DoD's $34.1M IT Support Contract for Army Criminal Investigations Faces Scrutiny Over Competition and Value
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $34,104,568 ($34.1M)
Contractor: Interimage, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2017-08-01
End Date: 2022-06-30
Contract Duration: 1,794 days
Daily Burn Rate: $19.0K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Number of Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: IT
Official Description: IGF::OT::IGF ORDER PROVIDES OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE (O&M) OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (IT) SUPPORT AND ENHANCEMENT SERVICES TO SECURE THE EXISTING CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS (CIMS) ENVIRONMENT, AS WELL AS DESIGN, DEVELOP, TEST AND IMPLEMENT NEW FUNCTIONALITY TO SUPPORT THE US ARMY CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION COMMAND (USACIC) ARMY LAW ENFORCEMENT (LE) MISSION. CONTRACT TYPES INCLUDE FIRM FIXED PRICE (FFP) / O&M LABOR, COST PLUS FIXED FEE (CPFF) / RESEARCH&DEVELOPMENT (R&D) LABOR, AND COST NO FEE / OTHER DIRECT COSTS (ODC) AND TRAVEL. PERIOD OF PERFORMANCE IS AN 11-MONTH BASE PERIOD, PLUS FOUR (4) 12-MONTH OPTION PERIODS, AND 1-MONTH PHASE-OUT TRANSITION PERIOD, IF REQUIRED.
Place of Performance
Location: ARLINGTON, ARLINGTON County, VIRGINIA, 22203
State: Virginia Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $34.1 million to INTERIMAGE, INC. for work described as: IGF::OT::IGF ORDER PROVIDES OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE (O&M) OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (IT) SUPPORT AND ENHANCEMENT SERVICES TO SECURE THE EXISTING CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS (CIMS) ENVIRONMENT, AS WELL AS DESIGN, DEVELOP, TEST AND IMPLEMENT NEW FUNCTIONALITY TO S… Key points: 1. The contract provides essential IT operations and maintenance for the Army's criminal investigation systems. 2. Competition was 'Full and Open After Exclusion of Sources,' raising questions about the breadth of initial competition. 3. A mix of contract types (FFP, CPFF, Cost No Fee) suggests complexity in managing performance and costs. 4. The sector is IT services, specifically supporting law enforcement and criminal investigation functions within the military.
Value Assessment
Rating: fair
The contract's total value of $34.1M over nearly 5 years requires careful benchmarking against similar IT O&M and development contracts. The mix of contract types complicates a direct per-unit cost comparison.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
The 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' indicates that while the competition was open, certain sources were initially excluded, potentially limiting the initial pool of bidders and impacting price discovery.
Taxpayer Impact: Taxpayer funds are being used for critical IT infrastructure supporting law enforcement. Ensuring competitive pricing and efficient service delivery is key to maximizing value for money.
Public Impact
Ensures continuity of critical IT systems for Army criminal investigations. Supports the law enforcement mission of the US Army Criminal Investigation Command. Potential for enhanced functionality through new development and testing. Contract duration of nearly 5 years provides stability for service delivery.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Ambiguity in 'Exclusion of Sources' could limit competition.
- Complex contract types may lead to cost overruns if not managed tightly.
- Lack of clear performance metrics for O&M and development.
Positive Signals
- Supports a critical national security function.
- Long-term contract provides service stability.
- Includes provisions for new functionality development.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the IT services sector, specifically focusing on computer systems design and related services. Spending benchmarks for similar IT O&M and development contracts for federal law enforcement agencies would be relevant for comparison.
Small Business Impact
The data does not indicate whether small businesses were involved in this contract, either as prime contractors or subcontractors. Further analysis would be needed to determine small business participation.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight would typically involve contract performance reviews, financial audits, and adherence to security protocols by the Department of Defense and the Army. The complexity of contract types necessitates robust oversight.
Related Government Programs
- Computer Systems Design Services
- Department of Defense Contracting
- Department of the Army Programs
Risk Flags
- Potential for limited competition due to source exclusion.
- Risk of cost overruns with CPFF and Cost No Fee contract types.
- Complexity in managing diverse contract structures.
- Need for clear performance metrics across all service areas.
Tags
computer-systems-design-services, department-of-defense, va, delivery-order, 10m-plus
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $34.1 million to INTERIMAGE, INC.. IGF::OT::IGF ORDER PROVIDES OPERATIONS AND MAINTENANCE (O&M) OF INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY (IT) SUPPORT AND ENHANCEMENT SERVICES TO SECURE THE EXISTING CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION MANAGEMENT SYSTEMS (CIMS) ENVIRONMENT, AS WELL AS DESIGN, DEVELOP, TEST AND IMPLEMENT NEW FUNCTIONALITY TO SUPPORT THE US ARMY CRIMINAL INVESTIGATION COMMAND (USACIC) ARMY LAW ENFORCEMENT (LE) MISSION. CONTRACT TYPES INCLUDE FIRM FIXED PRICE (FFP) / O&M LABOR, COST PLUS FIXED FEE (CPFF) / RESEARCH&DEVELOPMENT (R&D) LABOR, AND
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is INTERIMAGE, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Department of the Army).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $34.1 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2017-08-01. End: 2022-06-30.
What was the rationale behind excluding specific sources in the 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources'?
The rationale for excluding specific sources in a 'Full and Open Competition After Exclusion of Sources' typically relates to national security concerns, proprietary technology, or specific capabilities required that only certain vendors possess. Without further details, it's difficult to ascertain the exact reasons, but it implies a deliberate narrowing of the initial bidder pool.
How effectively are the different contract types (FFP, CPFF, Cost No Fee) being managed to control costs and ensure performance?
The mix of contract types suggests a strategy to balance risk and reward. Firm Fixed Price (FFP) for O&M labor aims for cost certainty, while Cost Plus Fixed Fee (CPFF) for R&D allows flexibility but requires careful oversight to prevent cost overruns. Cost No Fee for ODCs and travel needs strict monitoring. Effective management hinges on clear performance metrics and diligent financial tracking for each component.
What is the projected return on investment for the development and implementation of new functionality within the CIMS environment?
The return on investment for new functionality is not explicitly detailed in the provided data. It would depend on factors such as improved efficiency in criminal investigations, enhanced data analysis capabilities, reduced manual processes, and better security. Quantifying this ROI would require specific metrics related to the new features' impact on mission effectiveness and cost savings.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Computer Systems Design Services
Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS › ADP AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION AFTER EXCLUSION OF SOURCES
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Solicitation ID: W15QKN17R0002
Offers Received: 2
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 4301 FAIRFAX DR STE 205, ARLINGTON, VA, 22203
Business Categories: 8(a) Program Participant, Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Economically Disadvantaged Women Owned Small Business, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business, Women Owned Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $46,296,049
Exercised Options: $34,104,568
Current Obligation: $34,104,568
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES PROCEDURES NOT USED
Cost or Pricing Data: NO
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: GS06F0632Z
IDV Type: GWAC
Timeline
Start Date: 2017-08-01
Current End Date: 2022-06-30
Potential End Date: 2022-07-31 12:07:00
Last Modified: 2022-06-17
More Contracts from Interimage, Inc.
- Jopes/Jcrm Sustainment and Maintenance — $10.2M (Department of Defense)
- Software Development — $9.9M (Department of Justice)
- Provide Maintenance, Sustainment, LAB Support, and Project Management That Supports System Availability, Stability, and Interoperability of Joint Operational Planning and Execution System and Joint Capabilities Requirements Manager — $7.4M (Department of Defense)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)