owned Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business

Financial Breakdown

Contract Ceiling: $25,900,127

Exercised Options: $25,900,127

Current Obligation: $21,365,461

Contract Characteristics

Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED

Cost or Pricing Data: YES

Timeline