General Dynamics awarded $230M contract for metal parts, with delivery orders extending to 2026
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $230,428,502 ($230.4M)
Contractor: General Dynamics OTS (wilkes Barre), LLC
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2021-03-24
End Date: 2026-01-30
Contract Duration: 1,773 days
Daily Burn Rate: $130.0K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE WITH ECONOMIC PRICE ADJUSTMENT
Sector: Defense
Official Description: M795 METAL PARTS
Place of Performance
Location: WILKES BARRE, LUZERNE County, PENNSYLVANIA, 18702
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $230.4 million to GENERAL DYNAMICS OTS (WILKES BARRE), LLC for work described as: M795 METAL PARTS Key points: 1. Contract value suggests significant demand for specialized metal components. 2. Fixed-price with economic price adjustment indicates potential for cost fluctuations. 3. Full and open competition aims for competitive pricing. 4. Long performance period allows for sustained supply chain integration. 5. Contract awarded to a single entity, General Dynamics OTS, warrants scrutiny of performance. 6. Geographic concentration in Pennsylvania may have local economic implications.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract value of $230M over its performance period is substantial, indicating a significant procurement. Benchmarking against similar contracts for metal parts manufacturing is challenging without more specific details on the exact components. However, the fixed-price with economic price adjustment (FPEPA) structure suggests an attempt to balance cost certainty with market volatility. The contract's value appears reasonable given the potential scale and duration, but a detailed cost breakdown would be needed for a more precise value assessment.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The contract was awarded under full and open competition, suggesting that multiple bidders were likely solicited. This method is generally preferred as it maximizes the pool of potential offerors and encourages competitive pricing. The specific number of bidders is not provided, but the 'full and open' designation implies a robust competitive process was intended.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is beneficial for taxpayers as it drives down prices through market forces, ensuring the government receives the best possible value for its investment in these metal parts.
Public Impact
The Department of Defense, specifically the Department of the Army, is the primary beneficiary, receiving critical metal parts for its operations. The contract supports the manufacturing and supply of essential components, likely for military equipment or systems. The primary geographic impact is in Pennsylvania, where General Dynamics OTS (Wilkes Barre) is located, potentially supporting local jobs and the regional economy. The contract implies a sustained need for these parts, contributing to the stability of the defense industrial base and associated workforce.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for cost overruns due to the economic price adjustment clause if raw material costs increase significantly.
- Dependence on a single contractor, General Dynamics OTS, for a large volume of critical parts could pose supply chain risks.
- Lack of specific details on the exact 'metal parts' makes it difficult to assess the criticality and potential for substitution.
Positive Signals
- Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a competitive bidding process.
- The fixed-price nature, even with an adjustment clause, provides a degree of cost control.
- Long contract duration allows for stable planning and potential for economies of scale in production.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the broader defense manufacturing sector, specifically focusing on the production of metal components. The North American Industry Classification System (NAICS) code 332993, 'Ammunition (except Small Arms) Manufacturing,' suggests these parts are critical for ordnance or related systems. The defense industrial base relies heavily on specialized manufacturers like General Dynamics for a consistent supply of high-quality components. Spending in this sub-sector is driven by military readiness requirements and modernization programs.
Small Business Impact
The data indicates that this contract was not set aside for small businesses (sb: false) and does not appear to have a small business subcontracting plan requirement (st: PA, which likely refers to the state). Therefore, the direct impact on small businesses through this specific award is likely minimal, unless General Dynamics OTS engages them as suppliers independently. The focus is on a large prime contractor, suggesting larger-scale manufacturing capabilities are being utilized.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract would primarily fall under the Department of Defense's contracting and procurement regulations. The Army Contracting Command would be responsible for monitoring performance, adherence to terms, and financial oversight. The fixed-price with economic price adjustment (FPEPA) clause requires careful monitoring of price adjustments to ensure they are justified and do not lead to excessive costs. Transparency is generally maintained through contract databases, but detailed performance metrics are often internal.
Related Government Programs
- Department of Defense Ammunition Procurement
- Defense Industrial Base Manufacturing Contracts
- Army Ordnance Supply Chain
- General Dynamics Defense Contracts
Risk Flags
- Economic Price Adjustment Clause Risk
- Single Source Dependency Risk (if competition was limited in practice)
- Supply Chain Disruption Risk
- Quality Control and Specification Adherence Risk
Tags
defense, department-of-defense, department-of-the-army, ammunition-manufacturing, metal-parts, full-and-open-competition, fixed-price-with-economic-price-adjustment, delivery-order, general-dynamics, pennsylvania, long-term-contract
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $230.4 million to GENERAL DYNAMICS OTS (WILKES BARRE), LLC. M795 METAL PARTS
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is GENERAL DYNAMICS OTS (WILKES BARRE), LLC.
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $230.4 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2021-03-24. End: 2026-01-30.
What specific types of metal parts are being procured under this contract, and what is their intended use?
The provided data indicates the NAICS code is 332993, 'Ammunition (except Small Arms) Manufacturing.' This strongly suggests that the 'M795 METAL PARTS' are components for ammunition, likely related to artillery shells or other ordnance, excluding small arms ammunition. These parts are critical for the assembly of functional munitions required by the Department of the Army for training, readiness, and operational deployment. Without access to the detailed contract line items or specifications, the precise nature of each 'metal part' remains unspecified, but their classification points towards explosive ordnance components.
