DoD's $7.4M contract for Joint Operational Planning System support awarded to InterImage, Inc
Contract Overview
Contract Amount: $7,408,004 ($7.4M)
Contractor: Interimage, Inc.
Awarding Agency: Department of Defense
Start Date: 2025-09-05
End Date: 2026-07-17
Contract Duration: 315 days
Daily Burn Rate: $23.5K/day
Competition Type: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Number of Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE
Sector: Defense
Official Description: PROVIDE MAINTENANCE, SUSTAINMENT, LAB SUPPORT, AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT THAT SUPPORTS SYSTEM AVAILABILITY, STABILITY, AND INTEROPERABILITY OF JOINT OPERATIONAL PLANNING AND EXECUTION SYSTEM AND JOINT CAPABILITIES REQUIREMENTS MANAGER.
Place of Performance
Location: FORT GEORGE G MEADE, ANNE ARUNDEL County, MARYLAND, 20755
State: Maryland Government Spending
Plain-Language Summary
Department of Defense obligated $7.4 million to INTERIMAGE, INC. for work described as: PROVIDE MAINTENANCE, SUSTAINMENT, LAB SUPPORT, AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT THAT SUPPORTS SYSTEM AVAILABILITY, STABILITY, AND INTEROPERABILITY OF JOINT OPERATIONAL PLANNING AND EXECUTION SYSTEM AND JOINT CAPABILITIES REQUIREMENTS MANAGER. Key points: 1. Contract focuses on critical system availability, stability, and interoperability. 2. Awarded via full and open competition, suggesting a robust market. 3. Firm Fixed Price contract type aims to control costs. 4. Duration of 315 days indicates a focused, short-term support need. 5. The contract is for maintenance, sustainment, lab support, and project management. 6. Geographic location is Maryland, a hub for defense IT services.
Value Assessment
Rating: good
The contract's value of $7.4 million for a period of 315 days appears reasonable for specialized IT support services. Benchmarking against similar contracts for system sustainment and project management within the Department of Defense would provide a more precise value-for-money assessment. The firm fixed-price structure is a positive indicator for cost control, assuming the scope of work is well-defined.
Cost Per Unit: N/A
Competition Analysis
Competition Level: full-and-open
This contract was awarded under full and open competition, indicating that multiple vendors had the opportunity to bid. The number of bidders is not specified, but this procurement method generally fosters competitive pricing and allows the government to select the best value offering. The open competition suggests a healthy market for these specialized IT support services.
Taxpayer Impact: Full and open competition is beneficial for taxpayers as it typically drives down prices through market forces and ensures the government receives competitive offers, maximizing the value of taxpayer dollars.
Public Impact
Military personnel relying on the Joint Operational Planning and Execution System (JOPES) and Joint Capabilities Requirements Manager (JCRM) for mission planning and execution will benefit from improved system availability and stability. The services delivered will ensure the continued operational readiness of critical defense planning tools. The geographic impact is primarily within Maryland, where the contractor is located and likely where the support personnel are based. Workforce implications include the potential for skilled IT professionals to be engaged in supporting vital national defense systems.
Waste & Efficiency Indicators
Waste Risk Score: 50 / 10
Warning Flags
- Potential for scope creep if project management is not rigorously enforced.
- Dependence on a single contractor for critical system sustainment could pose a risk if performance issues arise.
- Ensuring continued interoperability with evolving defense systems requires proactive management.
Positive Signals
- Firm fixed-price contract helps manage cost overruns.
- Awarded through full and open competition, indicating a competitive market.
- Focus on system availability and stability directly supports operational readiness.
Sector Analysis
This contract falls within the IT services sector, specifically focusing on custom computer programming and IT support for defense systems. The market for defense IT support is substantial, with significant government spending allocated to maintaining and enhancing complex operational systems. This contract represents a small but crucial component of the broader defense IT infrastructure, ensuring the smooth functioning of planning and execution tools.
Small Business Impact
The contract data indicates that small business participation (ss: false, sb: false) was not a specific set-aside requirement for this particular award. Therefore, there are no direct subcontracting implications mandated by a small business set-aside. The prime contractor, InterImage, Inc., will manage the contract, and any subcontracting would be at their discretion, not driven by specific small business goals for this delivery order.