How does the $230M contract value compare to historical spending on similar metal parts or ammunition components by the Department of Defense?
Comparing the $230M contract value requires context on the specific 'M795 METAL PARTS' and their historical procurement volumes. If these are standard components for widely used munitions, this value might represent a significant portion of annual demand. However, if they are for specialized or newly developed ordnance, the value could reflect initial production runs or lower-volume, high-cost items. Historical data from sources like the Federal Procurement Data System (FPDS) or agency budget justifications would be needed to establish a benchmark. Given the long performance period (2021-2026), the annual spending rate is approximately $40-50 million, which is substantial but needs to be evaluated against the total defense budget and specific ordnance needs.
What are the key performance indicators (KPIs) and quality assurance measures in place for this contract to ensure the metal parts meet stringent military specifications?
While specific KPIs are not detailed in the provided summary, defense contracts of this nature typically include rigorous quality assurance (QA) provisions. These often involve detailed technical specifications, material certifications, dimensional inspections, and performance testing of the manufactured parts. The Department of the Army's quality assurance representatives (QARs) would likely be involved in inspecting the contractor's facilities and products. Failure to meet stringent military specifications could result in rejection of goods, contract penalties, or termination. The 'FIXED PRICE WITH ECONOMIC PRICE ADJUSTMENT' (FPEPA) contract type implies that the government is paying a set price for conforming goods, underscoring the importance of quality control.
What is the track record of General Dynamics OTS (Wilkes Barre), LLC, in fulfilling similar defense manufacturing contracts, particularly for ammunition components?
General Dynamics is a major defense contractor with a long history of producing a wide range of military equipment and components. General Dynamics Ordnance and Tactical Systems (OTS), specifically, is known for its expertise in munitions, including artillery shells, mortar systems, and related components. Their track record typically involves large-scale production, adherence to strict quality standards, and delivery to various branches of the U.S. military and allied nations. While specific performance details for this exact contract are not provided, the company's established position in the defense sector suggests a generally reliable capability for fulfilling such requirements. However, individual contract performance can vary, and a deeper dive into past contract awards and performance reviews would offer a more granular assessment.
What are the potential risks associated with the 'economic price adjustment' (EPA) clause in this contract, and how are they mitigated?
The economic price adjustment (EPA) clause in this contract allows for adjustments to the contract price based on fluctuations in specified economic factors, typically raw material costs, labor rates, or other input prices. The primary risk for the government is potential cost increases if these factors rise significantly over the contract period, leading to higher-than-anticipated expenditures. Mitigation strategies often include defining specific indices or formulas for adjustment, setting caps on the total adjustment allowed, requiring detailed documentation from the contractor to justify price changes, and conducting thorough government review of adjustment requests. The 'FIXED PRICE' nature of the base contract aims to provide some cost certainty, but the EPA introduces a degree of cost uncertainty that requires diligent oversight.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Manufacturing › Other Fabricated Metal Product Manufacturing › Ammunition (except Small Arms) Manufacturing
Product/Service Code: AMMUNITION AND EXPLOSIVES
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: NEGOTIATED PROPOSAL/QUOTE
Pricing Type: FIXED PRICE WITH ECONOMIC PRICE ADJUSTMENT (K)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Parent Company: Wico Limited
Address: 1500 HIGHWAY 315 BLVD, WILKES BARRE, PA, 18702
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Manufacturer of Goods, Not Designated a Small Business, Special Designations, Subchapter S Corporation, U.S.-Owned Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $230,428,502
Exercised Options: $230,428,502
Current Obligation: $230,428,502
Subaward Activity
Number of Subawards: 19
Total Subaward Amount: $63,511,854
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: YES
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: W15QKN19D0084
IDV Type: IDC
Timeline
Start Date: 2021-03-24
Current End Date: 2026-01-30
Potential End Date: 2026-01-30 12:01:00
Last Modified: 2025-04-29
More Contracts from General Dynamics OTS (wilkes Barre), LLC
- Manufacture, Assembly, Inspection, Package, and Delivery of the 155MM Artillery M795 Projectile Body Assembly in Support of Ukraine — $700.1M (Department of Defense)
- 155MM Capacity Expansion Project for M795 and M1128 to 65k/Month — $356.4M (Department of Defense)
- Production Base Support Project for Universal Artillery Projectile Line AT Scaap — $180.2M (Department of Defense)
- Purchase of M795 and 120MM Large Caliber Metal Parts — $177.7M (Department of Defense)
- Requirements for Manufacture,Inspection,and Delivery of 60mm&81mm Mortar Projectile (shell Bodies). This Includes Seven Shell Body Types Which ARE Comprised of the Following: M769, Painted Body, M720A1, Body Assembly for Projectile 60MM , HE , M720 High Explosive, M879A1, 81MM Practice Round, M821, 81MM, High Explosive, M879A1, 81MM Practice Round, M722, Smoke Round. ALL Shell Bodies Produced Under This Effort Will Support the Load/ Assemble/Pack (LAP) of 60mm&81mm Forged High Explosive, M879, 81MM Practice Rounds , and White Phosphorus (WP) Smoke Rounds — $159.3M (Department of Defense)
View all General Dynamics OTS (wilkes Barre), LLC federal contracts →
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)