Oversight & Accountability
Oversight for this contract will be managed by the Department of Defense, likely through the Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA) contracting and program management offices. Accountability measures will be embedded in the contract's performance standards and delivery schedules. Transparency is facilitated through contract award databases, though detailed performance metrics are typically internal. Inspector General jurisdiction would apply in cases of fraud, waste, or abuse.
Related Government Programs
- Joint Operational Planning and Execution System (JOPES)
- Joint Capabilities Requirements Manager (JCRM)
- Defense Information Systems Agency (DISA) IT Support Contracts
- Department of Defense Command and Control Systems
Risk Flags
- Performance Risk: Ensuring contractor meets uptime and stability requirements.
- Scope Creep Risk: Managing project scope effectively over the contract duration.
- Interoperability Risk: Maintaining compatibility with evolving defense IT infrastructure.
Tags
defense, department-of-defense, disa, it-services, custom-computer-programming, firm-fixed-price, full-and-open-competition, system-maintenance, sustainment, project-management, maryland, delivery-order
Frequently Asked Questions
What is this federal contract paying for?
Department of Defense awarded $7.4 million to INTERIMAGE, INC.. PROVIDE MAINTENANCE, SUSTAINMENT, LAB SUPPORT, AND PROJECT MANAGEMENT THAT SUPPORTS SYSTEM AVAILABILITY, STABILITY, AND INTEROPERABILITY OF JOINT OPERATIONAL PLANNING AND EXECUTION SYSTEM AND JOINT CAPABILITIES REQUIREMENTS MANAGER.
Who is the contractor on this award?
The obligated recipient is INTERIMAGE, INC..
Which agency awarded this contract?
Awarding agency: Department of Defense (Defense Information Systems Agency).
What is the total obligated amount?
The obligated amount is $7.4 million.
What is the period of performance?
Start: 2025-09-05. End: 2026-07-17.
What is InterImage, Inc.'s track record with the Department of Defense and DISA for similar IT support services?
InterImage, Inc. has a history of performing IT services for the Department of Defense. While specific details on past performance for JOPES or JCRM sustainment are not provided in this data snippet, their presence as a contractor suggests prior experience. A deeper dive into their contract history with DISA and other DoD components would reveal the scope, duration, and success of their previous engagements. Analyzing past performance reviews, on-time delivery rates, and any past disputes or contract modifications would offer a clearer picture of their reliability and capability in fulfilling complex IT support requirements for critical defense systems.
How does the $7.4 million value compare to similar sustainment contracts for defense planning systems?
The $7.4 million value for 315 days of support for system availability, stability, and interoperability of JOPES and JCRM appears to be within a reasonable range for specialized defense IT services. However, a precise benchmark requires comparison with contracts of similar scope, duration, and complexity, specifically for sustainment and project management of large-scale operational planning systems within the DoD. Factors such as the level of technical expertise required, the criticality of the systems, and the specific services included (maintenance, lab support, project management) heavily influence pricing. Without direct comparable contract data, it's difficult to definitively state if this represents excellent or merely fair value, though the firm fixed-price nature and full and open competition are positive indicators.
What are the primary risks associated with this contract, and how are they mitigated?
Primary risks include potential performance deficiencies by the contractor, leading to system downtime or reduced functionality, and the risk of scope creep if project management is not robust. Interoperability challenges with evolving defense architectures also pose a risk. Mitigation strategies include the firm fixed-price contract type, which incentivizes the contractor to manage costs and deliver within scope. The requirement for system availability, stability, and interoperability implies performance standards that, if not met, could lead to contractual remedies. DISA's oversight and the competitive nature of the award also serve as indirect mitigation factors, as the contractor is motivated to perform well to secure future work.
How effective is the firm fixed-price (FFP) contract type in ensuring value for money for these IT sustainment services?
The Firm Fixed-Price (FFP) contract type is generally considered effective in ensuring value for money for IT sustainment services when the scope of work is well-defined and understood. It shifts the risk of cost overruns to the contractor, incentivizing them to perform efficiently and control expenses. For services like maintenance, sustainment, and lab support, where requirements can be relatively predictable, FFP provides cost certainty for the government. However, if the scope is ambiguous or subject to significant change, FFP can lead to contractor resistance to necessary modifications or potentially inflated initial pricing to cover unforeseen risks. In this case, the 315-day duration suggests a defined period, making FFP a suitable choice for cost control.
What are the historical spending patterns for JOPES and JCRM sustainment within the DoD?
Historical spending patterns for JOPES and JCRM sustainment within the DoD are not detailed in the provided data. However, it is understood that critical operational planning and execution systems require continuous investment for maintenance, updates, and sustainment to ensure readiness and interoperability. Such systems typically have multi-year support contracts, with annual spending fluctuating based on modernization efforts, security updates, and operational tempo. Analyzing historical budgets allocated to DISA or specific program offices responsible for these systems would reveal trends in spending, identify periods of significant investment or cost-saving initiatives, and provide context for the current contract's value.
Industry Classification
NAICS: Professional, Scientific, and Technical Services › Computer Systems Design and Related Services › Custom Computer Programming Services
Product/Service Code: IT AND TELECOM - INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY AND TELECOMMUNICATIONS › IT AND TELECOM - APLLICATIONS
Competition & Pricing
Extent Competed: FULL AND OPEN COMPETITION
Solicitation Procedures: SUBJECT TO MULTIPLE AWARD FAIR OPPORTUNITY
Offers Received: 1
Pricing Type: FIRM FIXED PRICE (J)
Evaluated Preference: NONE
Contractor Details
Address: 4121 WILSON BLVD FI 5, ARLINGTON, VA, 22203
Business Categories: Category Business, Corporate Entity Not Tax Exempt, Self-Certified Small Disadvantaged Business, Small Business, Special Designations, U.S.-Owned Business, Woman Owned Business, Women Owned Small Business
Financial Breakdown
Contract Ceiling: $10,821,092
Exercised Options: $7,468,611
Current Obligation: $7,408,004
Contract Characteristics
Commercial Item: COMMERCIAL PRODUCTS/SERVICES
Parent Contract
Parent Award PIID: 47QTCA18D001Q
IDV Type: FSS
Timeline
Start Date: 2025-09-05
Current End Date: 2026-07-17
Potential End Date: 2026-09-30 00:00:00
Last Modified: 2025-12-31
More Contracts from Interimage, Inc.
- Order Provides Operations and Maintenance (O&M) of Information Technology (IT) Support and Enhancement Services to Secure the Existing Criminal Investigation Management Systems (cims) Environment, AS Well AS Design, Develop, Test and Implement NEW Functionality to Support the US Army Criminal Investigation Command (usacic) Army LAW Enforcement (LE) Mission. Contract Types Include Firm Fixed Price (FFP) / O&M Labor, Cost Plus Fixed FEE (cpff) / Research&development (R&D) Labor, and Cost NO FEE / Other Direct Costs (ODC) and Travel. Period of Performance IS an 11-Month Base Period, Plus Four (4) 12-Month Option Periods, and 1-Month Phase-Out Transition Period, IF Required — $34.1M (Department of Defense)
- Jopes/Jcrm Sustainment and Maintenance — $10.2M (Department of Defense)
- Software Development — $9.9M (Department of Justice)
Other Department of Defense Contracts
- Federal Contract — $51.3B (Humana Government Business Inc)
- Lrip LOT 12 Advance Acquisition Contract — $35.1B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- SSN 802 and 803 Long Lead Time Material — $34.7B (Electric Boat Corporation)
- 200204!008532!1700!AF600 !naval AIR Systems Command !N0001902C3002 !A!N! !N! !20011026!20120430!008016958!008016958!834951691!n!lockheed Martin Corporation !lockheed Blvd !fort Worth !tx!76108!27000!439!48!fort Worth !tarrant !texas !+000026000000!n!n!018981928201!ac15!rdte/Aircraft-Eng/Manuf Develop !a1a!airframes and Spares !2ama!jast/Jsf !336411!E! !3! ! ! ! ! !99990909!B! ! !A! !a!n!r!2!002!n!1a!a!n!z! ! !N!C!N! ! ! !a!a!a!a!000!a!c!n! ! ! !Y! !N00019!0001! — $34.2B (Lockheed Martin Corporation)
- KC-X Modernization Program — $32.0B (THE Boeing Company)